Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Original Article

Anti-CCP antibodies have more diagnostic impact than rheumatoid factor (RF) in a population tested for RF

Authors: I. G. Silveira, R. W. Burlingame, C. A. von Mühlen, A. L. Bender, H. L. Staub

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic powers of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) in a population selected for its high statistical relevance, over a 6-month period, an informed consent to test for anti-CCP was obtained from 1,025 consecutive patients for whom RF was ordered at a University laboratory. Within 1 year, a diagnosis was obtained without informing the physician about the anti-CCP result. Extensive statistical analyses were performed. A total of 768 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 132 were classified as having RA, yielding a pre-test probability of RA of 17%. The sensitivities for anti-CCP and RF were 62 and 64% (P = 0.83), and the specificities were 97 and 90% (P < 0.001), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 79% for anti-CCP and 56% for RF (P < 0.001), whereas the negative predictive value was 92% for both. The likelihood ratio (LR) was 17.9 for anti-CCP and 6.2 for RF (P < 0.005). Forty RA patients were diagnosed with RA of less than 2 years length, and the same significant statistic differences between anti-CCP and RF were observed. Placing the results of both tests together, or using different cutoff points, increased the diagnostic utility of the tests. The anti-CCP test has statistically shown significant higher specificity, PPV, and LR for RA than the RF test in a clinically diverse population. If new criteria are to be devised to help diagnose early RA, anti-CCP should be included because it has a greater diagnostic impact than RF.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Van der Heijde D (1995) Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 34:74–78PubMed Van der Heijde D (1995) Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 34:74–78PubMed
2.
go back to reference O’Dell JR (2002) Treating rheumatoid arthritis early: a window of opportunity? Arthritis Rheum 46:283–285PubMedCrossRef O’Dell JR (2002) Treating rheumatoid arthritis early: a window of opportunity? Arthritis Rheum 46:283–285PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324PubMedCrossRef Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg B, Szkudlarek M (2005) Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: roles of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, conventional radiography and computed tomography. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:91–116PubMedCrossRef Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg B, Szkudlarek M (2005) Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: roles of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, conventional radiography and computed tomography. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:91–116PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schumacher HR, Pessler F, Chen LX (2003) Diagnosing early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). What are the problems and opportunities? Clin Exp Rheumatol 21(5 Suppl 31):S15–S19PubMed Schumacher HR, Pessler F, Chen LX (2003) Diagnosing early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). What are the problems and opportunities? Clin Exp Rheumatol 21(5 Suppl 31):S15–S19PubMed
6.
go back to reference Goldbach-Mansky R, Lee J, McCoy A et al (2000) Rheumatoid arthritis associated autoantibodies in patients with synovitis of recent onset. Arthritis Res 2(3):236–243PubMedCrossRef Goldbach-Mansky R, Lee J, McCoy A et al (2000) Rheumatoid arthritis associated autoantibodies in patients with synovitis of recent onset. Arthritis Res 2(3):236–243PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schellekens GA, de Jong BA, van den Hoogen FH et al (1998) Citrulline is an essential constituent of antigenic determinants recognized by rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J Clin Invest 101(1):273–281PubMed Schellekens GA, de Jong BA, van den Hoogen FH et al (1998) Citrulline is an essential constituent of antigenic determinants recognized by rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J Clin Invest 101(1):273–281PubMed
8.
go back to reference Nienhuis RL, Mandema E (1964) A new serum factor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; the antiperinuclear factor. Ann Rheum Dis 23:302–305PubMed Nienhuis RL, Mandema E (1964) A new serum factor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; the antiperinuclear factor. Ann Rheum Dis 23:302–305PubMed
9.
go back to reference Young BJ, Mallya RK, Leslie RD et al (1979) Anti-keratin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 2(6182):97–99PubMedCrossRef Young BJ, Mallya RK, Leslie RD et al (1979) Anti-keratin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 2(6182):97–99PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Silveira IG, Keiserman MW, vonMühlen CA (2000) Clinical and laboratorial study of antiperinuclear factor in rheumatoid arthritis. Rev Bras Reumatol 40:159–167 Silveira IG, Keiserman MW, vonMühlen CA (2000) Clinical and laboratorial study of antiperinuclear factor in rheumatoid arthritis. Rev Bras Reumatol 40:159–167
11.
go back to reference Sebbag M, Simon M, Vincent C et al (1995) The antiperinuclear factor and the so-called antikeratin antibodies are the same rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J Clin Invest 95(6):2672–2679PubMed Sebbag M, Simon M, Vincent C et al (1995) The antiperinuclear factor and the so-called antikeratin antibodies are the same rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J Clin Invest 95(6):2672–2679PubMed
12.
go back to reference Simon M, Girbal E, Sebbag M et al (1993) The cytokeratin filament-aggregating protein filaggrin is the target of the so-called “antikeratin antibodies,” autoantibodies specific for rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest 92(3):1387–1393PubMed Simon M, Girbal E, Sebbag M et al (1993) The cytokeratin filament-aggregating protein filaggrin is the target of the so-called “antikeratin antibodies,” autoantibodies specific for rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest 92(3):1387–1393PubMed
13.
go back to reference Girbal-Neuhauser E, Durieux JJ, Arnaud M et al (1999) The epitopes targeted by the rheumatoid arthritis-associated antifilaggrin autoantibodies are posttranslationally generated on various sites of (pro)filaggrin by deimination of arginine residues. J Immunol 162(1):585–594PubMed Girbal-Neuhauser E, Durieux JJ, Arnaud M et al (1999) The epitopes targeted by the rheumatoid arthritis-associated antifilaggrin autoantibodies are posttranslationally generated on various sites of (pro)filaggrin by deimination of arginine residues. J Immunol 162(1):585–594PubMed
14.
go back to reference Union A, Meheus L, Humbel RL et al (2002) Identification of citrullinated rheumatoid arthritis-specific epitopes in natural filaggrin relevant for antifilaggrin autoantibody detection by line immunoassay. Arthritis Rheum 46(5):1185–1195PubMedCrossRef Union A, Meheus L, Humbel RL et al (2002) Identification of citrullinated rheumatoid arthritis-specific epitopes in natural filaggrin relevant for antifilaggrin autoantibody detection by line immunoassay. Arthritis Rheum 46(5):1185–1195PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Serre G (2001) Autoantibodies to filaggrin/deiminated fibrin (AFA) are useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis, and are probably involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. Joint Bone Spine 68(2):103–105PubMedCrossRef Serre G (2001) Autoantibodies to filaggrin/deiminated fibrin (AFA) are useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis, and are probably involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. Joint Bone Spine 68(2):103–105PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dubucquoi S, Solau-Gervais E, Lefranc D et al (2004) Evaluation of anti-citrullinated filaggrin antibodies as hallmarks for the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 63(4):415–419PubMedCrossRef Dubucquoi S, Solau-Gervais E, Lefranc D et al (2004) Evaluation of anti-citrullinated filaggrin antibodies as hallmarks for the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 63(4):415–419PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Grootenboer-Mignot S, Nicaise-Roland P, Delaunay C et al (2004) Second generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2) antibodies can replace other anti-filaggrin antibodies and improve rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis. Scand J Rheumatol 33(4):218–220PubMedCrossRef Grootenboer-Mignot S, Nicaise-Roland P, Delaunay C et al (2004) Second generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2) antibodies can replace other anti-filaggrin antibodies and improve rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis. Scand J Rheumatol 33(4):218–220PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference De Rycke L, Peene I, Hoffman IE et al (2004) Rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic value, associations with radiological progression rate, and extra-articular manifestations. Ann Rheum Dis 63(12):1587–1593PubMedCrossRef De Rycke L, Peene I, Hoffman IE et al (2004) Rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic value, associations with radiological progression rate, and extra-articular manifestations. Ann Rheum Dis 63(12):1587–1593PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schellekens GA, Visser H, de Jong BA et al (2000) The diagnostic properties of rheumatoid arthritis antibodies recognizing a cyclic citrullinated peptide. Arthritis Rheum 43(1):155–163PubMedCrossRef Schellekens GA, Visser H, de Jong BA et al (2000) The diagnostic properties of rheumatoid arthritis antibodies recognizing a cyclic citrullinated peptide. Arthritis Rheum 43(1):155–163PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bas S, Perneger TV, Seitz M et al (2002) Diagnostic tests for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, anti-keratin antibodies and IgM rheumatoid factors. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41(7):809–814CrossRef Bas S, Perneger TV, Seitz M et al (2002) Diagnostic tests for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, anti-keratin antibodies and IgM rheumatoid factors. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41(7):809–814CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bizzaro N, Mazzanti G, Tonutti E et al (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of the anti-citrulline antibody assay for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Chem 47(6):1089–1093PubMed Bizzaro N, Mazzanti G, Tonutti E et al (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of the anti-citrulline antibody assay for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Chem 47(6):1089–1093PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sauerland U, Becker H, Seidel M et al (2005) Clinical utility of the anti-CCP assay: experiences with 700 patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1050:314–318PubMedCrossRef Sauerland U, Becker H, Seidel M et al (2005) Clinical utility of the anti-CCP assay: experiences with 700 patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1050:314–318PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ronnelid J, Wick MC, Lampa J et al (2005) Longitudinal analysis of anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (anti-CP) during 5 year follow-up in early rheumatoid arthritis: anti-CP status is a stable phenotype that predicts worse disease activity and greater radiological progression. Ann Rheum Dis 64(12):1744–1749PubMedCrossRef Ronnelid J, Wick MC, Lampa J et al (2005) Longitudinal analysis of anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (anti-CP) during 5 year follow-up in early rheumatoid arthritis: anti-CP status is a stable phenotype that predicts worse disease activity and greater radiological progression. Ann Rheum Dis 64(12):1744–1749PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kroot EJ, de Jong BA, van Leeuwen MA et al (2000) The prognostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43(8):1831–1835PubMedCrossRef Kroot EJ, de Jong BA, van Leeuwen MA et al (2000) The prognostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43(8):1831–1835PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Solanki K, Spellerberg M, Chapman P et al (2004) Anti-cyclic citrullinated antibodies: complementary to IgM rheumatoid factor in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Z Med J 117(1203):U1097PubMed Solanki K, Spellerberg M, Chapman P et al (2004) Anti-cyclic citrullinated antibodies: complementary to IgM rheumatoid factor in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Z Med J 117(1203):U1097PubMed
26.
go back to reference Moons KG, Biesheuvel CJ, Grobbee DE (2004) Test research versus diagnostic research. Clin Chem 50(3):473–476PubMedCrossRef Moons KG, Biesheuvel CJ, Grobbee DE (2004) Test research versus diagnostic research. Clin Chem 50(3):473–476PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Wolfe F (1998) A comparison of IgM rheumatoid factor by nephelometry and latex methods: clinical and laboratory significance. Arthritis Care Res 11(2):89–93PubMedCrossRef Wolfe F (1998) A comparison of IgM rheumatoid factor by nephelometry and latex methods: clinical and laboratory significance. Arthritis Care Res 11(2):89–93PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Knight RK, Pritchard MH (1982) Nephelometry compared with differential antibody titre in routine rheumatoid factor measurements. Ann Rheum Dis 41(4):426–430PubMed Knight RK, Pritchard MH (1982) Nephelometry compared with differential antibody titre in routine rheumatoid factor measurements. Ann Rheum Dis 41(4):426–430PubMed
30.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P (1985) Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. Little, Brown & Co, Boston Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P (1985) Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. Little, Brown & Co, Boston
31.
32.
go back to reference Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J (1986) The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110(8):689–693PubMed Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J (1986) The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110(8):689–693PubMed
33.
go back to reference Wolfe F, Cathey MA, Roberts FK (1991) The latex test revisited. Rheumatoid factor testing in 8,287 rheumatic disease patients. Arthritis Rheum 34(8):951–960PubMedCrossRef Wolfe F, Cathey MA, Roberts FK (1991) The latex test revisited. Rheumatoid factor testing in 8,287 rheumatic disease patients. Arthritis Rheum 34(8):951–960PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Visser H, Gelinck LB, Kampfraath AH et al (1996) Diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of the enzyme linked immunosorbent rheumatoid factor assays in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 55(3):157–161PubMedCrossRef Visser H, Gelinck LB, Kampfraath AH et al (1996) Diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of the enzyme linked immunosorbent rheumatoid factor assays in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 55(3):157–161PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, de Jong BA, Berglin E et al (2003) Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and IgA rheumatoid factor predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48(10):2741–2749PubMedCrossRef Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, de Jong BA, Berglin E et al (2003) Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and IgA rheumatoid factor predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48(10):2741–2749PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anti-CCP antibodies have more diagnostic impact than rheumatoid factor (RF) in a population tested for RF
Authors
I. G. Silveira
R. W. Burlingame
C. A. von Mühlen
A. L. Bender
H. L. Staub
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0601-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Clinical Rheumatology 11/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.