Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Vascular Surgery 3/2005

01-05-2005

Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair via Endovascular Versus Open Retroperitoneal Approach

Authors: Manish Mehta, MD, MPH, Sean P. Roddy, MD, R. Clement Darling III, MD, Kathleen J. Ozsvath, MD, Paul B. Kreienberg, MD, Philip S.K. Paty, MD, Benjamin B. Chang, MD, Dhiraj M. Shah, MD

Published in: Annals of Vascular Surgery | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

The beneficial effects of open surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair via a left retroperitoneal approach have been established. We compared the short-term outcome of infrarenal AAA repair via an endovascular approach with that of an open retroperitoneal approach. From October 2001 to April 2003, patients with infrarenal AAA >5 cm were offered repair via an endovascular approach (group I) with a variety of industry-made stent grafts or with an open retroperitoneal surgical approach (group II). Data were prospectively collected in the vascular registry and complications were analyzed. Data comparison between the two groups was done by using chi-squared analysis and two-tailed Students t-test. Statistical significance was identified at p < 0.05. Over an 18-month period, 492 patients underwent evaluation for AAA. Of these, 446 patients had infrarenal AAA and underwent either endovascular (group I: n = 175, male 85%, female 15%) or open surgical repair (group II: n = 232, male 74%, female 26%) via a left retroperitoneal approach. Group I patients had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (66% vs. 35%, p < 0.05), hypertension (74% vs. 43%, p < 0.05), chronic obstructed pulmonary disease (29% vs. 12%, p < 0.05), and diabetes mellitus (20% vs. 7%, p < 0.05), a lower mean amount of intraoperative blood loss (277 cc vs. 1452 cc, p < 0.05), and shorter length of stay in the hospital (1.7 days vs., 7.3 days, p < 0.05). Group I also had fewer complications of myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 5.2%, p = NS), renal failure (0% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.05), pulmonary failure (1.7% vs. 2.6%, p = NS), ischemic colitis requiring colectomy (0.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.05), multisystem organ failure (0% vs. 1.3%, p = NS), and death (0.6% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.05). Despite increased preexisting comorbidities, patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair had less morbidity, mortality, and blood loss and a shorter in-hospital length of stay than patients undergoing open surgical aneurysm repair via a left retroperitoneal approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnston, KW 1989Multimember prospective study of no ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part II. Variables predicting morbidity and mortalityJ Vasc Surg9437447CrossRefPubMed Johnston, KW 1989Multimember prospective study of no ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part II. Variables predicting morbidity and mortalityJ Vasc Surg9437447CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cambria, RP, Brewster, DC, Abbott, WM, et al. 1992The impact of selective use of dipyridamole-thallium scans and surgical factors on the current morbidity of aortic surgeryJ Vasc Surg.154351CrossRefPubMed Cambria, RP, Brewster, DC, Abbott, WM,  et al. 1992The impact of selective use of dipyridamole-thallium scans and surgical factors on the current morbidity of aortic surgeryJ Vasc Surg.154351CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Katz, DJ, Stanley, JC, Zelenock, GB 1994Operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Michigan: an eleven-year statewide experienceJ Vasc Surg19804817PubMed Katz, DJ, Stanley, JC, Zelenock, GB 1994Operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Michigan: an eleven-year statewide experienceJ Vasc Surg19804817PubMed
4.
go back to reference Leather, RP, Shah, DM, Kaufman, JL, et al. 1989Comparative analysis of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal aortic replacement for aneurysmSurg Gynecol Obstet 168287293 Leather, RP, Shah, DM, Kaufman, JL,  et al. 1989Comparative analysis of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal aortic replacement for aneurysmSurg Gynecol Obstet 168287293
5.
go back to reference Darling, RC,III, Shah, DM, McClellan, WR, et al. 1992Decreased morbidity associated with retroperitoneal exclusion treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysmsJ Cardiovasc Surg336569 Darling, RC,III, Shah, DM, McClellan, WR,  et al. 1992Decreased morbidity associated with retroperitoneal exclusion treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysmsJ Cardiovasc Surg336569
6.
go back to reference Sicard, GA, Reilly, JM, Rubin, BG, et al. 1995Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trialJ Vasc Surg21174183PubMed Sicard, GA, Reilly, JM, Rubin, BG,  et al. 1995Transabdominal versus retroperitoneal incision for abdominal aortic surgery: report of a prospective randomized trialJ Vasc Surg21174183PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gregory, RT, Wheeler, JR, Snyder, SO, et al. 1989Retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgeryJ Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)30185189 Gregory, RT, Wheeler, JR, Snyder, SO,  et al. 1989Retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgeryJ Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)30185189
8.
go back to reference Quinones-Baldrich, WJ, Garner, C, Caswell, D, et al. 1999Endovascular, transperitoneal, and retroperitoneal AAA repair: results and costsJ Vasc Surg305967PubMed Quinones-Baldrich, WJ, Garner, C, Caswell, D,  et al. 1999Endovascular, transperitoneal, and retroperitoneal AAA repair: results and costsJ Vasc Surg305967PubMed
9.
go back to reference Salartash, K, Sternbergh, C,III, York, JW, Money, SR 2001Comparison of open transabdominal AAA repair with endovascular AAA repair in reduction of postoperative stress responseAnn Vasc Surg155359PubMed Salartash, K, Sternbergh, C,III, York, JW, Money, SR 2001Comparison of open transabdominal AAA repair with endovascular AAA repair in reduction of postoperative stress responseAnn Vasc Surg155359PubMed
10.
go back to reference Arko, FR, Hill, BB, Olcott, C,IV, Harris, EJ, et al. 2002Endovascular repair reduces early and late morbidity compared to open surgery for AAAJ Endovasc Ther9711718CrossRefPubMed Arko, FR, Hill, BB, Olcott, C,IV, Harris, EJ,  et al. 2002Endovascular repair reduces early and late morbidity compared to open surgery for AAAJ Endovasc Ther9711718CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bill, BB, Wolf, YG, Lee, A, et al. 2002Open versus endovascular AAA repair in patients who are morphological candidates for endovascular treatmentJ Endovasc Ther9255261CrossRefPubMed Bill, BB, Wolf, YG, Lee, A,  et al. 2002Open versus endovascular AAA repair in patients who are morphological candidates for endovascular treatmentJ Endovasc Ther9255261CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ernst, CB 1983Prevention of intestinal ischemia following abdominal aortic reconstructionSurgery93102106 Ernst, CB 1983Prevention of intestinal ischemia following abdominal aortic reconstructionSurgery93102106
13.
go back to reference Dadian, N, Ohki, T, Veith, FJ, et al. 2001Overt colon ischemia after endovascular aneurysm repair: the importance of microembolization as an etiologyJ Vasc Surg34986996CrossRefPubMed Dadian, N, Ohki, T, Veith, FJ,  et al. 2001Overt colon ischemia after endovascular aneurysm repair: the importance of microembolization as an etiologyJ Vasc Surg34986996CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ohki, T, Veith, FJ, Shaw, P, et al. 2001Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experienceAnn Surg 234323334CrossRefPubMed Ohki, T, Veith, FJ, Shaw, P,  et al. 2001Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experienceAnn Surg 234323334CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair via Endovascular Versus Open Retroperitoneal Approach
Authors
Manish Mehta, MD, MPH
Sean P. Roddy, MD
R. Clement Darling III, MD
Kathleen J. Ozsvath, MD
Paul B. Kreienberg, MD
Philip S.K. Paty, MD
Benjamin B. Chang, MD
Dhiraj M. Shah, MD
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Vascular Surgery / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0890-5096
Electronic ISSN: 1615-5947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-004-0172-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

Annals of Vascular Surgery 3/2005 Go to the issue