Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Sciences 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Comparison of brainstem reflex recordings and evoked potentials with clinical and MRI data to assess brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a short-term follow-up

Authors: I. Magnano, G. M. Pes, M. P. Cabboi, G. Pilurzi, F. Ginatempo, A. Achene, A. Salis, M. Conti, Franca Deriu

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Brainstem dysfunctions are associated to high risk of developing severe disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), often undetected by conventional routine assessments. In this view, the purpose of this study was to monitor brainstem function over a short-term period in PwMS, comparing clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations with evoked potentials (EPs) and brainstem reflexes (BSRs). Forty-five PwMS were evaluated at baseline and after 15.1 ± 4.2 months through Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, MRI, EPs, vestibulo-masseteric (VMR), acoustic-masseteric (AMR), vestibulo-collic (VCR) and trigemino-collic (TCR) reflexes. At baseline, brainstem alterations were detected by EDSS, MRI, EPs and BSRs in 40, 77.8, 84.4 and 82.2 % of patients, respectively. At follow-up, EDSS and MRI remained unchanged, while EP and BSR deteriorated in 86.7 and 91.1 % of patients, respectively. Changes from 1 to 3 altered EPs and from 1 to 4 altered BSRs were significant only for EPs (p = 0.028). The analysis of grading severity for each test disclosed significant worsening of the VMR, AMR, TCR and P14 wave of the median somatosensory EP. Combined EP/BSR recordings were significantly more sensitive than paired EDSS/MRI assessments at baseline (93.3 versus 80 %; p = 0.006) and follow-up (97.8 versus 82.2 %; p = 0.008). In the short-term VMR, AMR, TCR and P14 wave disclosed a significant functional brainstem deterioration by detecting lesions that remained clinically and MRI silent. Our findings provide evidence for a valuable role of neurophysiological methods, especially BSRs, in investigating and monitoring brainstem dysfunctions in MS, in comparison with the standard clinical and MRI procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Filippi M, Rocca MA, De Stefano N et al (2011) Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 68:1514–1520CrossRefPubMed Filippi M, Rocca MA, De Stefano N et al (2011) Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 68:1514–1520CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245CrossRefPubMed Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Comi G, Martinelli V, Locatelli T et al (1998) Neurophysiological and cognitive markers of disease evolution in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 4:260–265CrossRefPubMed Comi G, Martinelli V, Locatelli T et al (1998) Neurophysiological and cognitive markers of disease evolution in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 4:260–265CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Minneboo A, Barkhof F, Polman CH et al (2004) Infratentorial lesions predict long-term disability in patients with initial findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 61:217–221CrossRefPubMed Minneboo A, Barkhof F, Polman CH et al (2004) Infratentorial lesions predict long-term disability in patients with initial findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 61:217–221CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Patkó T, Simó M, Arányi Z (2007) Vestibular click-evoked myogenic potentials: sensitivity and factors determining abnormality in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13:193–198CrossRefPubMed Patkó T, Simó M, Arányi Z (2007) Vestibular click-evoked myogenic potentials: sensitivity and factors determining abnormality in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13:193–198CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gabelić T, Krbot Skorić M, Adamec I et al (2015) The vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) score: a promising tool for evaluation of brainstem involvement in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 22:261–269CrossRefPubMed Gabelić T, Krbot Skorić M, Adamec I et al (2015) The vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) score: a promising tool for evaluation of brainstem involvement in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 22:261–269CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rosengren SM, Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG (2010) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol 121:636–651CrossRefPubMed Rosengren SM, Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG (2010) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol 121:636–651CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Magnano I, Pes GM, Pilurzi G et al (2014) Exploring brainstem function in multiple sclerosis by combining brainstem reflexes, evoked potentials, clinical and MRI investigations. Clin Neurophysiol 125:2286–2296CrossRefPubMed Magnano I, Pes GM, Pilurzi G et al (2014) Exploring brainstem function in multiple sclerosis by combining brainstem reflexes, evoked potentials, clinical and MRI investigations. Clin Neurophysiol 125:2286–2296CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Leocani L, Rovaris M, Boneschi FM et al (2006) Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1030–1035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leocani L, Rovaris M, Boneschi FM et al (2006) Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1030–1035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Invernizzi P, Bertolasi L, Bianchi MR et al (2011) Prognostic value of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the EP score. J Neurol 258:1933–1939CrossRefPubMed Invernizzi P, Bertolasi L, Bianchi MR et al (2011) Prognostic value of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the EP score. J Neurol 258:1933–1939CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR et al (2008) Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 131:808–817CrossRefPubMed Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR et al (2008) Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 131:808–817CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Deuschl G, Eisen A (1999) Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 52:192–211 Deuschl G, Eisen A (1999) Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 52:192–211
14.
go back to reference Restuccia D (2000) Anatomic origin of P13 and P14 scalp far-field potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:246–257CrossRefPubMed Restuccia D (2000) Anatomic origin of P13 and P14 scalp far-field potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:246–257CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Eleftheriadou A, Deftereos S, Zarikas V et al (2009) Test-retest reliability of p13n23 and n34p44 components of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in a large healthy population. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 38:462–467PubMed Eleftheriadou A, Deftereos S, Zarikas V et al (2009) Test-retest reliability of p13n23 and n34p44 components of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in a large healthy population. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 38:462–467PubMed
16.
go back to reference Alpini D, Pugnetti L, Caputo D et al (2004) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis: clinical and imaging correlations. Mult Scler 10:316–321CrossRefPubMed Alpini D, Pugnetti L, Caputo D et al (2004) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis: clinical and imaging correlations. Mult Scler 10:316–321CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gazioglu S, Boz C (2012) Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Neurophysiol 123:1872–1879CrossRefPubMed Gazioglu S, Boz C (2012) Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Neurophysiol 123:1872–1879CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pittock SJ, McClelland RL, Mayr WT et al (2004) Clinical implications of benign multiple sclerosis: a 20-year population-based follow-up study. Ann Neurol 56:303–306CrossRefPubMed Pittock SJ, McClelland RL, Mayr WT et al (2004) Clinical implications of benign multiple sclerosis: a 20-year population-based follow-up study. Ann Neurol 56:303–306CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Deriu F, Tolu E, Rothwell JC (2005) A sound-evoked vestibulo-masseteric reflex in healthy humans. J Neurophysiol 93:2739–2751CrossRefPubMed Deriu F, Tolu E, Rothwell JC (2005) A sound-evoked vestibulo-masseteric reflex in healthy humans. J Neurophysiol 93:2739–2751CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Deriu F, Giaconi E, Rothwell JC et al (2010) Reflex responses of masseter muscles to sound. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1690–1699CrossRefPubMed Deriu F, Giaconi E, Rothwell JC et al (2010) Reflex responses of masseter muscles to sound. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1690–1699CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lee EK, Seyal M (1998) Generators of short latency human somatosensory-evoked potentials recorded over the spine and scalp. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:227–234CrossRefPubMed Lee EK, Seyal M (1998) Generators of short latency human somatosensory-evoked potentials recorded over the spine and scalp. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:227–234CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Yamada T (2000) Neuroanatomic substrates of lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:269–279CrossRefPubMed Yamada T (2000) Neuroanatomic substrates of lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:269–279CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference De Natale ER, Ginatempo F, Paulus KS et al (2015) Abnormalities of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease are associated with clinical evidence of brainstem involvement. Neurol Sci 36:995–1001CrossRefPubMed De Natale ER, Ginatempo F, Paulus KS et al (2015) Abnormalities of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease are associated with clinical evidence of brainstem involvement. Neurol Sci 36:995–1001CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chiappa KH (1980) Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory and short latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 30:110–123CrossRefPubMed Chiappa KH (1980) Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory and short latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 30:110–123CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of brainstem reflex recordings and evoked potentials with clinical and MRI data to assess brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a short-term follow-up
Authors
I. Magnano
G. M. Pes
M. P. Cabboi
G. Pilurzi
F. Ginatempo
A. Achene
A. Salis
M. Conti
Franca Deriu
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Neurological Sciences / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2604-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Neurological Sciences 9/2016 Go to the issue