Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 2/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Inguinal Hernia | Review

Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project

Authors: F. Köckerling, A. J. Sheen, F. Berrevoet, G. Campanelli, D. Cuccurullo, R. Fortelny, H. Friis-Andersen, J. F. Gillion, J. Gorjanc, D. Kopelman, M. Lopez-Cano, S. Morales-Conde, J. Österberg, W. Reinpold, R. K. J. Simmermacher, M. Smietanski, D. Weyhe, M. P. Simons

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

There is a need for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons because of the increasing complexity of hernia surgery procedures due to new techniques, more difficult cases and a tailored approach with an increasing public awareness demanding optimal treatment results. Therefore, the requirements for accredited/certified hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons should be formulated by the international and national hernia societies, while taking account of the respective health care systems.

Methods

The European Hernia Society (EHS) has appointed a working group composed of 18 hernia experts from all regions of Europe (ACCESS Group—Hernia Accreditation and Certification of Centers and Surgeons—Working Group) to formulate scientifically based requirements for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons while taking into consideration different health care systems. A consensus was reached on the key questions by means of a meeting, a telephone conference and the exchange of contributions. The requirements formulated below were deemed implementable by all participating hernia experts in their respective countries.

Results

The ACCESS Group suggests for an adequately equipped hernia center the following requirements: (a) to be accredited/certified by a national or international hernia society, (b) to perform a higher case volume in all types of hernia surgery compared to an average general surgery department in their country, (c) to be staffed by experienced hernia surgeons who are beyond the learning curve for all types of hernia surgery recommended in the guidelines and are responsible for education and training of hernia surgery in their department, (d) to treat hernia patients according to the current guidelines and scientific recommendations, (e) to document each case prospectively in a registry or quality assurance database (f) to perform follow-up for comparison of their own results with benchmark data for continuous improvement of their treatment results and ensuring contribution to research in hernia treatment. To become a specialist hernia surgeon, the ACCESS Group suggests a general surgeon to master the learning curve of all open and laparo-endoscopic hernia procedures recommended in the guidelines, perform a high caseload and additionally to implement and fulfill the other requirements for a hernia center.

Conclusion

Based on the above requirements formulated by the European Hernia Society for accredited/certified hernia centers and hernia specialist surgeons, the national and international hernia societies can now develop their own programs, while taking account of their specific health care systems.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bauchner H, Fontanarose PB, Thompson AE (2015) Professionalism, governance, and self-regulation of medicine. JAMA 313:18 Bauchner H, Fontanarose PB, Thompson AE (2015) Professionalism, governance, and self-regulation of medicine. JAMA 313:18
2.
go back to reference Wilson ARM, Marotti L, Bianchi S et al (2013) The requirements of a specialist breast centre. Eur J Cancer 49:3579–3587CrossRefPubMed Wilson ARM, Marotti L, Bianchi S et al (2013) The requirements of a specialist breast centre. Eur J Cancer 49:3579–3587CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Alkhenizan A, Shaw C (2011) Impact of accreditation on the quality of health care services: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Saudi Med 31:407–416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alkhenizan A, Shaw C (2011) Impact of accreditation on the quality of health care services: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Saudi Med 31:407–416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
26.
go back to reference Roll S (2012) A global vision for hernia repair improvement. Gen Surg News 39:01 Roll S (2012) A global vision for hernia repair improvement. Gen Surg News 39:01
29.
go back to reference Miller G (2010) Hernia centers of excellence? Gen Surg News 37:08 Miller G (2010) Hernia centers of excellence? Gen Surg News 37:08
40.
go back to reference Eker H, Hanson B, Buunen M et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 148(3):259CrossRefPubMed Eker H, Hanson B, Buunen M et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 148(3):259CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Clarke J (2009) Incisional hernia repair by fascial component separation: results in 128 cases and evolution of technique. Am J Surg 200:2–8CrossRef Clarke J (2009) Incisional hernia repair by fascial component separation: results in 128 cases and evolution of technique. Am J Surg 200:2–8CrossRef
43.
go back to reference O’Malley AS, Reschovsky JD (2011) Health Care Reform. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians. Arch Intern Med 171(1):56–65CrossRefPubMed O’Malley AS, Reschovsky JD (2011) Health Care Reform. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians. Arch Intern Med 171(1):56–65CrossRefPubMed
44.
46.
go back to reference Kravet SJ (2006) Morbidity and mortality conference, grand rounds, and the ACGME’s core competencies. J Gen Intern Med 2006:1192–1194 Kravet SJ (2006) Morbidity and mortality conference, grand rounds, and the ACGME’s core competencies. J Gen Intern Med 2006:1192–1194
49.
go back to reference Trujillo CN, Fowler A, Al-Temimi MH et al (2018) Complex ventral hernia: a review of past to present. Perm J 22:17-015PubMed Trujillo CN, Fowler A, Al-Temimi MH et al (2018) Complex ventral hernia: a review of past to present. Perm J 22:17-015PubMed
51.
go back to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management (2012) Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on acute pain management. Anesthesiology 100:1573–1581 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management (2012) Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on acute pain management. Anesthesiology 100:1573–1581
60.
go back to reference McNeil JJ, Evans SM, Johnson NP, Cameron PA (2010) Clinical-quality registries: their role in quality improvement. MJA 192(5):244–245 McNeil JJ, Evans SM, Johnson NP, Cameron PA (2010) Clinical-quality registries: their role in quality improvement. MJA 192(5):244–245
61.
go back to reference Evans SM, Scott IA, Johnson NP, Cameron PA, McNeil JJ (2011) Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward. Med J Aust 194:360–363PubMed Evans SM, Scott IA, Johnson NP, Cameron PA, McNeil JJ (2011) Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward. Med J Aust 194:360–363PubMed
63.
go back to reference Landro L (2015) How to make surgery safer. Wall Street J 16:2015 Landro L (2015) How to make surgery safer. Wall Street J 16:2015
68.
go back to reference Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island (2014) Comprehensive Hernia Center. Rhode Island Med J 63 Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island (2014) Comprehensive Hernia Center. Rhode Island Med J 63
76.
go back to reference Weyhe D, Tabriz N, Sahlmann B, Uslar VN (2017) Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review. Innov Surg Sci 2:47–52PubMedPubMedCentral Weyhe D, Tabriz N, Sahlmann B, Uslar VN (2017) Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review. Innov Surg Sci 2:47–52PubMedPubMedCentral
78.
go back to reference Helgstrand F (2016) National results after ventral hernia repair. Dan Med J 64:85258 Helgstrand F (2016) National results after ventral hernia repair. Dan Med J 64:85258
79.
go back to reference Köckerling F, Schug-Paß C, Adolf D et al (2015) Is pooled data analysis of ventral and incisional hernia repair acceptable? Front Surg 2:15PubMedPubMedCentral Köckerling F, Schug-Paß C, Adolf D et al (2015) Is pooled data analysis of ventral and incisional hernia repair acceptable? Front Surg 2:15PubMedPubMedCentral
80.
go back to reference Awaiz A, Rahman F, Hossain MB et al (2015) Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparascopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia. Hernia 19:449–463CrossRefPubMed Awaiz A, Rahman F, Hossain MB et al (2015) Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparascopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia. Hernia 19:449–463CrossRefPubMed
84.
go back to reference Holm H (2000) Should doctors get CME points for reading? Yes: relaxing documentation doesn’t imply relaxing accountability. BMJ 320:395–396CrossRef Holm H (2000) Should doctors get CME points for reading? Yes: relaxing documentation doesn’t imply relaxing accountability. BMJ 320:395–396CrossRef
87.
go back to reference Mishra S (2016) Do medical conferences have a role to play? Sharpen the saw. Indian Heart J 68:111–113 Mishra S (2016) Do medical conferences have a role to play? Sharpen the saw. Indian Heart J 68:111–113
91.
go back to reference National Academy of Sciences (2010) Challenges in clinical research. NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine Institutes of Health. Bookshelf ID: NBK50888 National Academy of Sciences (2010) Challenges in clinical research. NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine Institutes of Health. Bookshelf ID: NBK50888
Metadata
Title
Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project
Authors
F. Köckerling
A. J. Sheen
F. Berrevoet
G. Campanelli
D. Cuccurullo
R. Fortelny
H. Friis-Andersen
J. F. Gillion
J. Gorjanc
D. Kopelman
M. Lopez-Cano
S. Morales-Conde
J. Österberg
W. Reinpold
R. K. J. Simmermacher
M. Smietanski
D. Weyhe
M. P. Simons
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1873-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Hernia 2/2019 Go to the issue

Acknowledgement to Referees

Acknowledgement to referees 2018