Top

Hernia

Published in:

01-04-2017 | Original Article

Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement

Authors: D. Kokotovic, I. Gögenur, F. Helgstrand

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2017

Abstract

Purpose

Benign elective procedures give rise to heterogeneity in indication for surgery and surgical technique among specialized surgeons in a variety of surgical fields. The objective was to analyze the extent of agreement in surgical management among expert hernia surgeons when evaluating the same patient in a standardized setting.

Methods

Five Danish hernia experts answered questions concerning indication for surgery and surgical technique for 25 video recorded real-life clinical cases. The experts evaluated the patients by answering a standardized questionnaire.

Results

All surgeons were experienced in incisional hernia repair with a median of 253 repairs (range 164–450 repairs). Perfect overall agreement among all the experts in indication, operation type, component separation, mesh fixation and mesh position was found in only five cases (20%). Agreement in indication for surgery was present in 14 cases (56%). The most common reason for not performing surgery was due to comorbidities. Agreement in operation type (open vs. laparoscopic) was present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh fixation (absorbable tacks/non-absorbable tacks/suture/other) method was also present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh position (onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal) was found in 40% of cases. The highest overall agreement among the surgeons was observed with regard to whether patients needed component separation (yes/no), 21 cases, (84%).

Conclusions

In a standardized setting, agreement in choice of treatment strategy for patients with incisional hernias was very low among experienced surgeons. A standardization of surgical decision making is desirable to develop new interventions and improve clinical outcomes.

Available only for authorised users

Brazzelli M, Cruickshank M, Kilonzo M, Ahmed I, Stewart F, McNamee P, Elders A, Fraser C, Avenell A, Ramsay C (2015) Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of cholecystectomy versus observation/conservative management for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 29:637–647. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3712-6 CrossRefPubMed

Darsaut TE, Estrade L, Jamali S, Bojanowski MW, Chagnon M, Raymond J (2014) Uncertainty and agreement in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 120:618–623. doi:10.3171/2013.11.jns131366 CrossRefPubMed

Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, McLain R, Shaffer W, Myers M, Glaser J, Hart RA (2005) Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine. Spine 30:2208–2213CrossRefPubMed

Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, McLain R, Shaffer W, Myers M, Glaser J, Hart RA (2005) Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part II: cervical spine. Spine 30:2214–2219CrossRefPubMed

Papic JC, Finnell SM, Leys CM, Bennett WE Jr, Downs SM (2014) Referring physicians’ decision making for pediatric anti-reflux procedures. Surgery 155:851–859. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.014 CrossRefPubMed

Petit CJ, Millett PJ, Endres NK, Diller D, Harris MB, Warner JJ (2010) Management of proximal humeral fractures: surgeons don’t agree. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:446–451. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.012 CrossRefPubMed

Vitale MG, Gomez JA, Matsumoto H, Roye DP Jr (2011) Variability of expert opinion in treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1317–1322. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1540-0 CrossRefPubMed

Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M, Friis-Andersen H, Wara P, Jorgensen LN, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2010) Establishment and initial experiences from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database. Hernia 14:131–135. doi:10.1007/s10029-009-0592-0 CrossRefPubMed

den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2

10.

Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2

11.

Pawlak M, Bury K, Smietanski M (2015) The management of abdominal wall hernias—in search of consensus. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 10:49–56. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2015.49512 PubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Nieuwenhuizen J, Kleinrensink GJ, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2008) Indications for incisional hernia repair: an international questionnaire among hernia surgeons. Hernia 12:223–225. doi:10.1007/s10029-007-0322-4 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Birkmeyer JD, Reames BN, McCulloch P, Carr AJ, Campbell WB, Wennberg JE (2013) Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. Lancet 382:1121–1129. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61215-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Janssen SJ, Teunis T, Guitton TG, Ring D (2015) Do surgeons treat their patients like they would treat themselves? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3564–3572. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4304-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Kim SW, Han HS, Jung HW, Kim KI, Hwang DW, Kang SB, Kim CH (2014) Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk. JAMA Surg 149:633–640. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.241 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hasselager R, Gögenur I (2014) Core muscle size assessed by perioperative abdominal CT scan is related to mortality, postoperative complications, and hospitalization after major abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:287–295. doi:10.1007/s00423-014-1174-x CrossRefPubMed

17.

Zhu LM, Schuster P, Klinge U (2015) Mesh implants: an overview of crucial mesh parameters. World J Surg 7:226–236. doi:10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.226

18.

Zinther NB, Wara P, Friis-Andersen H (2010) Shrinkage of intraperitoneal onlay mesh in sheep: coated polyester mesh versus covered polypropylene mesh. Hernia 14:611–615. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0682-z CrossRefPubMed

19.

Kokotovic D, Sjølander H, Gogenur I, Helgstrand F (2016) Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe. Hernia 20:281–287. doi:10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hageman MG, Jayakumar P, King JD, Guitton TG, Doornberg JN, Ring D (2015) The factors influencing the decision making of operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:21–26. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.013 CrossRef

21.

Teunis T, Janssen SJ, Guitton TG, Vranceanu AM, Goos B, Ring D (2015) Surgeon personality is associated with recommendation for operative treatment. Hand (N Y) 10:779–784. doi:10.1007/s11552-015-9755-x CrossRef

22.

Kaafarani HM (2011) Surgeon preference and variation of surgical care. Am J Surg 201:709–711. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.03.006 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Jorgensen LN, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2010) Surgical treatment of ventral hernia. Ugeskr Laeger 172:1987–1989PubMed

24.

Shaikh I, Olabi B, Wong VM, Nixon SJ, Kumar S (2011) NICE guidance and current practise of recurrent and bilateral groin hernia repair by Scottish surgeons. Hernia 15:387–391. doi:10.1007/s10029-011-0797-x CrossRefPubMed

25.

de Korte N, Klarenbeek BR, Kuyvenhoven JP, Roumen RM, Cuesta MA, Stockmann HB (2011) Management of diverticulitis: results of a survey among gastroenterologists and surgeons. Colorectal Dis 13:411–417. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02744.x CrossRef

26.

Charlton ME, Mattingly-Wells LR, Marcet JE, McMahon Waldschmidt BC, Cromwell JW (2014) Association between surgeon characteristics and their preferences for guideline-concordant staging and treatment for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 208:817–823. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Hilly O, Stern-Shavit S, Iran S, Feinmesser R (2014) Treatment decisions and adherence to guidelines in the treatment of low risk papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Isr Med Assoc J 16:548–552PubMed

28.

Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T (2013) Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216:217–228. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.013 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ecker BL, Kuo LE, Simmons KD, Fischer JP, Morris JB, Kelz RR (2016) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data. Surg Endosc 30:906–915. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4310-y CrossRefPubMed

30.

Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858. doi:10.1002/bjs.6668 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583PubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Helgstrand F, Westen M, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Strandfelt P, Bisgaard T (2015) Recurrence rate after absorbable tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 102:541–547. doi:10.1002/bjs.9750 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Eriksen JR, Bisgaard T, Assaadzadeh S, Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J (2013) Fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized controlled double-blinded study. Hernia 17:511–514. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1101-z CrossRefPubMed

34.

Bringman S, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Deprest J, Junge K, Klosterhalfen B, Parra-Davila E, Ramshaw B, Schumpelick V (2010) Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes. Hernia 14:81–87. doi:10.1007/s10029-009-0587-x CrossRefPubMed

35.

Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJ (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369:1434–1442. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1300625 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement
Authors: D. Kokotovic
I. Gögenur
F. Helgstrand
Publication date: 01-04-2017
Publisher: Springer Paris
Published in: Hernia / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices

Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Linked hospital and primary care database analysis of the impact of short-term complications on recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Long-term results and complications related to Crurasoft® mesh repair for paraesophageal hiatal hernias

Development of a standardized curriculum concept for continuing training in hernia surgery: German Hernia School

Prospective study evaluating the impact of severity of chronic pain on quality of life after inguinal hernioplasty