Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Reliability of ultrasound grading traditional score and new global OMERACT-EULAR score system (GLOESS): results from an inter- and intra-reading exercise by rheumatologists

Authors: Lucio Ventura-Ríos, Cristina Hernández-Díaz, Diana Ferrusquia-Toríz, Esteban Cruz-Arenas, Pedro Rodríguez-Henríquez, Ana Laura Alvarez del Castillo, Alfredo Campaña-Parra, Efrén Canul, Gerardo Guerrero Yeo, Juan Jorge Mendoza-Ruiz, Mario Pérez Cristóbal, Sandra Sicsik, Karina Silva Luna, on behalf of the Grupo Mexicano de Ecografía Musculoesquelética AC (ECOMER)

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aims to test the reliability of ultrasound to graduate synovitis in static and video images, evaluating separately grayscale and power Doppler (PD), and combined. Thirteen trained rheumatologist ultrasonographers participated in two separate rounds reading 42 images, 15 static and 27 videos, of the 7-joint count [wrist, 2nd and 3rd metacarpophalangeal (MCP), 2nd and 3rd interphalangeal (IPP), 2nd and 5th metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints]. The images were from six patients with rheumatoid arthritis, performed by one ultrasonographer. Synovitis definition was according to OMERACT. Scoring system in grayscale, PD separately, and combined (GLOESS—Global OMERACT-EULAR Score System) were reviewed before exercise. Reliability intra- and inter-reading was calculated with Cohen’s kappa weighted, according to Landis and Koch. Kappa values for inter-reading were good to excellent. The minor kappa was for GLOESS in static images, and the highest was for the same scoring in videos (k 0.59 and 0.85, respectively). Excellent values were obtained for static PD in 5th MTP joint and for PD video in 2nd MTP joint. Results for GLOESS in general were good to moderate. Poor agreement was observed in 3rd MCP and 3rd IPP in all kinds of images. Intra-reading agreement were greater in grayscale and GLOESS in static images than in videos (k 0.86 vs. 0.77 and k 0.86 vs. 0.71, respectively), but PD was greater in videos than in static images (k 1.0 vs. 0.79). The reliability of the synovitis scoring through static images and videos is in general good to moderate when using grayscale and PD separately or combined.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Ohrndorf S, Werner C, Schirmer C, Detert J et al (2006) Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 65:595–600CrossRefPubMed Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Ohrndorf S, Werner C, Schirmer C, Detert J et al (2006) Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 65:595–600CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M (2004) Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum 50:2103–2112CrossRefPubMed Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M (2004) Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum 50:2103–2112CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cheung PP, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gossec L, Paternotte S, Le Bourlout C, Mazieres M et al (2010) Reliability of patient self-evaluation of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison study with ultrasonography, physician, and nurse assessments. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62:1112–1119CrossRef Cheung PP, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gossec L, Paternotte S, Le Bourlout C, Mazieres M et al (2010) Reliability of patient self-evaluation of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison study with ultrasonography, physician, and nurse assessments. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62:1112–1119CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J, Wolf KJ et al (1999) Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 42:1232–1245CrossRefPubMed Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J, Wolf KJ et al (1999) Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 42:1232–1245CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kane D, Balint PV, Sturrock RD (2003) Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 30:966–971PubMed Kane D, Balint PV, Sturrock RD (2003) Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 30:966–971PubMed
6.
go back to reference D’Agostino MA, Boers M, Wakefield RJ, Emery P, Conaghan PG (2017) Is it time to revisit the role of ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis management? Ann Rheum Dis 76:7–8CrossRefPubMed D’Agostino MA, Boers M, Wakefield RJ, Emery P, Conaghan PG (2017) Is it time to revisit the role of ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis management? Ann Rheum Dis 76:7–8CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Funck-Brentano T, Gandjbakhch F, Etchepare F, Jousse-Joulin S, Miquel A, Cyteval C et al (2013) Prediction of radiographic damage in early arthritis by sonographic erosions and power Doppler signal: a longitudinal observational study. Arthritis Care Res 65:896–902CrossRef Funck-Brentano T, Gandjbakhch F, Etchepare F, Jousse-Joulin S, Miquel A, Cyteval C et al (2013) Prediction of radiographic damage in early arthritis by sonographic erosions and power Doppler signal: a longitudinal observational study. Arthritis Care Res 65:896–902CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dougados M, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Ferlet JF, Jousse-Joulin S, D’Agostino MA, Backhaus M et al (2013) The ability of synovitis to predict structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study between clinical examination and ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis 72:665–671CrossRefPubMed Dougados M, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Ferlet JF, Jousse-Joulin S, D’Agostino MA, Backhaus M et al (2013) The ability of synovitis to predict structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study between clinical examination and ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis 72:665–671CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Macchioni P, Magnani M, Mulè R, Galletti S, Catanoso M, Pignotti E et al (2013) Ultrasonographic predictors for the development of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a single joint prospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 31:8–17PubMed Macchioni P, Magnani M, Mulè R, Galletti S, Catanoso M, Pignotti E et al (2013) Ultrasonographic predictors for the development of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a single joint prospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 31:8–17PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ten Cate DF, Luime JJ, van der Ven M, Hazes JMW, Kooiman K, de Jong N et al (2013) Very different performance of the power Doppler modalities of several ultrasound machines ascertained by a microvessel flow phantom. Arthritis Res Ther 15:R162. doi:10.1186/ar4345 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ten Cate DF, Luime JJ, van der Ven M, Hazes JMW, Kooiman K, de Jong N et al (2013) Very different performance of the power Doppler modalities of several ultrasound machines ascertained by a microvessel flow phantom. Arthritis Res Ther 15:R162. doi:10.​1186/​ar4345 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A (2005) Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 64:375–381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A (2005) Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 64:375–381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Naredo E, Wakefield R, Iagnocco A, Terslec L, Filippucci E, Gandjbakhch F et al (2011) The OMERACT ultrasound task force—status and perspectives. J Rheumatol 38:2063–2067CrossRefPubMed Naredo E, Wakefield R, Iagnocco A, Terslec L, Filippucci E, Gandjbakhch F et al (2011) The OMERACT ultrasound task force—status and perspectives. J Rheumatol 38:2063–2067CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D’Agostino MA, Grassi W et al (2012) Metrologic properties of ultrasound versus clinical evaluation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum 64:1272–1282CrossRefPubMed Mandl P, Balint PV, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D’Agostino MA, Grassi W et al (2012) Metrologic properties of ultrasound versus clinical evaluation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum 64:1272–1282CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Østergaard M, Szkudlarek M (2005) Ultrasonography: a valid method for assessing rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 52:681–686CrossRefPubMed Østergaard M, Szkudlarek M (2005) Ultrasonography: a valid method for assessing rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 52:681–686CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M (2001) Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 44:2018–2023CrossRefPubMed Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M (2001) Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 44:2018–2023CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mandl P, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, D’Agostino MA (2011) A systematic literature review analysis of ultrasound joint count and scoring systems to assess synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis according to the OMERACT filter. J Rheumatol 38:2055–2062CrossRefPubMed Mandl P, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, D’Agostino MA (2011) A systematic literature review analysis of ultrasound joint count and scoring systems to assess synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis according to the OMERACT filter. J Rheumatol 38:2055–2062CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mandl P, Kurucz R, Niedermayer D, Balint PV, Smolen JS (2014) Contributions of ultrasound beyond clinical data in assessing inflammatory disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: current insights and future prospects. Rheumatology 53:2136–2142CrossRefPubMed Mandl P, Kurucz R, Niedermayer D, Balint PV, Smolen JS (2014) Contributions of ultrasound beyond clinical data in assessing inflammatory disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: current insights and future prospects. Rheumatology 53:2136–2142CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Naredo E, Rodriguez M, Campos C, Rodríguez-Heredia JM, Medina JA, Giner E et al (2008) Validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of a twelve joint simplified power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 59:515–522CrossRefPubMed Naredo E, Rodriguez M, Campos C, Rodríguez-Heredia JM, Medina JA, Giner E et al (2008) Validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of a twelve joint simplified power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 59:515–522CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M, Hakulinen U, Heikkinen JO, Hermunen H et al (2006) Assessing the intra and inter-reader reliability of dynamic ultrasound images in power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 65:1658–1660CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M, Hakulinen U, Heikkinen JO, Hermunen H et al (2006) Assessing the intra and inter-reader reliability of dynamic ultrasound images in power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 65:1658–1660CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Vlad V, Berghea F, Iagnocco A, Micu M, Damjanov N, Skakic V et al (2014) Inter & intra-observer reliability of grading ultrasound videoclips with hand pathology in rheumatoid arthritis by using non-sophisticated internet tools (LUMINA study). Med Ultrason 16:32–36CrossRefPubMed Vlad V, Berghea F, Iagnocco A, Micu M, Damjanov N, Skakic V et al (2014) Inter & intra-observer reliability of grading ultrasound videoclips with hand pathology in rheumatoid arthritis by using non-sophisticated internet tools (LUMINA study). Med Ultrason 16:32–36CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus M, Hartung W et al (2009) Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Car Res 61:1194–1201CrossRef Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus M, Hartung W et al (2009) Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Car Res 61:1194–1201CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, Grassi W, Machold KP, Swen WA et al (2001) Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 60:641–649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, Grassi W, Machold KP, Swen WA et al (2001) Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 60:641–649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd et al (2010) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581CrossRefPubMed Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd et al (2010) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wakefield R, Balint P, Skudlarek M, Filippuci E, Backhaus M, D’Agostino MA et al (2005) Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 32:2485–2487PubMed Wakefield R, Balint P, Skudlarek M, Filippuci E, Backhaus M, D’Agostino MA et al (2005) Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 32:2485–2487PubMed
25.
go back to reference Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomen HS, Østergaard M (2003) Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:955–962CrossRefPubMed Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomen HS, Østergaard M (2003) Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:955–962CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference D’Agostino MA, Boers M, Wakefield RJ, Hammer HB, Vittecoq O, Filippou G et al (2016) Exploring a new ultrasound score as a clinical predictive tool in patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting abatacept: results from the APPRAISE study. RMD Open 2016 2(1):e000237. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000237 D’Agostino MA, Boers M, Wakefield RJ, Hammer HB, Vittecoq O, Filippou G et al (2016) Exploring a new ultrasound score as a clinical predictive tool in patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting abatacept: results from the APPRAISE study. RMD Open 2016 2(1):e000237. doi:10.​1136/​rmdopen-2015-000237
27.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174 Landis JR, Koch GG. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
28.
go back to reference Ventura-Ríos L, Navarro-Compan V, Aliste M, Alva Linares M, Areny R, Audisio M et al (2016) Is entheses ultrasound reliable? A reading Latin American exercise. Clin Rheumatol 35:1353–1357CrossRefPubMed Ventura-Ríos L, Navarro-Compan V, Aliste M, Alva Linares M, Areny R, Audisio M et al (2016) Is entheses ultrasound reliable? A reading Latin American exercise. Clin Rheumatol 35:1353–1357CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Rezaei H, Klint A, Erik HHB, Terslev L, D’Agostino MA, Kisten Y et al (2017) Analysis of correlation and causes for discrepancy between quantitative and semi-quantitative Doppler scores in synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 56:255–262CrossRefPubMed Rezaei H, Klint A, Erik HHB, Terslev L, D’Agostino MA, Kisten Y et al (2017) Analysis of correlation and causes for discrepancy between quantitative and semi-quantitative Doppler scores in synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 56:255–262CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lee V, Zayat A, Wakefield RJ (2009) The effect of joint position on Doppler flow in finger synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 68:603–604CrossRefPubMed Lee V, Zayat A, Wakefield RJ (2009) The effect of joint position on Doppler flow in finger synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 68:603–604CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ellegaard K, Torp-Pedersen S, Henriksen M et al (2009) Influence of recent exercise and skin temperature on ultrasound Doppler measurements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—an intervention study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48:1520–1523CrossRef Ellegaard K, Torp-Pedersen S, Henriksen M et al (2009) Influence of recent exercise and skin temperature on ultrasound Doppler measurements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—an intervention study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48:1520–1523CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Grassi W et al (2010) Intratendinous power Doppler changes related to patient position in seronegative spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 37:1057–1059CrossRefPubMed Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Grassi W et al (2010) Intratendinous power Doppler changes related to patient position in seronegative spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 37:1057–1059CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Cheung P, Dougados M, Gossec L (2010) Reliability of ultrasonography to detect synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review of 35 studies (1,415 patients). Arthritis Car Res 62:323–334CrossRef Cheung P, Dougados M, Gossec L (2010) Reliability of ultrasonography to detect synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review of 35 studies (1,415 patients). Arthritis Car Res 62:323–334CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lage-Hansen PR, Lindegarrd H, Chrysidis S, Terslev L (2017) The role of ultrasound in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis, what do we know? An updated review. Rheumatol Int 37:179–187CrossRefPubMed Lage-Hansen PR, Lindegarrd H, Chrysidis S, Terslev L (2017) The role of ultrasound in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis, what do we know? An updated review. Rheumatol Int 37:179–187CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Freeston JE, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Hensor EM, Stewart SP, Emery P (2010) A diagnostic algorithm for persistence of very early inflammatory arthritis: the utility of power Doppler ultrasound when added to conventional assessment tools. Ann Rheum Dis 69:417–419CrossRefPubMed Freeston JE, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Hensor EM, Stewart SP, Emery P (2010) A diagnostic algorithm for persistence of very early inflammatory arthritis: the utility of power Doppler ultrasound when added to conventional assessment tools. Ann Rheum Dis 69:417–419CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Ohrndorf S, Fischer U, Kellner H, Strunk J, Hartung W, Reiche B et al (2012) Reliability of the novel 7-joint ultrasound score: results from an inter- and intraobserver study performed by rheumatologists. Arthritis Care Res 64:1238–1243 Ohrndorf S, Fischer U, Kellner H, Strunk J, Hartung W, Reiche B et al (2012) Reliability of the novel 7-joint ultrasound score: results from an inter- and intraobserver study performed by rheumatologists. Arthritis Care Res 64:1238–1243
37.
go back to reference Brulhart L, Ziswiler HR, Tamborrini G, Zufferey P (2015) SONAR/SCQM programmes. The importance of sonographer experience and machine quality with regards to the role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in routine care of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33:98–101PubMed Brulhart L, Ziswiler HR, Tamborrini G, Zufferey P (2015) SONAR/SCQM programmes. The importance of sonographer experience and machine quality with regards to the role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in routine care of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33:98–101PubMed
38.
go back to reference Cheung PP, Kong KO, Chew LC, Chia F, Giap W, Lian YK et al (2014) Achieving consensus in ultrasonography synovitis scoring in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 17:776–781CrossRefPubMed Cheung PP, Kong KO, Chew LC, Chia F, Giap W, Lian YK et al (2014) Achieving consensus in ultrasonography synovitis scoring in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 17:776–781CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reliability of ultrasound grading traditional score and new global OMERACT-EULAR score system (GLOESS): results from an inter- and intra-reading exercise by rheumatologists
Authors
Lucio Ventura-Ríos
Cristina Hernández-Díaz
Diana Ferrusquia-Toríz
Esteban Cruz-Arenas
Pedro Rodríguez-Henríquez
Ana Laura Alvarez del Castillo
Alfredo Campaña-Parra
Efrén Canul
Gerardo Guerrero Yeo
Juan Jorge Mendoza-Ruiz
Mario Pérez Cristóbal
Sandra Sicsik
Karina Silva Luna
on behalf of the Grupo Mexicano de Ecografía Musculoesquelética AC (ECOMER)
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3662-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Clinical Rheumatology 12/2017 Go to the issue