Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Original Article

Can bone quality be predicted accurately by Singh index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors: Cemal Bes, Melih Güven, Budak Akman, Evren Fehmi Atay, Emrah Ceviz, Mehmet Soy

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate Singh index as a simple and inexpensive means of estimation of bone quality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Singh index evaluation was made on digital pelvis radiographs in 50 consecutive patients by three observers. Bone mineral density T scores of the spine and left proximal femur were assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Singh index was correlated with densitometry measurements after grouping the patients as normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis. Intra- and interobserver agreements were evaluated by kappa correlations. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratio’s of Singh index were calculated. Both intra- and interobserver agreements were 0.71 (range, 0.69 to 0.72) on average. Singh index proved highly sensitive for the diagnosis of osteopenia at the proximal femur (91%) and spine (90%), whereas the specificity of Singh index for identifying of osteoporosis at the femoral neck (93%) and spine (91%) was higher than sensitivity. Predictive values for osteoporosis at the proximal femur and spine were acceptable and positive likelihood ratios of Singh index for osteopenia and osteoporosis at the proximal femur were 2.4 and 10.1, respectively. Singh index can identify osteoporosis with a high specificity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, the patients who are graded as osteopenia by the Singh index should undergo further evaluation with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deodhar AA, Woolf AD (1996) Bone mass measurement and bone metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis: a review. Br J Rheumatol 35(4):309–322PubMedCrossRef Deodhar AA, Woolf AD (1996) Bone mass measurement and bone metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis: a review. Br J Rheumatol 35(4):309–322PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK (2000) Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 394 patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis register. Arthritis Rheum 43(3):522–530PubMedCrossRef Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK (2000) Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 394 patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis register. Arthritis Rheum 43(3):522–530PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference van Schaardenburg D, Valkema R, Dijkmans BA, Papapoulos S, Zwinderman AH, Han KH et al (1995) Prednisone treatment of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Disease activity and bone mass in comparison with chloroquine treatment. Arthritis Rheum 38(3):334–342PubMedCrossRef van Schaardenburg D, Valkema R, Dijkmans BA, Papapoulos S, Zwinderman AH, Han KH et al (1995) Prednisone treatment of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Disease activity and bone mass in comparison with chloroquine treatment. Arthritis Rheum 38(3):334–342PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Levis S, Altman R (1998) Bone densitometry: clinical considerations. Arthritis Rheum 41(4):577–587PubMedCrossRef Levis S, Altman R (1998) Bone densitometry: clinical considerations. Arthritis Rheum 41(4):577–587PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fiter J, Nolla JM, Gomez-Vaquero C, Martinez-Aquila D, Valverde J, Roig-Escofet D (2001) A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12(7):565–569PubMedCrossRef Fiter J, Nolla JM, Gomez-Vaquero C, Martinez-Aquila D, Valverde J, Roig-Escofet D (2001) A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12(7):565–569PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, Reid I, Ehrlich G, Kanis J et al (1999) Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization task-force for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10(4):259–264PubMedCrossRef Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, Reid I, Ehrlich G, Kanis J et al (1999) Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization task-force for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10(4):259–264PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129 World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129
8.
go back to reference Salaffi F, Silveri F, Stancati A, Grassi W (2005) Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Clin Rheumatol 24(3):203–211PubMedCrossRef Salaffi F, Silveri F, Stancati A, Grassi W (2005) Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Clin Rheumatol 24(3):203–211PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Boehm HF, Link TM (2004) Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2(2):41–46PubMedCrossRef Boehm HF, Link TM (2004) Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2(2):41–46PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Krischak GD, Augat P, Wachter NJ, Kinzl L, Claes LE (1999) Predictive value of bone mineral density and Singh index for the in vitro mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the femoral head. Clin Biomech 14(5):346–351CrossRef Krischak GD, Augat P, Wachter NJ, Kinzl L, Claes LE (1999) Predictive value of bone mineral density and Singh index for the in vitro mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the femoral head. Clin Biomech 14(5):346–351CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 52(3):457–467 Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 52(3):457–467
12.
go back to reference Koot VC, Kesselaer SM, Clevers GJ, de Hooge P, Weits T, van der Werken C (1996) Evaluation of the Singh index for measuring osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78(5):831–834 Koot VC, Kesselaer SM, Clevers GJ, de Hooge P, Weits T, van der Werken C (1996) Evaluation of the Singh index for measuring osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78(5):831–834
13.
go back to reference Kawashima T, Uhthoff HK (1991) Pattern of bone loss of the proximal femur: a radiologic, densitometric and histomorphometric study. J Orthop Res 9(5):634–640PubMedCrossRef Kawashima T, Uhthoff HK (1991) Pattern of bone loss of the proximal femur: a radiologic, densitometric and histomorphometric study. J Orthop Res 9(5):634–640PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Matthews S, Pearcy MJ, Fazzalari NL, Parkinson IH, Manthey BA, Schultz CG, Howie DW (1992) Correlations between the mechanical properties, radiology and histomorphometry of human femoral bone. Clin Biomech 7(3):153–160CrossRef Matthews S, Pearcy MJ, Fazzalari NL, Parkinson IH, Manthey BA, Schultz CG, Howie DW (1992) Correlations between the mechanical properties, radiology and histomorphometry of human femoral bone. Clin Biomech 7(3):153–160CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wachter NJ, Augat P, Hoellen IP, Krischak GD, Sarkar MR, Mentzel M et al (2001) Predictive value of Singh index and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography in determining the local cancellous bone quality of the proximal femur. Clin Biomech 16(3):257–262CrossRef Wachter NJ, Augat P, Hoellen IP, Krischak GD, Sarkar MR, Mentzel M et al (2001) Predictive value of Singh index and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography in determining the local cancellous bone quality of the proximal femur. Clin Biomech 16(3):257–262CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cooper C, Barker DJ, Hall AJ (1986) Evaluation of the Singh index and femoral calcar width as epidemiological methods for measuring bone mass in the femoral neck. Clin Radiol 37(2):123–125PubMedCrossRef Cooper C, Barker DJ, Hall AJ (1986) Evaluation of the Singh index and femoral calcar width as epidemiological methods for measuring bone mass in the femoral neck. Clin Radiol 37(2):123–125PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kuehn BM (2005) Better osteoporosis management a priority: impact predicted to soar with aging population. J Am Med Assoc 293(20):2453–2458CrossRef Kuehn BM (2005) Better osteoporosis management a priority: impact predicted to soar with aging population. J Am Med Assoc 293(20):2453–2458CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Masud T, Jawed S, Doyle DV, Spector TD (1995) A population study of the screening potential of assessment of trabecular pattern of the femoral neck (Singh index): the Chingford Study. Br J Radiol 68(808):389–393PubMedCrossRef Masud T, Jawed S, Doyle DV, Spector TD (1995) A population study of the screening potential of assessment of trabecular pattern of the femoral neck (Singh index): the Chingford Study. Br J Radiol 68(808):389–393PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hauschild O, Ghanem N, Oberst M, Baumann T, Kreuz PC, Langer M et al (2009) Evaluation of Singh index for assessment of osteoporosis using digital radiography. Eur J Radiol 71(1):152–158PubMedCrossRef Hauschild O, Ghanem N, Oberst M, Baumann T, Kreuz PC, Langer M et al (2009) Evaluation of Singh index for assessment of osteoporosis using digital radiography. Eur J Radiol 71(1):152–158PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sah AP, Thornhill TS, Leboff MS, Glowacki J (2007) Correlation of plain radiographic indices of the hip with quantitative bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1119–1126PubMedCrossRef Sah AP, Thornhill TS, Leboff MS, Glowacki J (2007) Correlation of plain radiographic indices of the hip with quantitative bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1119–1126PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Patel SH, Murphy KP (2006) Fractures of the proximal femur: correlates of radiological evidence of osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol 35(4):202–211PubMedCrossRef Patel SH, Murphy KP (2006) Fractures of the proximal femur: correlates of radiological evidence of osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol 35(4):202–211PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Watts NB (2004) Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int 15(11):847–854PubMedCrossRef Watts NB (2004) Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int 15(11):847–854PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Can bone quality be predicted accurately by Singh index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
Authors
Cemal Bes
Melih Güven
Budak Akman
Evren Fehmi Atay
Emrah Ceviz
Mehmet Soy
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1786-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Clinical Rheumatology 1/2012 Go to the issue