Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

The Tego™ needleless connector for hemodialysis catheters may protect against catheter colonization

Authors: M. Guembe, M. J. Pérez-Granda, R. Cruces, L. Alcalá, E. Bouza

Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Catheter connectors used in hemodialysis patients are those with open caps to manage high blood flows. However, current guidelines for the prevention of catheter infections recommend closed connectors. Tego™ is a closed connector designed to enable high blood flows. We used an in vitro model to compare the efficacy of Tego™ against contamination with that of standard caps in a real-life practice scenario. The model consisted of 200 blood culture bottles (BCB) with an inserted cannula closed either with Tego™ (100) or with open caps (100). BCB were manipulated using two different methods: under aseptic conditions and with gloves contaminated with a 0.05 McFarland Staphylococcus aureus solution. The BCB were incubated at 37 °C under continuous shaking for up to 7 days or until positive. When a BCB turned positive, 100 μL of the fluid was cultured. The positivity rate and time to positivity of the BCB in each method were compared. Overall, 4.0 % of BCB with Tego™ and 52.0 % of BCB with open caps were positive in the sterile model (p < 0.001), whereas all BCB in the contamination model were positive. We did not find differences regarding the median time (hours) to positivity between Tego™ and the standard cap in the contamination model (19.04 vs. 17.87, p = 0.465). In our model, Tego™ proved to be better than the standard cap for the prevention of contamination when the device was handled under optimal conditions. Moreover, it was as efficient as the standard catheter cap in the contamination model.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rojas L, Munoz P, Kestler M et al (2013) Bloodstream infections in patients with kidney disease: risk factors for poor outcome and mortality. J Hosp Infect 85(3):196–205CrossRefPubMed Rojas L, Munoz P, Kestler M et al (2013) Bloodstream infections in patients with kidney disease: risk factors for poor outcome and mortality. J Hosp Infect 85(3):196–205CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Silva TN, de Marchi D, Mendes ML et al (2014) Approach to prophylactic measures for central venous catheter-related infections in hemodialysis: a critical review. Hemodial Int 18(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed Silva TN, de Marchi D, Mendes ML et al (2014) Approach to prophylactic measures for central venous catheter-related infections in hemodialysis: a critical review. Hemodial Int 18(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gupta V, Yassin MH (2013) Infection and hemodialysis access: an updated review. Infect Disord Drug Targets 13(3):196–205CrossRefPubMed Gupta V, Yassin MH (2013) Infection and hemodialysis access: an updated review. Infect Disord Drug Targets 13(3):196–205CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim JS, Holtom P, Vigen C (2011) Reduction of catheter-related bloodstream infections through the use of a central venous line bundle: epidemiologic and economic consequences. Am J Infect Control 39(8):640–646CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Holtom P, Vigen C (2011) Reduction of catheter-related bloodstream infections through the use of a central venous line bundle: epidemiologic and economic consequences. Am J Infect Control 39(8):640–646CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shannon RP (2011) Eliminating hospital acquired infections: is it possible? Is it sustainable? Is it worth it? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 122:103–114PubMedPubMedCentral Shannon RP (2011) Eliminating hospital acquired infections: is it possible? Is it sustainable? Is it worth it? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 122:103–114PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Burden AR, Torjman MC, Jaffe JD et al (2012) Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: is it time to add simulation training to the prevention bundle? J Clin Anesth 24(7):555–560CrossRefPubMed Burden AR, Torjman MC, Jaffe JD et al (2012) Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: is it time to add simulation training to the prevention bundle? J Clin Anesth 24(7):555–560CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA et al (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 52(9):e162–e193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA et al (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 52(9):e162–e193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Rupp ME, Sholtz LA, Jourdan DR et al (2007) Outbreak of bloodstream infection temporally associated with the use of an intravascular needleless valve. Clin Infect Dis 44(11):1408–1414CrossRefPubMed Rupp ME, Sholtz LA, Jourdan DR et al (2007) Outbreak of bloodstream infection temporally associated with the use of an intravascular needleless valve. Clin Infect Dis 44(11):1408–1414CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Maragakis LL, Bradley KL, Song X et al (2006) Increased catheter-related bloodstream infection rates after the introduction of a new mechanical valve intravenous access port. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27(1):67–70CrossRefPubMed Maragakis LL, Bradley KL, Song X et al (2006) Increased catheter-related bloodstream infection rates after the introduction of a new mechanical valve intravenous access port. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27(1):67–70CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Guembe M, Pérez-Granda MJ, Alcalá L et al (2014) A simple and easy in vitro model to test the efficacy of IV lines’ needleless connectors against contamination. Intensive Care Med Exp 2:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guembe M, Pérez-Granda MJ, Alcalá L et al (2014) A simple and easy in vitro model to test the efficacy of IV lines’ needleless connectors against contamination. Intensive Care Med Exp 2:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Eloot S, De Vos JY, Hombrouckx R et al (2007) How much is catheter flow influenced by the use of closed luer lock access devices? Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(10):3061–3064CrossRefPubMed Eloot S, De Vos JY, Hombrouckx R et al (2007) How much is catheter flow influenced by the use of closed luer lock access devices? Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(10):3061–3064CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Brunelli SM, Njord L, Hunt AE et al (2014) Use of the Tego needlefree connector is associated with reduced incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis 7:131–139CrossRef Brunelli SM, Njord L, Hunt AE et al (2014) Use of the Tego needlefree connector is associated with reduced incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis 7:131–139CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bonkain F, Racape J, Goncalvez I et al (2013) Prevention of tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheter-related dysfunction and bacteremia by a neutral-valve closed-system connector: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 61(3):459–465CrossRefPubMed Bonkain F, Racape J, Goncalvez I et al (2013) Prevention of tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheter-related dysfunction and bacteremia by a neutral-valve closed-system connector: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 61(3):459–465CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Erb S, Widmer AF, Tschudin-Sutter S et al (2013) Impact of different catheter lock strategies on bacterial colonization of permanent central venous hemodialysis catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34(12):1314–1317CrossRefPubMed Erb S, Widmer AF, Tschudin-Sutter S et al (2013) Impact of different catheter lock strategies on bacterial colonization of permanent central venous hemodialysis catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34(12):1314–1317CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Tego™ needleless connector for hemodialysis catheters may protect against catheter colonization
Authors
M. Guembe
M. J. Pérez-Granda
R. Cruces
L. Alcalá
E. Bouza
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0934-9723
Electronic ISSN: 1435-4373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2670-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 8/2016 Go to the issue