Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Hernia
Published in: Hernia 5/2020

Open Access 01-10-2020 | Inguinal Hernia | Original Article

Litigation claims following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs

Authors: R. Varley, C. Lo, B. Alkhaffaf

Published in: Hernia | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Groin hernia repair is the most frequently performed general surgical operation in the UK. Complications from laparoscopic and open repair are well recognised; however, potential differences are yet to be considered in relation to litigation.

Methods

Administrative data were obtained and analysed from the NHS Litigation Authority for inguinal hernia-related claims from 1995 to 2016. Claims identified as using an open or laparoscopic approach were compared.

Results

880 claims were made, 760 had been settled. 88 laparoscopic and 241 open procedures were identified; 65% laparoscopic and 63% open hernia claims were found to be in favour of the claimant. Payouts totalled to 4.1GBP/4.8EUR/5.3USD million and 9.4GBP/11.0EUR/12.1USD million for laparoscopic (mean 82,824GBP/96,579EUR/106,453USD) and open (mean 66,796GBP/77,892EUR/85,852USD) approaches, respectively. The most common reasons for claim initiation were visceral/vascular injury (54%) in the laparoscopic group, and testicular complications or chronic pain (35%) in the open group. Additional procedures were necessary for 48% and 44% of laparoscopic and open claims, respectively. The highest average payouts were associated with visceral injury, (laparoscopic 116,482GBP/135,820EUR/149,715USD; open 199,103GBP/232,246EUR/255,905USD) and vascular injury (laparoscopic 88,624GBP/103,369EUR/113,892USD; open 64,460GBP/75,163EUR/82,870USD). Additional procedures resulted in an average payout of 93,352GBP/108,917EUR/120,008USD (laparoscopic) and 60,408GBP/70,506EUR/77,657USD (open). The most common additional procedures were corrective visceral/vascular repairs, orchidectomy and recurrent hernia repair.

Conclusions

The rate of litigation for clinical negligence in inguinal hernia surgery in the UK is increasing. Whilst there has been a recent increase in laparoscopic hernia repair claims, the volume and burden of claims related to open procedures remain greater.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1996) Inguinal hernia repair: Incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 25(4):835–839CrossRef
4.
Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) Litigation following groin hernia repair in England. Hernia 14(2):181–186CrossRef
5.
O'Reilly EA, Burke JP, O'Connell PR (2012) A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 255(5):846–853CrossRef
6.
McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM, Collaboration EHT (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1:CD001785
7.
Alkhenizan AH, Shafiq MR (2018) The process of litigation for medical errors in Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. Saudi Med J 39(11):1075–1081CrossRef
8.
Paajanen H, Scheinin T, Vironen J (2010) Commentary: Nationwide analysis of complications related to inguinal hernia surgery in Finland: a 5 year register study of 55,000 operations. Am J Surg 199(6):746–751CrossRef
9.
Group H (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165CrossRef
10.
Nordin P, Ahlberg J, Johansson H, Holmberg H, Hafstrom L (2017) Risk factors for injuries associated with damage claims following groin hernia repair. Hernia 21(2):215–221CrossRef
11.
Oyebode F (2013) Clinical errors and medical negligence. Med Princ Pract 22(4):323–333CrossRef
12.
Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A (1994) Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet 343(8913):1609–1613CrossRef
13.
Bryden D, Storey I (2011) Duty of care and medical negligence. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 11(4):124–127CrossRef
14.
15.
Hoosein MM, Towse H, Conn G, Stoker DL (2008) Consenting practice for open inguinal hernia repairs—are we failing to warn patients of serious complications? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(8):643–646CrossRef
16.
Shiwani MH, Gosling J (2009) Variations in the quality of consent for open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Hernia 13(1):73–76CrossRef
17.
Kerrigan DD, Thevasagayam RS, Woods TO, McWelch I, Thomas WEG, Shorthouse AJ et al (1993) Whos afraid of informed consent. BMJ 306(6873):298–300CrossRef
18.
Lemaire R (2006) Informed consent—a contemporary myth? J Bone Jt Surg Br 88(1):2–7CrossRef
19.
Patel M, Garcea G, Fairhurst K, Dennison AR (2012) Patient perception of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia, the hard sell. Hernia 16(4):411–415CrossRef
20.
Hall DE, Hanusa BH, Fine MJ, Arnold RM (2015) Do surgeons and patients discuss what they document on consent forms? J Surg Res 197(1):67–77CrossRef
21.
Rymeski B, Marchildon M, Katz DA, Vinocur CD, Dunn SP, Reichard KW et al (2010) Pilot study using an Internet-based program in informed consent. J Pediatr Surg 45(6):1137–1141CrossRef
22.
Augenstein VA, Colavita PD, Wormer BA, Walters AL, Bradley JF, Lincourt AE et al (2015) CeDAR: Carolinas Equation for Determining Associated Risks 2015. J Am Coll Surg 221(4):S65–S66CrossRef
23.
Barbot J, Parizot I, Winance M (2014) No-fault compensation for victims of medical injuries. Ten years of implementing the French model. Health Policy 114(2–3):236–245CrossRef
24.
Erichsen M (2001) The Danish patient insurance system. Med Law 20(3):355–369PubMed
25.
Vandersteegen T, Marneffe W, Cleemput I, Vereeck L (2015) The impact of no-fault compensation on health care expenditures: an empirical study of OECD countries. Health Policy 119(3):367–374CrossRef
26.
Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM (1994) The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med 154(12):1365–1370CrossRef
27.
Köckerling F, Sheen AJ, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Cuccurullo D, Fortelny R et al (2019) Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project. Hernia 23(2):185–203CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Litigation claims following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs
Authors
R. Varley
C. Lo
B. Alkhaffaf
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Paris
Keyword
Inguinal Hernia
Published in
Hernia / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02173-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Hernia 5/2020 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Wrong conclusion in meta-analysis

Review

Imaging modalities for inguinal hernia diagnosis: a systematic review

Original Article

Polytetrafluoroethylene versus polypropylene mesh during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia: short- and long-term results of a double-blind clinical randomized controlled trial

Review

A manual reduction of hernia under analgesia/sedation (Taxis) in the acute inguinal hernia: a useful technique in COVID-19 times to reduce the need for emergency surgery—a literature review

Review

Fibrin versus cyanoacrylate glue for fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a network meta-analysis and indirect comparison

Original Article

European Hernia Society (EHS) guidance for the management of adult patients with a hernia during the COVID-19 pandemic