Skip to main content
Top

07-04-2022 | Doxycycline | Original Article

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is crucial when treating Finegoldia magna infections

Authors: Fabienne Walser, Julia Prinz, Stefan Rahm, Patrick O. Zingg, Stefano Mancini, Frank Imkamp, Reinhard Zbinden, Yvonne Achermann

Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Login to get access

Abstract

Finegoldia magna is an anaerobic gram-positive bacterium that can cause invasive human infections. Recently, a 52-year-old patient suffering from a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) due to F. magna was treated with cefepime on hemodialysis; however, treatment failed due to relapse caused by antibiotic-resistant strains. Reports on the antimicrobial susceptibility of F. magna clinical isolates are rare. We collected 57 clinical F. magna isolates from Zurich, Switzerland, between September 2019 and July 2020 and tested their antimicrobial susceptibility to investigate the local resistance pattern. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was evaluated for nine antibiotics (benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cefepime, levofloxacin, rifampicin, metronidazole, doxycycline, and clindamycin) by E-test according to CLSI guidelines. All F. magna strains were susceptible to benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and metronidazole, while 75% to clindamycin. F. magna isolates showed MIC values lower than species-unrelated breakpoints for cefuroxime, levofloxacin, and cefepime in 93%, 56%, and 32% of the cases, respectively. MIC values for rifampicin and doxycycline were lower than locally determined ECOFFs in 98% and 72% of the cases, respectively. In summary, we recommend the use of benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, or metronidazole without prior AST as first-line treatment option against F. magna PJI infections. If cefuroxime, cefepime, levofloxacin, rifampicin, doxycycline, or clindamycin are used, AST is mandatory.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Murdoch DA, Shah HN (1999) Reclassification of Peptostreptococcus magnus (Prevot 1933) Holdeman and Moore 1972 as Finegoldia magna comb. nov. and Peptostreptococcus micros (Prevot 1933) Smith 1957 as Micromonas micros comb. nov. Anaerobe 5(5):555–559CrossRef Murdoch DA, Shah HN (1999) Reclassification of Peptostreptococcus magnus (Prevot 1933) Holdeman and Moore 1972 as Finegoldia magna comb. nov. and Peptostreptococcus micros (Prevot 1933) Smith 1957 as Micromonas micros comb. nov. Anaerobe 5(5):555–559CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Murphy EC, Frick IM (2013) Gram-positive anaerobic cocci–commensals and opportunistic pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(4):520–553CrossRef Murphy EC, Frick IM (2013) Gram-positive anaerobic cocci–commensals and opportunistic pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(4):520–553CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Söderquist B et al (2017) Finegoldia magna isolated from orthopedic joint implant-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol 55(11):3283–3291CrossRef Söderquist B et al (2017) Finegoldia magna isolated from orthopedic joint implant-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol 55(11):3283–3291CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Walter G et al (2014) Bone and joint infections due to anaerobic bacteria: an analysis of 61 cases and review of the literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33(8):1355–1364CrossRef Walter G et al (2014) Bone and joint infections due to anaerobic bacteria: an analysis of 61 cases and review of the literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33(8):1355–1364CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schulthess B et al (2013) Identification of Gram-positive cocci by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: comparison of different preparation methods and implementation of a practical algorithm for routine diagnostics. J Clin Microbiol 51(6):1834–1840CrossRef Schulthess B et al (2013) Identification of Gram-positive cocci by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: comparison of different preparation methods and implementation of a practical algorithm for routine diagnostics. J Clin Microbiol 51(6):1834–1840CrossRef
6.
go back to reference CLSI (2007) Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria; approved standard—seventh edition (M11-A7). Seventh ed. Vol. 27. CLSI CLSI (2007) Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria; approved standard—seventh edition (M11-A7). Seventh ed. Vol. 27. CLSI
7.
go back to reference Wust J, Hardegger U (1992) Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 11(12):1169–1173CrossRef Wust J, Hardegger U (1992) Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 11(12):1169–1173CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Citron DM et al (1991) Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 29(10):2197–2203CrossRef Citron DM et al (1991) Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 29(10):2197–2203CrossRef
9.
go back to reference EUCAST. The european committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 10.0, 2020. http://www.eucast.org EUCAST. The european committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 10.0, 2020. http://​www.​eucast.​org
10.
go back to reference Turnidge J, Kahlmeter G, Kronvall G (2006) Statistical characterisation of bacterial wild-type MIC value distributions and the determination of epidemiological cut-off values. Clin Microbiol Infect 12(5):418–425CrossRef Turnidge J, Kahlmeter G, Kronvall G (2006) Statistical characterisation of bacterial wild-type MIC value distributions and the determination of epidemiological cut-off values. Clin Microbiol Infect 12(5):418–425CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lauener FN, et al (2019) Genetic determinants and prediction of antibiotic resistance phenotypes in Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Med 8(1) Lauener FN, et al (2019) Genetic determinants and prediction of antibiotic resistance phenotypes in Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Med 8(1)
12.
go back to reference McArthur AG et al (2013) The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(7):3348–3357CrossRef McArthur AG et al (2013) The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(7):3348–3357CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Alifano P et al (2015) Rifampicin-resistance, rpoB polymorphism and RNA polymerase genetic engineering. J Biotechnol 202:60–77CrossRef Alifano P et al (2015) Rifampicin-resistance, rpoB polymorphism and RNA polymerase genetic engineering. J Biotechnol 202:60–77CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bernard L et al (2021) Antibiotic therapy for 6 or 12 weeks for prosthetic joint infection. N Engl J Med 384(21):1991–2001CrossRef Bernard L et al (2021) Antibiotic therapy for 6 or 12 weeks for prosthetic joint infection. N Engl J Med 384(21):1991–2001CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kusejko K et al (2021) The impact of surgical strategy and rifampin on treatment outcome in Cutibacterium periprosthetic joint infections. Clin InFect Dis 72(12):e1064–e1073CrossRef Kusejko K et al (2021) The impact of surgical strategy and rifampin on treatment outcome in Cutibacterium periprosthetic joint infections. Clin InFect Dis 72(12):e1064–e1073CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scapaticci M et al (2018) A case of necrotizing fasciitis caused by Finegoldia magna in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Infez Med 26(4):359–363PubMed Scapaticci M et al (2018) A case of necrotizing fasciitis caused by Finegoldia magna in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Infez Med 26(4):359–363PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cobo F et al (2019) Antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical findings of significant anaerobic bacteria in southern Spain. Anaerobe 59:49–53CrossRef Cobo F et al (2019) Antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical findings of significant anaerobic bacteria in southern Spain. Anaerobe 59:49–53CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Veloo ACM et al (2020) Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of anaerobic bacteria, isolated from human clinical specimens, within different European and surrounding countries. A joint ESGAI study. Anaerobe 61:102111CrossRef Veloo ACM et al (2020) Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of anaerobic bacteria, isolated from human clinical specimens, within different European and surrounding countries. A joint ESGAI study. Anaerobe 61:102111CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goldstein EJC, et al (2017) In vitro activities of pexiganan and 10 comparator antimicrobials against 502 anaerobic isolates recovered from skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61(12) Goldstein EJC, et al (2017) In vitro activities of pexiganan and 10 comparator antimicrobials against 502 anaerobic isolates recovered from skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61(12)
20.
go back to reference Hawser SP (2010) Activity of tigecycline and comparators against recent clinical isolates of Finegoldia magna from Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29(8):1011–1013CrossRef Hawser SP (2010) Activity of tigecycline and comparators against recent clinical isolates of Finegoldia magna from Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29(8):1011–1013CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Brazier J et al (2008) European surveillance study on antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31(4):316–320CrossRef Brazier J et al (2008) European surveillance study on antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31(4):316–320CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee Y et al (2015) Multicenter study of antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Korea in 2012. Ann Lab Med 35(5):479–486CrossRef Lee Y et al (2015) Multicenter study of antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Korea in 2012. Ann Lab Med 35(5):479–486CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Petrina MAB et al (2017) Susceptibility of bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated bacteria to secnidazole compared to metronidazole, tinidazole and clindamycin. Anaerobe 47:115–119CrossRef Petrina MAB et al (2017) Susceptibility of bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated bacteria to secnidazole compared to metronidazole, tinidazole and clindamycin. Anaerobe 47:115–119CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shilnikova II, Dmitrieva NV (2015) Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci isolated from cancer patients of the N N Blokhin Russian cancer research center. J Pathog 2015:648134CrossRef Shilnikova II, Dmitrieva NV (2015) Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci isolated from cancer patients of the N N Blokhin Russian cancer research center. J Pathog 2015:648134CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Goldstein EJ et al (2006) In vitro activity of ceftobiprole against aerobic and anaerobic strains isolated from diabetic foot infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(11):3959–3962CrossRef Goldstein EJ et al (2006) In vitro activity of ceftobiprole against aerobic and anaerobic strains isolated from diabetic foot infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(11):3959–3962CrossRef
26.
go back to reference AlBuhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A (2008) Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):915–919CrossRef AlBuhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A (2008) Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):915–919CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bratzler DW et al (2013) Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 70(3):195–283CrossRef Bratzler DW et al (2013) Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 70(3):195–283CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Veloo AC, Welling GW, Degener JE (2011) Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinically relevant Gram-positive anaerobic cocci collected over a three-year period in the Netherlands. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55(3):1199–1203CrossRef Veloo AC, Welling GW, Degener JE (2011) Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinically relevant Gram-positive anaerobic cocci collected over a three-year period in the Netherlands. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55(3):1199–1203CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mikamo H et al (2003) In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of telithromycin. Chemotherapy 49(1–2):62–65CrossRef Mikamo H et al (2003) In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of telithromycin. Chemotherapy 49(1–2):62–65CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goldstein EJ et al (2006) In vitro activities of dalbavancin and 12 other agents against 329 aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive isolates recovered from diabetic foot infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(8):2875–2879CrossRef Goldstein EJ et al (2006) In vitro activities of dalbavancin and 12 other agents against 329 aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive isolates recovered from diabetic foot infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(8):2875–2879CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is crucial when treating Finegoldia magna infections
Authors
Fabienne Walser
Julia Prinz
Stefan Rahm
Patrick O. Zingg
Stefano Mancini
Frank Imkamp
Reinhard Zbinden
Yvonne Achermann
Publication date
07-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Print ISSN: 0934-9723
Electronic ISSN: 1435-4373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04439-y