Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 6/2022

27-09-2022 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

Retrorectus mesh reinforcement of ileostomy site fascial closure: stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR) trial phase I/II results

Authors: R. D. Shaw, J. L. Goldwag, L. R. Wilson, S. J. Ivatury, M. J. Tsapakos, E. M. Pauli, M. Z. Wilson

Published in: Hernia | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Loop ileostomy (LI) is commonly employed during colorectal surgeries to reduce the consequences of anastomotic leak. Unfortunately, LI is associated with a 10–30% incisional hernia (IH) rate after closure. We hypothesized that prophylactic mesh reinforcement during LI takedown would safely prevent subsequent IH formation.

Methods

This single-center, phase I/II prospective study evaluated adult patients undergoing LI closure after left-sided colorectal cancer procedures. After LI closure, the posterior rectus sheath was mobilized and reapproximated with absorbable suture. A reduced-weight, macroporous, polypropylene mesh (Softmesh, BD) was placed in the retrorectus position to allow 3 cm of overlap and secured with fibrin sealant. The anterior fascia was closed with slowly absorbable suture. CT images obtained for cancer surveillance were reviewed by a radiologist blinded to the study intervention to evaluate for evidence of hernia or surgical site occurrence (SSO).

Results

Twenty patients were included with mean defect and mesh sizes of 11.2 cm2 and 64.2 cm2, respectively. Mean operative time for LI takedown and mesh augmented closure was 84 min with mesh implantation time being 16.4 min. Two patients were readmitted within 30 days for ileus, no patient required procedural intervention. Over a mean follow-up period of 20 ± 7 months, no SSO or hernias were observed clinically or on CT imaging.

Conclusion

In our small series, retromuscular mesh reinforcement of LI closure appears feasible, safe and effective. This mesh reinforcement approach should be further investigated to evaluate its long-term effectiveness.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Sharp SP, Francis JK, Valerian BT, Canete JJ, Chismark AD, Lee EC (2015) Incidence of ostomy site incisional hernias after stoma closure. The Am Surg 81(12):1244–1248CrossRefPubMed Sharp SP, Francis JK, Valerian BT, Canete JJ, Chismark AD, Lee EC (2015) Incidence of ostomy site incisional hernias after stoma closure. The Am Surg 81(12):1244–1248CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and the West Midlands Res Collaborative (2016) Feasibility study from a randomized controlled trial of standard closure of a stoma site vs biological mesh reinforcement. Colorectal Dis 18(9):889–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13310CrossRef Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and the West Midlands Res Collaborative (2016) Feasibility study from a randomized controlled trial of standard closure of a stoma site vs biological mesh reinforcement. Colorectal Dis 18(9):889–896. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​codi.​13310CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Res Collaborative (2020) Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 395(10222):417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32637-6CrossRef Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Res Collaborative (2020) Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 395(10222):417–426. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(19)32637-6CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retrorectus mesh reinforcement of ileostomy site fascial closure: stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR) trial phase I/II results
Authors
R. D. Shaw
J. L. Goldwag
L. R. Wilson
S. J. Ivatury
M. J. Tsapakos
E. M. Pauli
M. Z. Wilson
Publication date
27-09-2022
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02681-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Hernia 6/2022 Go to the issue