Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Brief Report

A qualitative analysis of methotrexate self-injection education videos on YouTube

Authors: Rebekah Rittberg, Tharindri Dissanayake, Steven J. Katz

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate the quality of videos for patients available on YouTube for learning to self-administer subcutaneous methotrexate. Using the search term “Methotrexate injection,” two clinical reviewers analyzed the first 60 videos on YouTube. Source and search rank of video, audience interaction, video duration, and time since video was uploaded on YouTube were recorded. Videos were classified as useful, misleading, or a personal patient view. Videos were rated for reliability, comprehensiveness, and global quality scale (GQS). Reasons for misleading videos were documented, and patient videos were documented as being either positive or negative towards methotrexate (MTX) injection. Fifty-one English videos overlapped between the two geographic locations; 10 videos were classified as useful (19.6 %), 14 misleading (27.5 %), and 27 personal patient view (52.9 %). Total views of videos were 161,028: 19.2 % useful, 72.8 % patient, and 8.0 % misleading. Mean GQS: 4.2 (±1.0) useful, 1.6 (±1.1) misleading, and 2.0 (±0.9) for patient videos (p < 0.0001). Mean reliability: 3.3 (±0.6) useful, 0.9 (±1.2) misleading, and 1.0 (±0.7) for patient videos (p < 0.0001). Comprehensiveness: 2.2 (±1.9) useful, 0.1 (±0.3) misleading, and 1.5 (±1.5) for patient view videos (p = 0.0027). This study demonstrates a minority of videos are useful for teaching MTX injection. Further, video quality does not correlate with video views. While web video may be an additional educational tool available, clinicians need to be familiar with specific resources to help guide and educate their patients to ensure best outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chan ESL, Cronstein BN (2010) Methotrexate—how does it really work? Nat Rev Rheumatol 6(3):175–178CrossRefPubMed Chan ESL, Cronstein BN (2010) Methotrexate—how does it really work? Nat Rev Rheumatol 6(3):175–178CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Swierkot J, Szechiński J (2006) Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacol Rep 58(4):473–492PubMed Swierkot J, Szechiński J (2006) Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacol Rep 58(4):473–492PubMed
3.
go back to reference Freeman-Narrod M, Gerstley B, Engstrom P, Bornstein R (1975) Comparison of serum concentrations of methotrexate after various routes of administration. Cancer 36(5):1619–1624CrossRefPubMed Freeman-Narrod M, Gerstley B, Engstrom P, Bornstein R (1975) Comparison of serum concentrations of methotrexate after various routes of administration. Cancer 36(5):1619–1624CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wegrzyn J, Adeleine P, Miossec P (2004) Better efficacy of methotrexate given by intramuscular injection than orally in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 63(10):1232–1234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wegrzyn J, Adeleine P, Miossec P (2004) Better efficacy of methotrexate given by intramuscular injection than orally in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 63(10):1232–1234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Braun J, Kästner P, Flaxenberg P et al (2008) Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial. Arthritis Rheum 58(1):73–81CrossRefPubMed Braun J, Kästner P, Flaxenberg P et al (2008) Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial. Arthritis Rheum 58(1):73–81CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Feitosa ACR, Sampaio LN, Batista AGL, Pinheiro CB (2013) Frequency of fear of needles and impact of a multidisciplinary educational approach towards pregnant women with diabetes. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 35(3):111–116CrossRefPubMed Feitosa ACR, Sampaio LN, Batista AGL, Pinheiro CB (2013) Frequency of fear of needles and impact of a multidisciplinary educational approach towards pregnant women with diabetes. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 35(3):111–116CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yazici Y, Bata Y (2013) Parenteral methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71(Suppl 1):46–48 Yazici Y, Bata Y (2013) Parenteral methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71(Suppl 1):46–48
8.
go back to reference Fox S, Duggan M (2013) Health Online 2013:1–55 Fox S, Duggan M (2013) Health Online 2013:1–55
10.
go back to reference Jansen BJ, Spink A (2003) An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed. 4th Int. Conf. Internet Comput: 65–69 Jansen BJ, Spink A (2003) An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed. 4th Int. Conf. Internet Comput: 65–69
11.
go back to reference Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP (2012) YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 39(5):899–903CrossRefPubMed Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP (2012) YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 39(5):899–903CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(2):105–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(2):105–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S (2007) A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 102(9):2070–2077CrossRefPubMed Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S (2007) A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 102(9):2070–2077CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference McMullan M (2006) Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns 63(1–2):24–28CrossRefPubMed McMullan M (2006) Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns 63(1–2):24–28CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Underhill C, Mckeown L (2008) Getting a second opinion: health information and the internet. Health Rep 19(1):65–69PubMed Underhill C, Mckeown L (2008) Getting a second opinion: health information and the internet. Health Rep 19(1):65–69PubMed
16.
go back to reference Dubey D, Amritphale A, Sawhney A, Dubey D, Srivastav N (2014) Analysis of YouTube as a source of information for West Nile virus infection. Clin Med Res Dubey D, Amritphale A, Sawhney A, Dubey D, Srivastav N (2014) Analysis of YouTube as a source of information for West Nile virus infection. Clin Med Res
17.
go back to reference Chen HM, Hu ZK, Zheng XL et al (2013) Effectiveness of YouTube as a source of medical information on heart transplantation. Interact J Med Res 2(2):1–15CrossRef Chen HM, Hu ZK, Zheng XL et al (2013) Effectiveness of YouTube as a source of medical information on heart transplantation. Interact J Med Res 2(2):1–15CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fox S (2006) Online Health Search 2006: most internet users start at a search engine when looking for health information online. Very few check the source and date of the findings. Paw Internet Am Life Proj 2006:1–22 Fox S (2006) Online Health Search 2006: most internet users start at a search engine when looking for health information online. Very few check the source and date of the findings. Paw Internet Am Life Proj 2006:1–22
19.
go back to reference Katz SJ, Leung S (2014) Teaching methotrexate self-injection with a web-based video maintains patient care while reducing healthcare resources: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int. Katz SJ, Leung S (2014) Teaching methotrexate self-injection with a web-based video maintains patient care while reducing healthcare resources: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int.
Metadata
Title
A qualitative analysis of methotrexate self-injection education videos on YouTube
Authors
Rebekah Rittberg
Tharindri Dissanayake
Steven J. Katz
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2910-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Clinical Rheumatology 5/2016 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.