Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 1/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Article

Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open transversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes

Authors: J. T. Halka, A. Vasyluk, A. Demare, A. Iacco, R. Janczyk

Published in: Hernia | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although the open transversus abdominis release (oTAR) is an effective operation for large ventral hernias, it is historically associated with a relatively long length of stay. Robotic retromuscular transversus abdominis release (rTAR) allows minimally invasive repair of complex ventral hernias with shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to open repairs (TAR), but hybrid robotic TAR (hrTAR), partial open intervention via incision through the overlying hernia sac for fascial closure, may be required to accomplish effective repair of large defects. We compare LOS and short-term outcomes of a cohort of our hrTAR patients to our historical oTAR patients.

Methods

All hrTAR performed in our institution between November 2015 and July 2017 contained in a prospectively maintained robotic database and/or in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) database were analyzed. Additionally, open TAR patients maintained in a prospective personal database and/or in the AHSQC from September 2013 to August 2016 were similarly analyzed and compared with hrTAR patients.

Results

134 TAR patients and 49 hrTAR patients were analyzed. Age, gender, BMI, HTN, DM, and proportion of recurrent hernia were not significantly different. Hernia width (14.3 cm vs 14.0 cm, p = 0.80) and length (21.9 vs 20.0 cm, p = 0.10) were similar between groups. Mean operative times did not differ significantly between groups (274 min vs 304 min p = 0.06). Thirty day wound events including SSI and SSOPI were not significantly different between groups. LOS was significantly shorter in the hrTAR group (3 vs 7 days, p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) may be performed with significantly lower LOS, similar wound morbidity and complication profile compared to open TAR. This novel surgical technique provides a minimally invasive option for a challenging subset of large ventral hernias which cannot be treated effectively with a purely robotic approach and would traditionally require and open operation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 (discussion 583–5) Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 (discussion 583–5)
2.
go back to reference Iqbal CW et al (2007) Long-term outcome of 254 complex incisional hernia repairs using the modified Rives-Stoppa technique. World J Surg 31(12):2398–2404CrossRefPubMed Iqbal CW et al (2007) Long-term outcome of 254 complex incisional hernia repairs using the modified Rives-Stoppa technique. World J Surg 31(12):2398–2404CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Temudom T, Siadati M, Sarr MG (1996) Repair of complex giant or recurrent ventral hernias by using tension-free intraparietal prosthetic mesh (Stoppa technique): lessons learned from our initial experience (fifty patients). Surgery 120(4):738–743 (discussion 743–744) CrossRef Temudom T, Siadati M, Sarr MG (1996) Repair of complex giant or recurrent ventral hernias by using tension-free intraparietal prosthetic mesh (Stoppa technique): lessons learned from our initial experience (fifty patients). Surgery 120(4):738–743 (discussion 743–744) CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Novitsky YW et al (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204(5):709–716CrossRefPubMed Novitsky YW et al (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204(5):709–716CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Novitsky YW et al (2016) Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg 264(2):226–232CrossRefPubMed Novitsky YW et al (2016) Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg 264(2):226–232CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Belyansky I, Zahiri HR, Park A (2016) Laparoscopic transversus abdominis release, a novel minimally invasive approach to complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov 23(2):134–141CrossRefPubMed Belyansky I, Zahiri HR, Park A (2016) Laparoscopic transversus abdominis release, a novel minimally invasive approach to complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov 23(2):134–141CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Carbonell AM et al (2017) Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Ann Surg 267:210–217CrossRef Carbonell AM et al (2017) Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Ann Surg 267:210–217CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Warren JA et al (2017) Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 31(1):324–332CrossRefPubMed Warren JA et al (2017) Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 31(1):324–332CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Prabhu AS et al (2017) Laparoscopic vs robotic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia: an Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis. J Am Coll Surg 225(2):285–293CrossRefPubMed Prabhu AS et al (2017) Laparoscopic vs robotic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia: an Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis. J Am Coll Surg 225(2):285–293CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Halka JT et al (2017) Robotic and hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release may be performed with low length of stay and wound morbidity. Am J Surg 215:462–465CrossRefPubMed Halka JT et al (2017) Robotic and hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release may be performed with low length of stay and wound morbidity. Am J Surg 215:462–465CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open transversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes
Authors
J. T. Halka
A. Vasyluk
A. Demare
A. Iacco
R. Janczyk
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1858-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Hernia 1/2019 Go to the issue