Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 12/2021

01-12-2021 | Telemedicine | Original Article

Ability and willingness to utilize telemedicine among rheumatology patients—a cross-sectional survey

Authors: Steve S. Kong, Lilian A. Otalora Rojas, Amnie Ashour, Mathew Robinson, Tyler Hosterman, Neha Bhanusali

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction/objectives

This study aims to assess the patients’ ability and willingness to utilize telemedicine (TM) along with identifying some of the barriers to a more widespread adoption of TM in rheumatology.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional study of patients visiting a rheumatology clinic was conducted in 2018. We used a survey to assess patients’ attitude on the perceived effectiveness when comparing TM versus in-person visits, as well as patients’ access to technology, distance traveled by the patient to attend the clinic visit, and demographic parameters.

Results

A total of 214 patients were included. Negative correlations were found between the increase in age and access to technologies (front-facing camera (mean age difference − 12.8), telephone (mean age difference − 14.4), and stable internet connection (mean age difference − 15.1)), as well as believing that their needs could be met through TM (r − .224, p < 0.001) and thinking that TM could be an appropriate alternative method of healthcare (r − .298, p < 0.001). Younger patients reported more conflict between appointments and work hours (mean age difference − 11.73). Follow-up patients were more likely to feel that their visit could have been possible over the phone (mean difference − 1.13) or video conferencing (mean difference − 1.13) compared to new patients. Older patients were less likely to think that the purpose of their rheumatology visits could be achieved over the phone (r − .207, p = 0.003) or video conferencing (r − .331, p = 0.001). The further the distance traveled, the more the patients were willing to utilize TM compared to in-person visits (r 0.167, p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Out of necessity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, rheumatology clinics are increasingly turning to TM. The results of this study suggest that access and familiarity with technology may still be limited in certain demographics, particularly the elderly. Furthermore, this study helps to understand some of the additional barriers to more widespread adoption and patients’ perceived limitations of TM.
Key Points
This study aimed to assess rheumatology patients’ willingness to utilize telemedicine (TM) while determining the factors and barriers that may exist for a more widespread adoption of TM, using a cross-sectional survey in the setting of a rheumatologic clinic.
The age of the patient was the most significant contributing factor in a patient’s perception of TM, with older patients being less likely to think that the purpose of their rheumatology visits could be achieved over the phone or via videoconferencing.
The social trend of limited access to technology among the elderly population was reinforced by the results in this study.
Patients who had a greater commute to the clinic were more likely to willing to utilize TM consultations.
The results of this study highlight the elevated difficulty elderly patient populations have in utilizing TM.
With the current outbreak of COVID-19, the importance of utilizing TM specifically among the elderly population could prove vital. Future studies to focus on the elderly population and methods for helping these patients become familiar with TM would be beneficial.
Studies such as this can help to orchestrate future guidelines for TM in the field of rheumatology. Based on our study results, the new-patient encounter should be an in-person face-to-face encounter whenever possible, followed by TM visits for established patients who are able and open to using it, depending on the diagnosis and symptoms of the individual patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ryu S (2012) Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009 (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, Volume 2). Healthcare Informatics Research 18(2):153–155CrossRef Ryu S (2012) Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009 (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, Volume 2). Healthcare Informatics Research 18(2):153–155CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dorsey ER, Topol EJ (2020) Telemedicine 2020 and the next decade. Lancet 395(10227):859CrossRef Dorsey ER, Topol EJ (2020) Telemedicine 2020 and the next decade. Lancet 395(10227):859CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wu G, Keyes LM (2006) Group tele-exercise for improving balance in elders. Telemed J E Health 12(5):561–570CrossRef Wu G, Keyes LM (2006) Group tele-exercise for improving balance in elders. Telemed J E Health 12(5):561–570CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vismara LA, McCormick C, Young GS, Nadhan A, Monlux K (2013) Preliminary findings of a telehealth approach to parent training in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 43(12):2953–2969CrossRef Vismara LA, McCormick C, Young GS, Nadhan A, Monlux K (2013) Preliminary findings of a telehealth approach to parent training in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 43(12):2953–2969CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vimalananda VG, Gupte G, Seraj SM, Orlander J, Berlowitz D, Fincke BG et al (2015) Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare 21(6):323–330CrossRef Vimalananda VG, Gupte G, Seraj SM, Orlander J, Berlowitz D, Fincke BG et al (2015) Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare 21(6):323–330CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Piga M, Cangemi I, Mathieu A, Cauli A (2017) Telemedicine for patients with rheumatic diseases: systematic review and proposal for research agenda. Semin Arthritis Rheum 47(1):121–128CrossRef Piga M, Cangemi I, Mathieu A, Cauli A (2017) Telemedicine for patients with rheumatic diseases: systematic review and proposal for research agenda. Semin Arthritis Rheum 47(1):121–128CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E (2020) Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 22(2):e16407-eCrossRef Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E (2020) Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 22(2):e16407-eCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leggett P, Graham L, Steele K, Gilliland A, Stevenson M, O’Reilly D et al (2001) Telerheumatology–diagnostic accuracy and acceptability to patient, specialist, and general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract 51(470):746–748PubMedPubMedCentral Leggett P, Graham L, Steele K, Gilliland A, Stevenson M, O’Reilly D et al (2001) Telerheumatology–diagnostic accuracy and acceptability to patient, specialist, and general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract 51(470):746–748PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Wood PR, Caplan L (2019) Outcomes, satisfaction, and costs of a rheumatology telemedicine program: a longitudinal evaluation. J Clin Rheumatol 25(1):41–44CrossRef Wood PR, Caplan L (2019) Outcomes, satisfaction, and costs of a rheumatology telemedicine program: a longitudinal evaluation. J Clin Rheumatol 25(1):41–44CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Davis P, Howard R, Brockway P (2001) An evaluation of telehealth in the provision of rhematologic consults to a remote area. J Rheumatol 28:1910–1913PubMed Davis P, Howard R, Brockway P (2001) An evaluation of telehealth in the provision of rhematologic consults to a remote area. J Rheumatol 28:1910–1913PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kruse C, Betancourt J, Ortiz S, Valdes Luna SM, Bamrah IK, Segovia N (2019) Barriers to the use of mobile health in improving health outcomes in developing countries: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21(10):e13263CrossRef Kruse C, Betancourt J, Ortiz S, Valdes Luna SM, Bamrah IK, Segovia N (2019) Barriers to the use of mobile health in improving health outcomes in developing countries: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21(10):e13263CrossRef
14.
go back to reference FitzGerald JD, Battistone M, Brown CR Jr et al (2013) Regional distribution of adult rheumatologists. Arthritis Rheum 65(12):3017–3025CrossRef FitzGerald JD, Battistone M, Brown CR Jr et al (2013) Regional distribution of adult rheumatologists. Arthritis Rheum 65(12):3017–3025CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lam NC, Ghetu MV, Bieniek ML (2016) Systemic lupus erythematosus: primary care approach to diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 94(4):284–294PubMed Lam NC, Ghetu MV, Bieniek ML (2016) Systemic lupus erythematosus: primary care approach to diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 94(4):284–294PubMed
16.
go back to reference Osborn J, Ajakaiye A, Cooksley T, Subbe CP (2020) Do mHealth applications improve clinical outcomes of patients with cancer? A critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed literature. Support Care Cancer 28(3):1469–1479CrossRef Osborn J, Ajakaiye A, Cooksley T, Subbe CP (2020) Do mHealth applications improve clinical outcomes of patients with cancer? A critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed literature. Support Care Cancer 28(3):1469–1479CrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’Cathail M, Sivanandan MA, Diver C, Patel P, Christian J (2020) The use of patient-facing teleconsultations in the National Health Service: scoping review. JMIR Med Inform 8(3):e15380CrossRef O’Cathail M, Sivanandan MA, Diver C, Patel P, Christian J (2020) The use of patient-facing teleconsultations in the National Health Service: scoping review. JMIR Med Inform 8(3):e15380CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D (2001) Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ 165(6):765–771PubMedPubMedCentral Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D (2001) Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ 165(6):765–771PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Caffery LJ, Farjian M, Smith AC (2016) Telehealth interventions for reducing waiting lists and waiting times for specialist outpatient services: a scoping review. J Telemed Telecare 22(8):504–512CrossRef Caffery LJ, Farjian M, Smith AC (2016) Telehealth interventions for reducing waiting lists and waiting times for specialist outpatient services: a scoping review. J Telemed Telecare 22(8):504–512CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ability and willingness to utilize telemedicine among rheumatology patients—a cross-sectional survey
Authors
Steve S. Kong
Lilian A. Otalora Rojas
Amnie Ashour
Mathew Robinson
Tyler Hosterman
Neha Bhanusali
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Telemedicine
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05759-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Clinical Rheumatology 12/2021 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.