Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Hernia
Published in: Hernia 6/2008

01-12-2008 | Original Article

Influence of mesh materials on the integrity of the vas deferens following Lichtenstein hernioplasty: an experimental model

Authors: K. Junge, M. Binnebösel, R. Rosch, A. Öttinger, M. Stumpf, G. Mühlenbruch, V. Schumpelick, U. Klinge

Published in: Hernia | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The utilization of mesh reinforcement of the inguinal area with polypropylene mesh has increased drastically over the last decade. Infertility due to obstructive azoospermia is a rare but serious complication following inguinal hernia repair, especially in young patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different mesh structures on integrity of the vas deferens.

Materials and methods

Twenty male Chinchilla rabbits were used. The spermatic cord was dissected free and a Lichtenstein repair was performed with a low-weight polypropylene mesh (UltraPro®) and a heavy-weight polypropylene mesh (Prolene®) on the contralateral side. A vasography was performed after six months in order to investigate obstructions of the vas deferens. Light microscopy of the mesh host tissue interface was also performed and the foreign body reaction analyzed. Spermatogenesis was evaluated using the Johnsen score.

Results

Vasography revealed relevant obstructions (>75% of lumen diameter) located at the mesh margins (50% of Prolene® and 22.2% of UltraPro® mesh samples). Microscopic investigation of the mesh–host tissue interface showed typical formation of foreign body granulomas. The diameters of the foreign body granulomas were significantly reduced in the UltraPro® mesh group (41.7 ± 5.5 μm) compared to the Prolene® mesh group (48.7 ± 7.7 μm). Upon investigating the percentages of apoptotic (TUNEL) and proliferating (Ki67) cells, no significant differences were found. Following Prolene® mesh implantation, a mean Johnsen score of 9.1 ± 1.2 was estimated, which was not significantly different from the UltraPro® mesh samples (8.9 ± 1.4, P > 0.05).

Conclusions

If a mesh material is needed for inguinal hernia repair in young patients, the use of modern low-weight large porous and elastic samples appears to have a beneficial effect on integrity of the vas deferens.
Literature
1.
Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 73:413–426PubMed
2.
Peiper C, Klinge U, Junge K, Schumpelick V (2002) Meshes in inguinal hernia repair. Zentralbl Chir 127:573–577PubMedCrossRef
3.
Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (1998) Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials 19:2235–2246PubMedCrossRef
4.
Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (2002) Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 26:1472–1480PubMedCrossRef
5.
Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V (2001) Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia 5:113–118PubMedCrossRef
6.
Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Ottinger AP et al (1998) Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164:951–960PubMedCrossRef
7.
Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ (2006) Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 93:1056–1059PubMedCrossRef
8.
O’dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170PubMedCrossRef
9.
Horstmann R, Hellwig M, Classen C, Rottgermann S, Palmes D (2006) Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes. World J Surg 30:1742–1749PubMedCrossRef
10.
Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 194:394–400PubMedCrossRef
11.
Johnson SG (1970) Testicular biopsy score count—a method for registration of spermatogenesis in human testes: normal values and results in 335 hypogonadal males. Hormones 1:2–25CrossRef
12.
Pollak R, Nyhus LM (1983) Complications of groin hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 63:1363–1371PubMed
13.
Shin D, Lipshultz LI, Goldstein M, Barme GA, Fuchs EF, Nagler HM, McCallum S, Niederberger C, Schoor R, Brugh V, Honig S (2005) Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg 241:553–558PubMedCrossRef
14.
Uzzo RG, Lemack GE, Morrissey KP, Goldstein M (1999) The effects of mesh bioprosthesis on the spermatic cord structures: a preliminary report in a canine model. J Urol 161:1344–1349PubMedCrossRef
15.
Goldenberg A, Matone J, Marcondes W, Herbella FA, Farah JF (2005) Comparative study of inflammatory response and adhesions formation after fixation of different meshes for inguinal hernia repair in rabbits. Acta Cir Bras 20:347–352PubMed
16.
Peiper C, Junge K, Klinge U, Strehlau E, Krones C, Ottinger A et al. (2005) The influence of inguinal mesh repair on the spermatic cord: a pilot study in the rabbit. J Invest Surg 18:273–278
17.
Berndsen FH, Bjursten LM, Simanaitis M, Montgomery A (2004) Does mesh implantation affect the spermatic cord structures after inguinal hernia surgery? An experimental study in rats. Eur Surg Res 36:318–322PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of mesh materials on the integrity of the vas deferens following Lichtenstein hernioplasty: an experimental model
Authors
K. Junge
M. Binnebösel
R. Rosch
A. Öttinger
M. Stumpf
G. Mühlenbruch
V. Schumpelick
U. Klinge
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Hernia / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0400-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Hernia 6/2008 Go to the issue

Review

The measurement of chronic pain and health-related quality of life following inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature

Original Article

A scarless technique of umbilical hernia repair in the adult population

Original Article

Contralateral inguinal hernia in childhood and youth: which child will develop a contralateral inguinal hernia?

Congress Report

Fifth Suvretta Meeting of international experts on hernia surgery, St. Moritz, Switzerland, 1st–5th July 2008

Case Report

Laparoscopic management of paraduodenal hernias: mesh and mesh-less repairs. A report of four cases

Case Report

Postherniotomy dysejaculation: successful treatment with mesh removal and nerve transection