Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Review Article

PROMs in inflammatory arthritis: moving from static to dynamic

Author: Yasser El Miedany

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

There are several advantages in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in standard clinical practice, particularly if a questionnaire is distributed to each patient at each visit as a standard in the infrastructure usual care. The patients, being the most knowledgeable persons concerning their pain and global estimate, do most of the work by completing a questionnaire. Completion of the questionnaire helps the patients prepare for their visit as well as improving doctor–patient communication. Recently, the role of PROMs has expanded from the static phase of capturing and measuring outcomes at a single point of time to a more dynamic role. This dynamic role is aiming at driving improvement not only in the quality of inflammatory arthritis care but also in the patients' reported experience. Therefore, in addition to its value in tailoring treatment targets adapted to the patient's needs, PROMs also have the potential of modifying the disease impact through improving the patients' adherence to therapy and allowing the patients to monitor the changes in their condition. Though more attention has been given to the use of PROMs in routine clinical care, little was published regarding what could be done with the plethora of data gained from PROMs and how dynamic it can be enhancing the “patient-centered care” approach and improving patients' experience. This article highlights the value of adopting PROMs for arthritic patients in standard clinical practice and its impact on long-term patients' management.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Pincus T, Yazici Y, Sokka T (2007) Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21:601–628PubMedCrossRef Pincus T, Yazici Y, Sokka T (2007) Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21:601–628PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S et al (2003) Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 30:868–872PubMed Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S et al (2003) Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 30:868–872PubMed
4.
go back to reference Aletaha D, Machold KP, Nell VPK, Smolen JS (2006) The perception of rheumatoid arthritis core set measures by rheumatologists. Results of a survey. Rheumatol (Oxford) 45:1133–1139CrossRef Aletaha D, Machold KP, Nell VPK, Smolen JS (2006) The perception of rheumatoid arthritis core set measures by rheumatologists. Results of a survey. Rheumatol (Oxford) 45:1133–1139CrossRef
5.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef SS, Palmer D (2010) Incorporating patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice: development and validation of a questionnaire for inflammatory arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 28(5):734–744PubMed El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef SS, Palmer D (2010) Incorporating patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice: development and validation of a questionnaire for inflammatory arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 28(5):734–744PubMed
6.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Patrick DL (1989) Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Med Care 27:S254–S268PubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Patrick DL (1989) Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Med Care 27:S254–S268PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fung C, Hays RD (2008) Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 17:1297–1302PubMedCrossRef Fung C, Hays RD (2008) Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 17:1297–1302PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Valderas JM, Alonso J, Guyatt GH (2008) Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving from clinical trials into clinical practice. Med J Aust 189(2):93–94PubMed Valderas JM, Alonso J, Guyatt GH (2008) Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving from clinical trials into clinical practice. Med J Aust 189(2):93–94PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lohr KN, Zebrack BJ (2009) Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res 18:99–107PubMedCrossRef Lohr KN, Zebrack BJ (2009) Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res 18:99–107PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Palmer D, El Gaafary M, El MY (2007) Improving patient care: measurement of outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Nurs 16:1010–1015PubMed Palmer D, El Gaafary M, El MY (2007) Improving patient care: measurement of outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Nurs 16:1010–1015PubMed
11.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, Youssef S, Mehanna AN, El GM (2008) Development of a scoring system for assessment of outcome of early undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis. Joint Bone Spine 75(2):155–162PubMedCrossRef El Miedany Y, Youssef S, Mehanna AN, El GM (2008) Development of a scoring system for assessment of outcome of early undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis. Joint Bone Spine 75(2):155–162PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pincus T, Callahan LF, Sale WG, Brooks AL, Payne LE, Vaughn WK (1984) Severe functional declines, work disability, and increased mortality in seventy-five rheumatoid arthritis patients studied over nine years. Arthritis Rheum 27(8):864–872PubMedCrossRef Pincus T, Callahan LF, Sale WG, Brooks AL, Payne LE, Vaughn WK (1984) Severe functional declines, work disability, and increased mortality in seventy-five rheumatoid arthritis patients studied over nine years. Arthritis Rheum 27(8):864–872PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Singh J, Furst D, Bharatacr A et al (2012) Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology Recommendations for the Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Biologic Agents in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64(5):625–639CrossRef Singh J, Furst D, Bharatacr A et al (2012) Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology Recommendations for the Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Biologic Agents in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64(5):625–639CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van De Putte LB, van Riel PL (1995) Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:44–48PubMedCrossRef Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van De Putte LB, van Riel PL (1995) Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:44–48PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Aletaha D, Smolen J (2005) The simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(suppl 39):S100–S108PubMed Aletaha D, Smolen J (2005) The simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(suppl 39):S100–S108PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hewlett S (2003) Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol 30:877–879PubMed Hewlett S (2003) Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol 30:877–879PubMed
17.
go back to reference Hewlett S, Carr M, Ryan S, Kirwan J, Richards P, Carr A et al (2005) Outcomes generated by patients with rheumatoid arthritis: how important are they? Musculoskeletal Care 3:131–142PubMedCrossRef Hewlett S, Carr M, Ryan S, Kirwan J, Richards P, Carr A et al (2005) Outcomes generated by patients with rheumatoid arthritis: how important are they? Musculoskeletal Care 3:131–142PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sanderson T, Kirwan J (2009) Patient-reported outcomes for arthritis: time to focus on personal life impact measures? Arthritis Care & Res 61(1):1–3CrossRef Sanderson T, Kirwan J (2009) Patient-reported outcomes for arthritis: time to focus on personal life impact measures? Arthritis Care & Res 61(1):1–3CrossRef
19.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, Palmer D, El Gaafary M (2009) Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: patient self-reported joint tenderness is reliable and responsive to change in disease activity. Rheumatol (Oxford) 48(Suppl 1):i141 El Miedany Y, Palmer D, El Gaafary M (2009) Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: patient self-reported joint tenderness is reliable and responsive to change in disease activity. Rheumatol (Oxford) 48(Suppl 1):i141
20.
go back to reference Michaud K, Wolfe F (2007) Comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21(5):885–906PubMedCrossRef Michaud K, Wolfe F (2007) Comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21(5):885–906PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Palmer D (2009) Answering the difficult question: how to identify rheumatoid arthritis patients at higher risk of cardiovascular disease in the standard practice? Ann Rheum Dis 68(SIII):554 El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Palmer D (2009) Answering the difficult question: how to identify rheumatoid arthritis patients at higher risk of cardiovascular disease in the standard practice? Ann Rheum Dis 68(SIII):554
22.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Palmer D (2012) Assessment of the utility of visual feedback in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis patients: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int 32(10):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Palmer D (2012) Assessment of the utility of visual feedback in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis patients: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int 32(10):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A et al (2004) Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:263–269PubMedCrossRef Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A et al (2004) Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:263–269PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Verstappen SMM, Jacobs JWG, van der Veen MJ et al (2007) Intensive treatment with methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: aiming for remission. Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA, an open-label strategy trial). Ann Rheum Dis 66:1443–1449PubMedCrossRef Verstappen SMM, Jacobs JWG, van der Veen MJ et al (2007) Intensive treatment with methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: aiming for remission. Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA, an open-label strategy trial). Ann Rheum Dis 66:1443–1449PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Soubrier M, Lukas C, Sibilia J et al (2011) Disease activity score-driven therapy versus routine care in patients with recent-onset active rheumatoid arthritis: data from the GUEPARD trial and ESPOIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 70:611–615PubMedCrossRef Soubrier M, Lukas C, Sibilia J et al (2011) Disease activity score-driven therapy versus routine care in patients with recent-onset active rheumatoid arthritis: data from the GUEPARD trial and ESPOIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 70:611–615PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Möttönen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalorepo M et al (1999) Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FINRACo trial group. Lancet 353:1568–1573PubMedCrossRef Möttönen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalorepo M et al (1999) Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FINRACo trial group. Lancet 353:1568–1573PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Puolakka K, Kautiainen H, Möttönen T et al (2005) Early suppression of disease activity is essential for maintenance of work capacity in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: five-year experience from the FIN-RACo trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:36–41PubMedCrossRef Puolakka K, Kautiainen H, Möttönen T et al (2005) Early suppression of disease activity is essential for maintenance of work capacity in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: five-year experience from the FIN-RACo trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:36–41PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hetland ML, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Junker P et al (2008) Aggressive combination therapy with intra-articular glucocorticoid injections and conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in early rheumatoid arthritis: second-year clinical and radiographic results from the CIMESTRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 67:815–822PubMedCrossRef Hetland ML, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Junker P et al (2008) Aggressive combination therapy with intra-articular glucocorticoid injections and conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in early rheumatoid arthritis: second-year clinical and radiographic results from the CIMESTRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 67:815–822PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hetland ML, Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg B et al (2012) Short- and long-term efficacy of intra-articular injections with betamethasone as part of a treat-to-target strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: impact of joint area, repeated injections, MRI findings, anti-CCP, IgM-RF and CRP. Ann Rheum Dis 71:851–856PubMedCrossRef Hetland ML, Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg B et al (2012) Short- and long-term efficacy of intra-articular injections with betamethasone as part of a treat-to-target strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: impact of joint area, repeated injections, MRI findings, anti-CCP, IgM-RF and CRP. Ann Rheum Dis 71:851–856PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, de Vriesbouwstra JK, Allaart CF et al (2007) Comparison of treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146:406–415PubMedCrossRef Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, de Vriesbouwstra JK, Allaart CF et al (2007) Comparison of treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146:406–415PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, de Vriesbouwstra JK, Allaart CF et al (2005) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:3381–3390PubMedCrossRef Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, de Vriesbouwstra JK, Allaart CF et al (2005) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:3381–3390PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, De Vries-Bouwstra JK, Kerstens PJ et al (2010) DAS-driven therapy versus routine care in patients with recent-onset active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 69:65–69PubMedCrossRef Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, De Vries-Bouwstra JK, Kerstens PJ et al (2010) DAS-driven therapy versus routine care in patients with recent-onset active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 69:65–69PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schipper LG, Vermeer M, Kuper HH et al (2012) A tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is more effective than usual care treatment in daily clinical practice: a study of two cohorts in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry. Ann Rheum Dis 71:845–850PubMedCrossRef Schipper LG, Vermeer M, Kuper HH et al (2012) A tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is more effective than usual care treatment in daily clinical practice: a study of two cohorts in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry. Ann Rheum Dis 71:845–850PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Castrejón I, Pincus T (2012) Patient self-report outcomes to guide a treat-to-target strategy in clinical trials and usual clinical care of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30(suppl 73):S50–S55PubMed Castrejón I, Pincus T (2012) Patient self-report outcomes to guide a treat-to-target strategy in clinical trials and usual clinical care of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30(suppl 73):S50–S55PubMed
35.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Palmer D (2011) US as an outcome measure in the management of inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. Arthritis Rheum 63(10):S319 El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Palmer D (2011) US as an outcome measure in the management of inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. Arthritis Rheum 63(10):S319
36.
go back to reference Rimer B, Jones WL, Keintz MK, Catalono RB, Engstrom PF (1984) Informed consent: a crucial step in cancer patient education. Health Educ Q 10(suppl):30–42PubMed Rimer B, Jones WL, Keintz MK, Catalono RB, Engstrom PF (1984) Informed consent: a crucial step in cancer patient education. Health Educ Q 10(suppl):30–42PubMed
37.
go back to reference Heneghan K, Sachdeva A, McAninch J (2009) Transformation to a system that supports full patient participation. Bul Am Coll Surg 91(6):12–20 Heneghan K, Sachdeva A, McAninch J (2009) Transformation to a system that supports full patient participation. Bul Am Coll Surg 91(6):12–20
38.
go back to reference Hardware B, Lacey E, Shewan J (2004) Towards the development of a tool to assess educational needs in patients with arthritis. Clin Eff Nurs 8:111–117CrossRef Hardware B, Lacey E, Shewan J (2004) Towards the development of a tool to assess educational needs in patients with arthritis. Clin Eff Nurs 8:111–117CrossRef
39.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2012) The management of rheumatoid arthritis in adults. Clinical guideline 79. http://tiny.cc/lbah0 (accessed 14 November 2012) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2012) The management of rheumatoid arthritis in adults. Clinical guideline 79. http://​tiny.​cc/​lbah0 (accessed 14 November 2012)
40.
go back to reference Smolen J, Landewé R, Breedveld F et al (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. doi:10.1136/ard.2009.126532 Smolen J, Landewé R, Breedveld F et al (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. doi:10.​1136/​ard.​2009.​126532
41.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, El Arousy N, Ahmed I, Youssef S, Palmer D (2012) Arthritis education: the integration of patient-reported outcome measures and patient self-management. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30(6):899–904 El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, El Arousy N, Ahmed I, Youssef S, Palmer D (2012) Arthritis education: the integration of patient-reported outcome measures and patient self-management. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30(6):899–904
42.
go back to reference Palmer D, El Miedany Y (2012) PROMs: a novel approach to arthritis self-management. Br J Nurs 13; 21(10):601–605 Palmer D, El Miedany Y (2012) PROMs: a novel approach to arthritis self-management. Br J Nurs 13; 21(10):601–605
43.
go back to reference American College of Physicians (2008) Information on cost-effectiveness: an essential product of a national comparative effectiveness program. Ann Intern Med 148:956–961CrossRef American College of Physicians (2008) Information on cost-effectiveness: an essential product of a national comparative effectiveness program. Ann Intern Med 148:956–961CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Rawlins MD, Culyer AJ (2004) National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. Br Med J 329:224–227CrossRef Rawlins MD, Culyer AJ (2004) National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. Br Med J 329:224–227CrossRef
46.
go back to reference El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Palmer D (2011) Patient reported outcome measures: its impact on disease activity and adherence to therapy in inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 63(S10):1753 El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Palmer D (2011) Patient reported outcome measures: its impact on disease activity and adherence to therapy in inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 63(S10):1753
48.
go back to reference Whelan P, Reddy L, Andrews T (2011) Patient satisfaction rating scales v. patient-related outcome and experience measures. Psychiatrist 35:32–33CrossRef Whelan P, Reddy L, Andrews T (2011) Patient satisfaction rating scales v. patient-related outcome and experience measures. Psychiatrist 35:32–33CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SB, Hadden S, Burns A (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br J Psychiatry 172:11–18PubMedCrossRef Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SB, Hadden S, Burns A (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br J Psychiatry 172:11–18PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
PROMs in inflammatory arthritis: moving from static to dynamic
Author
Yasser El Miedany
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2228-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Clinical Rheumatology 6/2013 Go to the issue