Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Review Article

Prosthetic versus surgical rehabilitation in patients with maxillary defect regarding the quality of life: systematic review

Authors: M. Y. Sharaf, S. I. Ibrahim, A. E. Eskander, A. F. Shaker

Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the ability of prosthetic rehabilitation versus surgical rehabilitation in improving the QOL for patients with maxillary defects.

Material and methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus data base, Cochrane database, Ovid database, and Latin America & Caribbean database for articles published before September 2017 was performed by two independent reviewers. A manual search of articles published from January 2000 to September 2017 was also conducted. Only English studies were included which evaluate the QoL in patients with head and neck cancers. Any confusion between the two independent reviewers was resolved by means of a moderated discussion between the reviewers.

Results

Five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study. Many parameters were used regarding evaluation of QOL as the EORTC Head and Neck 35 assessment, UW-QOL, OHIP-14, VAS, OFS, MHI, HAD, Body Satisfaction Scale, Oral symptom check list, Swallowing, Diet consist, Pain control, Postoperative complication, and Speech. Two studies supported the surgical line of treatment for improving the QOL as compared to the prosthetic one; another two studies showed a statistically insignificant improvement in the patients’ QOL with the surgical line, while only one revealed insignificant difference in QoL with both lines of treatment.

Conclusions

Surgical rehabilitation provides a better line of treatment in improving the QOL for patients with maxillary defects. On the other hand, prosthetic has proved effectiveness in the immediate post-surgical times as temporary strategy, and it has represented a good alternative when the surgical obturation is compromised.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Glinski B, Zabek M, Urbanski J (2006) Principles of diagnosis and treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 6:263–267 Glinski B, Zabek M, Urbanski J (2006) Principles of diagnosis and treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 6:263–267
2.
go back to reference Yanamoto S, Yamada S, Takahashi H et al (2014) Benefits of maxillectomy with internal dissection of the masticator space by transmandibular approach in the surgical management of malignant tumours of the upper gingiva and hard palate: a clinical review of 10 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 11:1319–1325CrossRef Yanamoto S, Yamada S, Takahashi H et al (2014) Benefits of maxillectomy with internal dissection of the masticator space by transmandibular approach in the surgical management of malignant tumours of the upper gingiva and hard palate: a clinical review of 10 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 11:1319–1325CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nagy J, Braunitzer G, Antal M et al (2014) QOL in head and neck cancer patients after tumor therapy and subsequent rehabilitation: an exploratory study. Qual Life Res 1:135–143CrossRef Nagy J, Braunitzer G, Antal M et al (2014) QOL in head and neck cancer patients after tumor therapy and subsequent rehabilitation: an exploratory study. Qual Life Res 1:135–143CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yucel A, Cinar C, Aydin Y et al (2000) Malignant tumors requiring maxillectomy. J Craniofac Surg 11:418–429CrossRefPubMed Yucel A, Cinar C, Aydin Y et al (2000) Malignant tumors requiring maxillectomy. J Craniofac Surg 11:418–429CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Baliarsing AS, Vinay VK, Neelima AM, Dilip KB (2010) Reconstruction of maxillectomy defects using deep circumflex iliac artery-based composite free flap. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:8–13CrossRef Baliarsing AS, Vinay VK, Neelima AM, Dilip KB (2010) Reconstruction of maxillectomy defects using deep circumflex iliac artery-based composite free flap. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:8–13CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10:19–28CrossRefPubMed Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10:19–28CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Argerakis GP (1990) Psychosocial considerations of the post-treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Dent Clin N Am 34:285–305PubMed Argerakis GP (1990) Psychosocial considerations of the post-treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Dent Clin N Am 34:285–305PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hammerlid E, Persson L, Sulivan M, Westin T (1999) Quality-of-life effects of psychosocial intervention in patients with head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:507–516CrossRefPubMed Hammerlid E, Persson L, Sulivan M, Westin T (1999) Quality-of-life effects of psychosocial intervention in patients with head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:507–516CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rieger JM, Tang JA, Wolfaardt J, Harris J, Seikaly H (2011) Comparison of speech and aesthetic outcomes in patients with maxillary reconstruction versus maxillary obturators after maxillectomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 40(1):40–47PubMed Rieger JM, Tang JA, Wolfaardt J, Harris J, Seikaly H (2011) Comparison of speech and aesthetic outcomes in patients with maxillary reconstruction versus maxillary obturators after maxillectomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 40(1):40–47PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW, Shah JP, Spiro RH, Holland JC (1996) Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck 18(4):323–334. Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW, Shah JP, Spiro RH, Holland JC (1996) Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck 18(4):323–334.
25.
go back to reference Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, O’Ryan F, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (2014) American Association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jawse2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(10):1938–1956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.031 CrossRefPubMed Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, O’Ryan F, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (2014) American Association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jawse2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(10):1938–1956. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​joms.​2014.​04.​031 CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bodard AG, Bemer J, Gourmet R et al (2011) Dental implants and free fibula flap: 23 patients. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 112:1–4CrossRef Bodard AG, Bemer J, Gourmet R et al (2011) Dental implants and free fibula flap: 23 patients. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 112:1–4CrossRef
29.
go back to reference WHOQOL (1995) The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 41:1403–1409CrossRef WHOQOL (1995) The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 41:1403–1409CrossRef
30.
go back to reference WHOQOL (1996) What quality of life? The WHOQOL group. World Health Organization quality of life assessment. World Health Forum 17:354–356 WHOQOL (1996) What quality of life? The WHOQOL group. World Health Organization quality of life assessment. World Health Forum 17:354–356
32.
go back to reference Wang F, Huang W, Zhang C, Sun J, Qu X, Wu Y (2016) Functional outcome and quality of life after a maxillectomy: a comparison between an implant supported obturator and implant supported fixed prostheses in a free vascularized flap. Clin Oral Impl Res 00:1–7 Wang F, Huang W, Zhang C, Sun J, Qu X, Wu Y (2016) Functional outcome and quality of life after a maxillectomy: a comparison between an implant supported obturator and implant supported fixed prostheses in a free vascularized flap. Clin Oral Impl Res 00:1–7
35.
go back to reference Welch V, Petticrew M, Tugwell P, Moher D, O’Neill J, Waters E et al (2012) PRISMA-equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLoS Med 9:1–7CrossRef Welch V, Petticrew M, Tugwell P, Moher D, O’Neill J, Waters E et al (2012) PRISMA-equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLoS Med 9:1–7CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rieger J, Bohle Iii G, Huryn J, Tang JL, Harris J, Seikaly H (2009) Surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic obturation of extensive soft palate defects: a comparison of speech outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 22(6):566–572PubMed Rieger J, Bohle Iii G, Huryn J, Tang JL, Harris J, Seikaly H (2009) Surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic obturation of extensive soft palate defects: a comparison of speech outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 22(6):566–572PubMed
37.
go back to reference Borlase G (2000) Use of obturators in rehabilitation of maxillectomy defects. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 15:75–79PubMed Borlase G (2000) Use of obturators in rehabilitation of maxillectomy defects. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 15:75–79PubMed
41.
go back to reference Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM, Lorenz W, Koller M (2004) Quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after treatment for malignancy. Int J Prosthodont 17(6):657–665PubMed Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM, Lorenz W, Koller M (2004) Quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after treatment for malignancy. Int J Prosthodont 17(6):657–665PubMed
42.
go back to reference Riaz N, Warriach RA (2010) Quality of life in patients with obturator prostheses. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 22:121–125PubMed Riaz N, Warriach RA (2010) Quality of life in patients with obturator prostheses. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 22:121–125PubMed
47.
go back to reference Costa H, Zenha H, Sequeira H, Coelho G, Gomes N, Pinto C, Martins J, Santos D, Andresen C (2015) Microsurgical reconstruction of the maxilla–algorithm and concepts. Br J Plast Surg 68:89–104 Costa H, Zenha H, Sequeira H, Coelho G, Gomes N, Pinto C, Martins J, Santos D, Andresen C (2015) Microsurgical reconstruction of the maxilla–algorithm and concepts. Br J Plast Surg 68:89–104
51.
go back to reference Pompa G, Brauner E, Jamshir S, De Angelis F, Giardino R, Di Carlo S (2017) Quality of life in patients rehabilitated with palatal obturator without reconstruction versus fixed implant-prosthesis after reconstruction of maxillectomy defects. J Int Dent Med Res 10:1–8 Pompa G, Brauner E, Jamshir S, De Angelis F, Giardino R, Di Carlo S (2017) Quality of life in patients rehabilitated with palatal obturator without reconstruction versus fixed implant-prosthesis after reconstruction of maxillectomy defects. J Int Dent Med Res 10:1–8
53.
go back to reference Brauner E, Valentini V, Jamshir S, Guarino G, Battisti A, Fadda MT, Pompa G (2016) Retrospective review of 78 rehabilitated head and neck postoncological patients: a new classification method. Minerva Stomatol 65:17–38PubMed Brauner E, Valentini V, Jamshir S, Guarino G, Battisti A, Fadda MT, Pompa G (2016) Retrospective review of 78 rehabilitated head and neck postoncological patients: a new classification method. Minerva Stomatol 65:17–38PubMed
55.
go back to reference Martín-Ares M, Barona-Dorado C, Guisado-Moya B, Martínez-Rodríguez N, Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J, Martínez-González JM (2015) Prosthetic hygiene and functional efficacy in completely edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life during a 5-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:1–6 Martín-Ares M, Barona-Dorado C, Guisado-Moya B, Martínez-Rodríguez N, Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J, Martínez-González JM (2015) Prosthetic hygiene and functional efficacy in completely edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life during a 5-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:1–6
56.
go back to reference Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, Savard A, Feine JS (2003) Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 16(4):390–396PubMed Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, Savard A, Feine JS (2003) Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 16(4):390–396PubMed
64.
go back to reference Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Branemark I, McAlpine JA (2007) A protocol for maxillary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont 20:521–531PubMed Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Branemark I, McAlpine JA (2007) A protocol for maxillary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont 20:521–531PubMed
66.
go back to reference Weischer T, Schettler D, Mohr C (1997) Titanium implants in the zygoma as retaining elements after hemimaxillectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:211–214PubMed Weischer T, Schettler D, Mohr C (1997) Titanium implants in the zygoma as retaining elements after hemimaxillectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:211–214PubMed
67.
go back to reference Leles CR, Leles JL, de Paula Souza C, Martins RR, Mendonc EF (2010) Implant-supported obturator overdenture for extensive maxillary resection patient: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 19:240–244CrossRefPubMed Leles CR, Leles JL, de Paula Souza C, Martins RR, Mendonc EF (2010) Implant-supported obturator overdenture for extensive maxillary resection patient: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 19:240–244CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Rogers SN, Lowe D, Humphris G (2000) Distinct patient groups in oral cancer: a prospective study of perceived health status following primary surgery. Oral Oncol 36:529–538CrossRefPubMed Rogers SN, Lowe D, Humphris G (2000) Distinct patient groups in oral cancer: a prospective study of perceived health status following primary surgery. Oral Oncol 36:529–538CrossRefPubMed
71.
go back to reference Allison PJ, Locker D, Feine JS (1997) Quality of life: a dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med 45:221–230CrossRefPubMed Allison PJ, Locker D, Feine JS (1997) Quality of life: a dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med 45:221–230CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prosthetic versus surgical rehabilitation in patients with maxillary defect regarding the quality of life: systematic review
Authors
M. Y. Sharaf
S. I. Ibrahim
A. E. Eskander
A. F. Shaker
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0679-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue