Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 1/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Article

Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note

Authors: C. C. Petro, E. H. Nahabet, C. N. Criss, S. B. Orenstein, H. A. von Recum, Y. W. Novitsky, M. J. Rosen

Published in: Hernia | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Uncoated, lightweight, macroporous, monofilament mesh has been shown to demonstrate improved bacterial clearance, better tissue integration, reduced foreign body response, and less chronic pain with equivalent durability for hernia repair. These findings led us to use a new lightweight monofilament polyester mesh (Parietex TCM, Covidien). Here, we report our experience with this mesh in open incisional hernia repair.

Methods

Patients undergoing incisional hernia repair with Parietex TCM were retrospectively identified within our prospectively maintained database. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and follow-up were reviewed. Outcome parameters included 90-day wound morbidity and hernia recurrence.

Results

In 2011, 36 patients (mean age 56.8; mean BMI 32.4 kg/m2) underwent open incisional hernia repair with retrorectus mesh placement by two surgeons (MJR, YWN) at Case Medical Center. Anterior and posterior fascial closure was achieved in all cases. Wound morbidity included seven surgical site occurrences: four superficial infections that resolved with antibiotics, one wound dehiscence requiring wet-to-dry packing, and two seromas that resolved without intervention. With a mean follow-up of 13 months, 8 (22 %) recurrences have occurred. On reoperation, 7 (19 %) of these patients had mechanical failure or fracturing of the mesh. No confounding variables were identified by univariate analysis of patient demographics, operative characteristics, or wound morbidity.

Conclusion

Lightweight monofilament polyester mesh (Parietex TCM) appears to have a high incidence of mechanical failure in the context of open incisional hernia repair. While this limitation may ultimately be revealed as a weakness of all lightweight mesh, surgeons should be aware that these failures have already been documented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luijendijk RW et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398PubMedCrossRef Luijendijk RW et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 discussion 583–585PubMedCentralPubMed Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 discussion 583–585PubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM (2012) Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg 25(5):330–339PubMedCrossRef Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM (2012) Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg 25(5):330–339PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Asarias JR et al (2011) Influence of mesh materials on the expression of mediators involved in wound healing. J Invest Surg 24(2):87–98PubMedCrossRef Asarias JR et al (2011) Influence of mesh materials on the expression of mediators involved in wound healing. J Invest Surg 24(2):87–98PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sanders D, Lambie J, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2013) An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence. Hernia 17(6):779–789PubMedCrossRef Sanders D, Lambie J, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2013) An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence. Hernia 17(6):779–789PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Blatnik JA et al (2012) In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2139–2144PubMedCrossRef Blatnik JA et al (2012) In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2139–2144PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bryan N et al (2012) In vitro activation of human leukocytes in response to contact with synthetic hernia meshes. Clin Biochem 45(9):672–676PubMedCrossRef Bryan N et al (2012) In vitro activation of human leukocytes in response to contact with synthetic hernia meshes. Clin Biochem 45(9):672–676PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Orenstein SB et al (2012) Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. J Surg Res 176(2):423–429PubMedCrossRef Orenstein SB et al (2012) Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. J Surg Res 176(2):423–429PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schmidbauer S et al (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253PubMed Schmidbauer S et al (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cobb WS et al (2006) Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 136(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef Cobb WS et al (2006) Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 136(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Novitsky YW et al (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204(5):709–716PubMedCrossRef Novitsky YW et al (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204(5):709–716PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zuvela M, Galun D, Djuric-Stefanovic A, Palibrk I, Petrovic M, Milicevic M (2014) Central rupture and bulging of low-weight polypropylene mesh following recurrent incisional sublay hernioplasty. Hernia 18(1):135–140PubMedCrossRef Zuvela M, Galun D, Djuric-Stefanovic A, Palibrk I, Petrovic M, Milicevic M (2014) Central rupture and bulging of low-weight polypropylene mesh following recurrent incisional sublay hernioplasty. Hernia 18(1):135–140PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ray JA et al (1981) Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153(4):497–507PubMed Ray JA et al (1981) Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153(4):497–507PubMed
15.
go back to reference Shumacker BH Jr, Mandelbaum I (1961) Clinical evaluation of dacron suture material. Arch Surg 83:647–649PubMedCrossRef Shumacker BH Jr, Mandelbaum I (1961) Clinical evaluation of dacron suture material. Arch Surg 83:647–649PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note
Authors
C. C. Petro
E. H. Nahabet
C. N. Criss
S. B. Orenstein
H. A. von Recum
Y. W. Novitsky
M. J. Rosen
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1237-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Hernia 1/2015 Go to the issue