Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Artificial Organs 2/2022

15-09-2021 | Electrocardiography | Original Article

Interference of a ventricular assist device with magnetic navigation during insertion of Sherlock 3CG™, a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter

Authors: Masashi Takakura, Tasuku Fujii, Shogo Suzuki, Kimitoshi Nishiwaki

Published in: Journal of Artificial Organs | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Recently, the Sherlock 3CG™ Tip Confirmation System, including a magnetic tracking system and an intracavitary electrocardiography guidance system, has been introduced for bedside peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion. Magnetic field sources interfere with the magnetic tracking system. Electromagnetic interference of the ventricular assist device (VAD) has already been reported with various devices but not on Sherlock 3CG™. We assessed the availability of the magnetic tracking system in patients with and without a VAD during Sherlock 3CG™ insertion and evaluated the rate of optimal PICC tip position. We retrospectively reviewed 99 patients who had undergone PICC insertion using Sherlock 3CG™ on the bedside at our institutional intensive care unit from February 2018 to December 2020. Patients were divided into groups with and without a VAD. The availability of magnetic navigation and the success rate of optimal catheter tip position in each group were assessed. Among 87 cases analyzed, there were 12 and 75 cases with a VAD and without a VAD, respectively. The availability of magnetic navigation during Sherlock 3CG™ insertion was significantly lower in the group with a VAD [4/12 (33%) with VAD vs. 72/75 (96%) without VAD, P < 0.001]. In addition, the rate of optimal PICC tip position was also significantly lower in the group with a VAD [6/12 (50%) vs. 63/75 (84%), P = 0.015] The VAD significantly led to magnetic tracking system failure due to its electromagnetic interference during Sherlock 3CG™ insertion and significantly reduced the success rate of PICC insertions in the optimal position.
Literature
1.
go back to reference González S, Jiménez P, Saavedra P, Macías D, Loza A, León C, et al. Five-year outcome of peripherally inserted central catheters in adults: a separated infectious and thrombotic complications analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021;42:833–41.CrossRefPubMed González S, Jiménez P, Saavedra P, Macías D, Loza A, León C, et al. Five-year outcome of peripherally inserted central catheters in adults: a separated infectious and thrombotic complications analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021;42:833–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cotogni P, Pittiruti M. Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients. World J Crit Care Med. 2014;3:80–94.CrossRef Cotogni P, Pittiruti M. Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients. World J Crit Care Med. 2014;3:80–94.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gunst M, Matsushima K, Vanek S, Gunst R, Shafi S, Frankel H. Peripherally inserted central catheters may lower the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections in patients in surgical intensive care units. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011;12:279–82.CrossRef Gunst M, Matsushima K, Vanek S, Gunst R, Shafi S, Frankel H. Peripherally inserted central catheters may lower the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections in patients in surgical intensive care units. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011;12:279–82.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Baskin JL, Pui CH, Reiss U, Wilimas JA, Metzger ML, Ribeiro RC, et al. Management of occlusion and thrombosis associated with long-term indwelling central venous catheters. Lancet. 2009;374:159–69.CrossRef Baskin JL, Pui CH, Reiss U, Wilimas JA, Metzger ML, Ribeiro RC, et al. Management of occlusion and thrombosis associated with long-term indwelling central venous catheters. Lancet. 2009;374:159–69.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Amerasekera SS, Jones CM, Patel R, Cleasby MJ. Imaging of the complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:832–40.CrossRef Amerasekera SS, Jones CM, Patel R, Cleasby MJ. Imaging of the complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:832–40.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Johnston AJ, Bishop SM, Martin L, See TC, Streater CT. Defining peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and an evaluation of insertions in one unit. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:484–91.CrossRef Johnston AJ, Bishop SM, Martin L, See TC, Streater CT. Defining peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and an evaluation of insertions in one unit. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:484–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Glauser F, Breault S, Rigamonti F, Sotiriadis C, Jouannic AM, Qanadli SD. Tip malposition of peripherally inserted central catheters: a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare bedside insertion to fluoroscopically guided placement. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2843–9.CrossRef Glauser F, Breault S, Rigamonti F, Sotiriadis C, Jouannic AM, Qanadli SD. Tip malposition of peripherally inserted central catheters: a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare bedside insertion to fluoroscopically guided placement. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2843–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jeon Y, Ryu HG, Yoon SZ, Kim JH, Bahk JH. Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of ECG-guided central venous catheter placement. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:978–83.CrossRef Jeon Y, Ryu HG, Yoon SZ, Kim JH, Bahk JH. Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of ECG-guided central venous catheter placement. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:978–83.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gordon JS, Maynes EJ, O’Malley TJ, Pavri BB, Tchantchaleishvili V. Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a review. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;61:1–10.CrossRef Gordon JS, Maynes EJ, O’Malley TJ, Pavri BB, Tchantchaleishvili V. Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a review. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;61:1–10.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saeed D, Albert A, Westenfeld R, Maxhera B, Gramsch-Zabel H, O’Connor S, et al. Left ventricular assist device in a patient with a concomitant subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:e32–3.CrossRef Saeed D, Albert A, Westenfeld R, Maxhera B, Gramsch-Zabel H, O’Connor S, et al. Left ventricular assist device in a patient with a concomitant subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:e32–3.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sehatbakhsh S, Kushnir A, Kabach M, Kolek M, Chait R, Ghumman W. A case of electromagnetic interference between HeartMate 3 LVAD and implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:218–20.CrossRef Sehatbakhsh S, Kushnir A, Kabach M, Kolek M, Chait R, Ghumman W. A case of electromagnetic interference between HeartMate 3 LVAD and implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:218–20.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Johnston AJ, Holder A, Bishop SM, See TC, Streater CT. Evaluation of the Sherlock 3CG Tip Confirmation System on peripherally inserted central catheter malposition rates. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:1322–30.CrossRef Johnston AJ, Holder A, Bishop SM, See TC, Streater CT. Evaluation of the Sherlock 3CG Tip Confirmation System on peripherally inserted central catheter malposition rates. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:1322–30.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Baskin KM, Jimenez RM, Cahill AM, Jawad AF, Towbin RB. Cavoatrial junction and central venous anatomy: implications for central venous access tip position. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:359–65.CrossRef Baskin KM, Jimenez RM, Cahill AM, Jawad AF, Towbin RB. Cavoatrial junction and central venous anatomy: implications for central venous access tip position. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:359–65.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G, Dolcetti L, Emoli A. Clinical use of Sherlock-3CG® for positioning peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Access. 2019;20:356–61.CrossRef Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G, Dolcetti L, Emoli A. Clinical use of Sherlock-3CG® for positioning peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Access. 2019;20:356–61.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Barton A. Confirming PICC tip position during insertion with real-time information. Br J Nurs. 2016;25:S17-21.CrossRef Barton A. Confirming PICC tip position during insertion with real-time information. Br J Nurs. 2016;25:S17-21.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interference of a ventricular assist device with magnetic navigation during insertion of Sherlock 3CG™, a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter
Authors
Masashi Takakura
Tasuku Fujii
Shogo Suzuki
Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
Publication date
15-09-2021
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Journal of Artificial Organs / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1434-7229
Electronic ISSN: 1619-0904
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-021-01293-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Journal of Artificial Organs 2/2022 Go to the issue