Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Article

Arthritis patients’ motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement

Authors: Ingrid Nota, Constance H. C. Drossaert, Erik Taal, Mart A. F. J. van de Laar

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to gain insight into arthritis patients’ motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making (MDM) and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 patients suffering from Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Many patients perceived the questions about involvement in MDM as difficult, mostly because they were unaware of having a choice. Shared decision-making (SDM) was generally preferred, but the preferred level of involvement varied between and within individuals. Preference regarding involvement may vary according to the type of treatment and the severity of the complaints. A considerable group of respondents would have liked more participation than they had experienced in the past. Perceived barriers could be divided into doctor-related (e.g. a paternalistic attitude), patient-related (e.g. lack of knowledge) and context-related (e.g. too little time to decide) factors. This study demonstrates the complexity of predicting patients’ preferences regarding involvement in MDM: most RA patients prefer SDM, but their preference may vary according to the situation they are in and the extent to which they experience barriers in getting more involved. Unawareness of having a choice is still a major barrier for patient participation. The attending physician seems to have an important role as facilitator in enhancing patient participation by raising awareness and offering options, but implementing SDM is a shared responsibility; all parties need to be involved and educated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brosseau L, Lineker S, Bell M, Wells G, Casimiro L, Egan M et al (2012) People getting a grip on arthritis: a knowledge transfer strategy to empower patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Health Educ J 71(3):255–267. doi:10.1177/0017896910387317 CrossRef Brosseau L, Lineker S, Bell M, Wells G, Casimiro L, Egan M et al (2012) People getting a grip on arthritis: a knowledge transfer strategy to empower patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Health Educ J 71(3):255–267. doi:10.​1177/​0017896910387317​ CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Neame R, Hammond A, Deighton C (2005) Need for information and for involvement in decision making among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a questionnaire survey. Arthrit Care Res 53(2):249–255CrossRef Neame R, Hammond A, Deighton C (2005) Need for information and for involvement in decision making among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a questionnaire survey. Arthrit Care Res 53(2):249–255CrossRef
4.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Légaré F, Santesso N (2004) Knowledge translation for patients: methods to support patients participation in decision making about preference sensitive treatment options in rheumatology. In: Tugwell P, Shea B, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon LS, Strand V et al (eds) Evidence-based rheumatology. BMJ Publishing Group, London O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Légaré F, Santesso N (2004) Knowledge translation for patients: methods to support patients participation in decision making about preference sensitive treatment options in rheumatology. In: Tugwell P, Shea B, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon LS, Strand V et al (eds) Evidence-based rheumatology. BMJ Publishing Group, London
7.
go back to reference Kassirer JP (1994) Incorporating patients’ preferences into medical decisions. N Engl J Med 330(26):1895–1896CrossRefPubMed Kassirer JP (1994) Incorporating patients’ preferences into medical decisions. N Engl J Med 330(26):1895–1896CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T, Kvien TK, Finset A (2006) Rheumatology care: involvement in medical decisions, received information, satisfaction with care, and unmet health care needs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Arthrit Care Res 55(3):394–401CrossRef Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T, Kvien TK, Finset A (2006) Rheumatology care: involvement in medical decisions, received information, satisfaction with care, and unmet health care needs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Arthrit Care Res 55(3):394–401CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ward MM, Sundaramurthy S, Lotstein D, Bush TM, Neuwelt CM, Street RL (2003) Participatory patient–physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthrit Care Res 49(6):810–818. doi:10.1002/art.11467 CrossRef Ward MM, Sundaramurthy S, Lotstein D, Bush TM, Neuwelt CM, Street RL (2003) Participatory patient–physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthrit Care Res 49(6):810–818. doi:10.​1002/​art.​11467 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Coulter A (1997) Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2(2):112–121PubMed Coulter A (1997) Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2(2):112–121PubMed
12.
go back to reference Schildmann J, Grunke M, Kalden JR, Vollmann J (2008) Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Med Ethics 34(11):775–779. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.023705 CrossRefPubMed Schildmann J, Grunke M, Kalden JR, Vollmann J (2008) Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Med Ethics 34(11):775–779. doi:10.​1136/​jme.​2007.​023705 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Urowitz S, Sharpe N (2007) Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expect 10(3):248–258CrossRefPubMed Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Urowitz S, Sharpe N (2007) Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expect 10(3):248–258CrossRefPubMed
15.
17.
go back to reference Funk LM (2004) Who wants to be involved? Decision-making preferences among residents of long-term care facilities. Can J Aging 23(1):47–58CrossRefPubMed Funk LM (2004) Who wants to be involved? Decision-making preferences among residents of long-term care facilities. Can J Aging 23(1):47–58CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG (2004) Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 22(15):3091–3098. doi:10.1200/jco.2004.09.069 CrossRefPubMed Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG (2004) Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 22(15):3091–3098. doi:10.​1200/​jco.​2004.​09.​069 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Murray E, Pollack L, White M, Lo B (2006) Clinical decision-making: patients’ preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):189–196CrossRefPubMed Murray E, Pollack L, White M, Lo B (2006) Clinical decision-making: patients’ preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):189–196CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MCM, Marijnen CAM, Stiggelbout AM (2008) Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. Br J Cancer 99(6):875–882CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MCM, Marijnen CAM, Stiggelbout AM (2008) Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. Br J Cancer 99(6):875–882CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Vogel BA, Bengel J, Helmes AW (2008) Information and decision making: patients’ needs and experiences in the course of breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns 71(1):79–85CrossRefPubMed Vogel BA, Bengel J, Helmes AW (2008) Information and decision making: patients’ needs and experiences in the course of breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns 71(1):79–85CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A (2014) Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 94(3):291–309. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031 CrossRefPubMed Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A (2014) Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 94(3):291–309. doi:10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2013.​10.​031 CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Vogel BA, Helmes AW, Hasenburg A (2008) Concordance between patients’ desired and actual decision-making roles in breast cancer care. Psycho-Oncology 17(2):182–189CrossRefPubMed Vogel BA, Helmes AW, Hasenburg A (2008) Concordance between patients’ desired and actual decision-making roles in breast cancer care. Psycho-Oncology 17(2):182–189CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Joosten EAG, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CPF, de Jong CAJ (2008) Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 77(4):219–226CrossRefPubMed Joosten EAG, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CPF, de Jong CAJ (2008) Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 77(4):219–226CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Garfield S, Smith F, Francis SA, Chalmers C (2007) Can patients’ preferences for involvement in decision-making regarding the use of medicines be predicted? Patient Educ Couns 66(3):361–367CrossRefPubMed Garfield S, Smith F, Francis SA, Chalmers C (2007) Can patients’ preferences for involvement in decision-making regarding the use of medicines be predicted? Patient Educ Couns 66(3):361–367CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Patton M (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. Patton M (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
34.
go back to reference Sainio C, Lauri S, Eriksson E (2001) Cancer patients’ views and experiences of participation in care and decision making. Nurs Ethics 8(2):X-113 Sainio C, Lauri S, Eriksson E (2001) Cancer patients’ views and experiences of participation in care and decision making. Nurs Ethics 8(2):X-113
35.
go back to reference Henderson S (2002) Influences on patient participation and decision-making in care. Professional Nurse (Lond Engl) 17(9):521–525 Henderson S (2002) Influences on patient participation and decision-making in care. Professional Nurse (Lond Engl) 17(9):521–525
36.
go back to reference Belcher VN, Fried TR, Agostini JV, Tinetti ME (2006) Views of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making. J Gen Intern Med 21(4):298–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Belcher VN, Fried TR, Agostini JV, Tinetti ME (2006) Views of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making. J Gen Intern Med 21(4):298–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Entwistle V, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis JJ (2008) Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation. Soc Sci Med 66(2):362–375CrossRefPubMed Entwistle V, Prior M, Skea ZC, Francis JJ (2008) Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation. Soc Sci Med 66(2):362–375CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O’Donnell MT (2001) Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med 53(6):721–732CrossRefPubMed Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O’Donnell MT (2001) Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med 53(6):721–732CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Degner LF, Sloan JA (1992) Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45(9):941–950CrossRefPubMed Degner LF, Sloan JA (1992) Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45(9):941–950CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Arora NK, McHorney CA (2000) Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care 38(3):335–341CrossRefPubMed Arora NK, McHorney CA (2000) Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care 38(3):335–341CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz M (1989) Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy. J Gen Intern Med 4(1):23–30CrossRefPubMed Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz M (1989) Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy. J Gen Intern Med 4(1):23–30CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Beisecker AE, Beisecker TD (1990) Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care 28(1):19–28CrossRefPubMed Beisecker AE, Beisecker TD (1990) Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care 28(1):19–28CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44(5):681–692CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44(5):681–692CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Bhavnani V, Fisher B (2010) Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study. Health Expect 13(1):45–54CrossRefPubMed Bhavnani V, Fisher B (2010) Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study. Health Expect 13(1):45–54CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB (2004) How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision‐making? Health Expect 7(4):317–326CrossRefPubMed Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB (2004) How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision‐making? Health Expect 7(4):317–326CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Berrios-rivera JP, Street RL, Garcia Popa-lisseanu MG, Kallen MA, Richardson MN, Janssen NM et al (2006) Trust in physicians and elements of the medical interaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthrit Care Res 55(3):385–393. doi:10.1002/art.21988 CrossRef Berrios-rivera JP, Street RL, Garcia Popa-lisseanu MG, Kallen MA, Richardson MN, Janssen NM et al (2006) Trust in physicians and elements of the medical interaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthrit Care Res 55(3):385–393. doi:10.​1002/​art.​21988 CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Keating NL, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Bates DW, Ayanian JZ (2004) Patient characteristics and experiences associated with trust in specialist physicians. Arch Intern Med 164(9):1015CrossRefPubMed Keating NL, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Bates DW, Ayanian JZ (2004) Patient characteristics and experiences associated with trust in specialist physicians. Arch Intern Med 164(9):1015CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Tariman J, Berry D, Cochrane B, Doorenbos A, Schepp K (2010) Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 21(6):1145–1151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tariman J, Berry D, Cochrane B, Doorenbos A, Schepp K (2010) Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 21(6):1145–1151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Salt E, Peden A (2011) The complexity of the treatment: the decision-making process among women with rheumatoid arthritis. Qual Health Res 21(2):214–222CrossRefPubMed Salt E, Peden A (2011) The complexity of the treatment: the decision-making process among women with rheumatoid arthritis. Qual Health Res 21(2):214–222CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Koerner M, Wirtz M, Michaelis M, Ehrhardt H, Steger A-K, Zerpies E et al (2014) A multicentre cluster-randomized controlled study to evaluate a train-the-trainer programme for implementing internal and external participation in medical rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 28(1):20–35. doi:10.1177/0269215513494874 CrossRefPubMed Koerner M, Wirtz M, Michaelis M, Ehrhardt H, Steger A-K, Zerpies E et al (2014) A multicentre cluster-randomized controlled study to evaluate a train-the-trainer programme for implementing internal and external participation in medical rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 28(1):20–35. doi:10.​1177/​0269215513494874​ CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB et al (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Status and date: Edited (no change to conclusions), published in. (1) Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB et al (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Status and date: Edited (no change to conclusions), published in. (1)
60.
go back to reference Ministerie van Volksgezondheid We S (2011) Landelijke nota gezondheidsbeleid: Gezondheid dichtbij. In: Ministerie van Volksgezondheid WeS, editor. Den Haag Ministerie van Volksgezondheid We S (2011) Landelijke nota gezondheidsbeleid: Gezondheid dichtbij. In: Ministerie van Volksgezondheid WeS, editor. Den Haag
Metadata
Title
Arthritis patients’ motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement
Authors
Ingrid Nota
Constance H. C. Drossaert
Erik Taal
Mart A. F. J. van de Laar
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2820-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Clinical Rheumatology 5/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.