Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 11/2019

01-11-2019 | Original Article

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation

Authors: Zeynep Hazar Kanik, Omer Osman Pala, Gul Oznur Karabicak, Seyit Citaker

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) is a joint-specific, self-administered outcome measure used to determine the level of pain and disability in patients with various elbow pathologies. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the PREE into Turkish (PREE-T) and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with elbow disorders were included in the present study. The original version of the PREE was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish by following standard procedure. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Construct validity of PREE-T was determined with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis. Floor and ceiling effects were also analyzed.

Results

A high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.959) and an excellent test-retest reliability (the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.970) indicated that the PREE-T was reliable. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed in sub-parameters (0–1.7%) and the total score (0%) of PREE-T. Correlation coefficients between the PREE-T total score and DASH disability/symptom and work sub-parameters were 0.636 and 0.461, respectively. PREE-T pain and function sub-parameters correlated with related sub-parameters of the SF-36 bodily pain (r = − 0.721) and physical functioning (r = − 0.263).

Conclusion

The Turkish version of the PREE is a valid and reliable outcome measure for assessing patients with elbow disorders. It is recommended to be used in research and clinical settings.
Key Points
The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation was successfully translated into Turkish and validated in a population with various elbow pathologies according to established guidelines
The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation has high internal consistency and test-retest values
The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation is valid and reliable
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, O’Neill R, Kennedy DL (2007) Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 10(Suppl 2):125–137CrossRef Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, O’Neill R, Kennedy DL (2007) Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 10(Suppl 2):125–137CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull 87(1):131–161CrossRef Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull 87(1):131–161CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2013) Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43(4):263–274CrossRef Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2013) Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43(4):263–274CrossRef
4.
go back to reference MacDermid JC (2001) Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 14(2):105–114CrossRef MacDermid JC (2001) Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 14(2):105–114CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2015) Linking of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow questionnaire (pASES-e) to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and Hand Core Sets. J Hand Ther 28(1):61–67CrossRef Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2015) Linking of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow questionnaire (pASES-e) to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and Hand Core Sets. J Hand Ther 28(1):61–67CrossRef
6.
go back to reference John M, Angst F, Pap G, Junge A, Mannion AF (2007) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25(2):195–205PubMed John M, Angst F, Pap G, Junge A, Mannion AF (2007) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25(2):195–205PubMed
7.
go back to reference Beauchemin G, MacDermid JC, Bourduas K, Poirier MF, Gaudelli C, Rouleau DM (2015) Translation and validation of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) to a French version. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(4):405–409CrossRef Beauchemin G, MacDermid JC, Bourduas K, Poirier MF, Gaudelli C, Rouleau DM (2015) Translation and validation of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) to a French version. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(4):405–409CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hanyu T, Watanabe M, Masatomi T, Nishida K, Nakagawa T, Nishiura Y, Ohi H (2013) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation. J Orthop Sci 18(5):712–719CrossRef Hanyu T, Watanabe M, Masatomi T, Nishida K, Nakagawa T, Nishiura Y, Ohi H (2013) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation. J Orthop Sci 18(5):712–719CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Farazdaghi MR, Mansoori A, Vosoughi O, Kordi Yoosefinejad A (2017) Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 37(5):743–750CrossRef Farazdaghi MR, Mansoori A, Vosoughi O, Kordi Yoosefinejad A (2017) Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 37(5):743–750CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, Yörükan S, Bilgütay BS, Ayhan Ç, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H, Kırdı N, Yakut Y, Güler Ç (2006) Kol, omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 17(3):99–107 Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, Yörükan S, Bilgütay BS, Ayhan Ç, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H, Kırdı N, Yakut Y, Güler Ç (2006) Kol, omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 17(3):99–107
12.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pinar R (2005) Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14(1):259–264CrossRef Pinar R (2005) Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14(1):259–264CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fleiss JL (1986) Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL (ed) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 1–32 Fleiss JL (1986) Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL (ed) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 1–32
15.
go back to reference Feise RJ, Michael Menke J (2001) Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(1):78–86CrossRef Feise RJ, Michael Menke J (2001) Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(1):78–86CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hazar Kanik Z, Gunaydin G, Pala OO, Sozlu U, Alkan ZB, Citaker S, Basar S, Kanatli U (2018) Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Penn Shoulder Score. Disabil Rehabil 40(10):1214–1219 Hazar Kanik Z, Gunaydin G, Pala OO, Sozlu U, Alkan ZB, Citaker S, Basar S, Kanatli U (2018) Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Penn Shoulder Score. Disabil Rehabil 40(10):1214–1219​
17.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation
Authors
Zeynep Hazar Kanik
Omer Osman Pala
Gul Oznur Karabicak
Seyit Citaker
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04665-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

Clinical Rheumatology 11/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.