Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Review

A right to confidentiality or a duty to disclose? Ethical guidance for conducting prevention research with children and adolescents

Authors: Ioana E. Hiriscau, Nicola Stingelin-Giles, Christina Stadler, Klaus Schmeck, Stella Reiter-Theil

Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Conducting prevention research with children and adolescents raises ethical challenges especially regarding confidentiality. Research with children and adolescents often applies methodologies which aims at the disclosure of sensitive information about practices that impact on adolescent mental and physical health such as sexual activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, illegal drug use, self-damaging and suicidal behaviour (ideation and attempts). The scope of the article is to review normative documents that cover topics relevant for confidentiality when conducting research with children and adolescents. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed to identify relevant international and European guidelines and codes of ethics that cover health, behavioural and social science research. Additionally, the European Research Ethics website was consulted for double check. However, none of the documents aimed at biomedical, behavioural or social research offers concrete support in resolving practical research ethics problems regarding confidentiality. The codes show a lack of clarity in any circumstances in which the researcher might have an obligation to breach confidentiality by disclosing sensitive information. Only little information is given on what kind of disclosed information, if disclosed, might justify breaching confidentiality. The findings prove a need for normative documents to address the ethical questions regarding confidentiality arising in research practice explicitly and specifically. Moreover, further forms of ethical guidance should be developed to support ethical research with children and adolescents.
Footnotes
1
Although it is common to define children by reference to age and the level of children’s biological and psychological development, definition of children is more complex. According to World Health Organization (WHO), the term “children” is used to cover all age groups from birth to age 19, strict terminology refers to “newborns” (1–28 days), “infants” (up to 12 months), “children” (from 1 up to 10 years), “adolescents” (10–19 years). Other organizations (e.g. UNICEF) may use different age groupings (UNICEF considers children as being up to 18 years old). According to the US federal regulations for research, “children are persons who have not attained the legal age for consent to treatments or procedures involved in the research, under the applicable law of the jurisdiction in which the research will be conducted”. Under this definition, not all adolescents who are under the legal age of majority are defined as children.
.
 
2
Given the importance of ethics for the conduct of research, various professional associations have adopted specific codes, guidelines, and policies for their research. Normative documents have a status lying between ethics (theory) and law; thus, they are sometimes called “soft law”.
 
3
In the USA, the state laws have recognized the right of minors with a certain status, such as “mature” or “emancipated” minors (including those who are married or in military service) to consent to their own care. Other minors authorized to consent may include those who are parents or are living independently of their own parents. The definition of “children” in the federal regulations (which includes adolescents who are minors) specifically references state laws on treatment for health care and the age at which an individual can independently consent under these laws to specific treatment or care. Relevant state laws include those addressing age of majority, emancipation status, age to consent for general medical care, and care of minors for specific conditions such as sexually transmitted diseases (STD) and substance use; few states have laws addressing participation of adolescents in research.
 
4
The aim of the website is to give researchers access to and information on the guidelines, ethics codes and laws, at European and international level that regulate the research process http://​www.​ethicsweb.​eu.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wasserman D, Carli V, Wasserman C, Apter A, Balazs J, Bobes J, Bracale R, Brunner R, Bursztein-Lipsicas C, Corcoran P, Cosman D, Durkee T, Feldman D, Gadoros J, Guillemin F, Haring C, Kahn JP, Kaess M, Keely H, Dragan M, Nemes B, Postuvan V, Reiter-Theil S, Resch F, Saiz P, Sarchiapone M, Sisask M, Varnik A, Hoven CW (2010) Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe (SEYLE): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 10:192. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-192 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wasserman D, Carli V, Wasserman C, Apter A, Balazs J, Bobes J, Bracale R, Brunner R, Bursztein-Lipsicas C, Corcoran P, Cosman D, Durkee T, Feldman D, Gadoros J, Guillemin F, Haring C, Kahn JP, Kaess M, Keely H, Dragan M, Nemes B, Postuvan V, Reiter-Theil S, Resch F, Saiz P, Sarchiapone M, Sisask M, Varnik A, Hoven CW (2010) Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe (SEYLE): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 10:192. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2458-10-192 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carli V, Hadlaczky G, Wasserman C, Stingelin-Giles N, Reiter-Theil S, Wasserman D (2011) Maintaining confidentiality in prospective studies: anonymous repeated measurements via email (ARME) procedure. J Med Ethics 38:127–129. doi:10.1136/jme.2011.044552 PubMedCrossRef Carli V, Hadlaczky G, Wasserman C, Stingelin-Giles N, Reiter-Theil S, Wasserman D (2011) Maintaining confidentiality in prospective studies: anonymous repeated measurements via email (ARME) procedure. J Med Ethics 38:127–129. doi:10.​1136/​jme.​2011.​044552 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hazen E, Schlozman S, Beresin E (2008) Adolescent psychological development: a review. Pediatr Rev 29:161–167PubMedCrossRef Hazen E, Schlozman S, Beresin E (2008) Adolescent psychological development: a review. Pediatr Rev 29:161–167PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smetana JG, Campione-Barr N, Metzger A (2006) Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annu Rev Psychol 57:255–284PubMedCrossRef Smetana JG, Campione-Barr N, Metzger A (2006) Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annu Rev Psychol 57:255–284PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fischoff B (1992) Risk taking: a developmental perspective. In: Yates JF (ed) Risk-taking behavior. Wiley, Chichester, pp 133–162 Fischoff B (1992) Risk taking: a developmental perspective. In: Yates JF (ed) Risk-taking behavior. Wiley, Chichester, pp 133–162
7.
8.
9.
go back to reference Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M, Graef R (1980) Mood variability and the psychosocial adjustment of adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 9(6):469–490PubMedCrossRef Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M, Graef R (1980) Mood variability and the psychosocial adjustment of adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 9(6):469–490PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Viner R, Booy R (2005) ABC of adolescence: epidemiology of health and illness. Br Med J 330:411–414CrossRef Viner R, Booy R (2005) ABC of adolescence: epidemiology of health and illness. Br Med J 330:411–414CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berlan ED, Bravender T (2009) Confidentiality, consent, and caring for adolescent patient. Curr Opin Pediatr 21(4):450–456PubMedCrossRef Berlan ED, Bravender T (2009) Confidentiality, consent, and caring for adolescent patient. Curr Opin Pediatr 21(4):450–456PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sanci LA, Sawer SM, Kang MS, Haller DM, Patton GC (2005) Confidential health care for adolescents: reconciling clinical evidence with family values. Med J Aust 183(8):410–414PubMed Sanci LA, Sawer SM, Kang MS, Haller DM, Patton GC (2005) Confidential health care for adolescents: reconciling clinical evidence with family values. Med J Aust 183(8):410–414PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mitchell CW, Disque JG, Robertson P (2002) When parents want to know: responding to parental demands for confidential information. Prof Sch Couns 6:156–161 Mitchell CW, Disque JG, Robertson P (2002) When parents want to know: responding to parental demands for confidential information. Prof Sch Couns 6:156–161
15.
go back to reference Report of the Committee on Privacy and Related Matters, Chairman David Calcutt QC (1990) Cmnd. 1102, London: HMSO Report of the Committee on Privacy and Related Matters, Chairman David Calcutt QC (1990) Cmnd. 1102, London: HMSO
16.
go back to reference Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University, New York and Oxford Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University, New York and Oxford
18.
go back to reference Boruch RF, Cecil JS (1979) Assuring the confidentiality of social research data. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia Boruch RF, Cecil JS (1979) Assuring the confidentiality of social research data. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
19.
go back to reference Powell MA, Fitzgerald RM, Taylor N, Graham A (2012) International literature review: ethical issues in undertaking research with children and young people, for the childwatch International Research Network, Southern Cross University, Centre for Children and Young People, Lismore NSW and University of Otago, Centre for Research on Children and Families, Dunedin, NZ Powell MA, Fitzgerald RM, Taylor N, Graham A (2012) International literature review: ethical issues in undertaking research with children and young people, for the childwatch International Research Network, Southern Cross University, Centre for Children and Young People, Lismore NSW and University of Otago, Centre for Research on Children and Families, Dunedin, NZ
20.
go back to reference Larcher V (2005) ABC of Adolescence. Consent, competence and confidentiality. Br Med J 330(7487):353–356CrossRef Larcher V (2005) ABC of Adolescence. Consent, competence and confidentiality. Br Med J 330(7487):353–356CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rae WA, Sullivan JR, Razo NP, George CA, Ramirez E (2002) Adolescent health risk behavior. When do pediatric psychologists break confidentiality? J Pediatr Psychol 27(6):541–549PubMedCrossRef Rae WA, Sullivan JR, Razo NP, George CA, Ramirez E (2002) Adolescent health risk behavior. When do pediatric psychologists break confidentiality? J Pediatr Psychol 27(6):541–549PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stingelin-Giles N (2011) The place of informed consent and community assent in international public health interventions. Dissertation, University of Basel Stingelin-Giles N (2011) The place of informed consent and community assent in international public health interventions. Dissertation, University of Basel
23.
go back to reference Society for adolescent medicine (2004) Confidential health care for adolescents: position paper of the society for adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health 35:160–167CrossRef Society for adolescent medicine (2004) Confidential health care for adolescents: position paper of the society for adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health 35:160–167CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lothen-Kline C, Howard DE, Hamburger EK, Worrell KD, Boekeloo BO (2003) Truth and consequences: ethics, confidentiality, and disclosure in adolescent longitudinal prevention research. J Adolesc Health 33(5):385–394PubMedCrossRef Lothen-Kline C, Howard DE, Hamburger EK, Worrell KD, Boekeloo BO (2003) Truth and consequences: ethics, confidentiality, and disclosure in adolescent longitudinal prevention research. J Adolesc Health 33(5):385–394PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greig A, Taylor J, Mackay T (2007) Doing research with children. Sage Publications, London Greig A, Taylor J, Mackay T (2007) Doing research with children. Sage Publications, London
27.
go back to reference Peart N, Foley M, Henaghan M (2003) Children as research participants. In: Dawson J, Paert N (eds) The law of research. A guide. Dunedin, University of Otago Press, pp 269–284 Peart N, Foley M, Henaghan M (2003) Children as research participants. In: Dawson J, Paert N (eds) The law of research. A guide. Dunedin, University of Otago Press, pp 269–284
28.
go back to reference Gill D (2003) Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialist in Paediatrics: crawley FP (Belgium), LoGiudice M (Italy), Grosek S (Slovenia), Kurz R (Austria), De Lourdes Levy M (Portugal), Mjones S (Sweden), Nicolopoulos D (Greece), Rubino A (Italy), Sauer PJJ (Netherlands), Siimes M (Finland), Weinding M (UK), Zach M (Austria), Chambers TL (UK). Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participants. Eur J Pediatr 162:455–458PubMedCrossRef Gill D (2003) Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialist in Paediatrics: crawley FP (Belgium), LoGiudice M (Italy), Grosek S (Slovenia), Kurz R (Austria), De Lourdes Levy M (Portugal), Mjones S (Sweden), Nicolopoulos D (Greece), Rubino A (Italy), Sauer PJJ (Netherlands), Siimes M (Finland), Weinding M (UK), Zach M (Austria), Chambers TL (UK). Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participants. Eur J Pediatr 162:455–458PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the ethics working group of the confederation of European specialists in paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162(9):629–633PubMedCrossRef De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the ethics working group of the confederation of European specialists in paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162(9):629–633PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gans JE, Brindis CD (1995) Choice of research setting in understanding adolescent health problems. J Adolesc Health 17:306–313PubMedCrossRef Gans JE, Brindis CD (1995) Choice of research setting in understanding adolescent health problems. J Adolesc Health 17:306–313PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Koch HG, Reiter-Theil S, Helmchen H (eds) (1996) Informed consent in psychiatry. European perspectives of ethics, law and clinical practice. Nomos, Baden–Baden Koch HG, Reiter-Theil S, Helmchen H (eds) (1996) Informed consent in psychiatry. European perspectives of ethics, law and clinical practice. Nomos, Baden–Baden
33.
go back to reference The Nuremberg Code (1998). In: Tröhler U, Reiter-Theil S (eds) (in collaboration with E Herych) Ethics codes in medicine. Foundations and achievements of codification since 1947, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 353–354 The Nuremberg Code (1998). In: Tröhler U, Reiter-Theil S (eds) (in collaboration with E Herych) Ethics codes in medicine. Foundations and achievements of codification since 1947, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 353–354
36.
go back to reference Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health: Ethics Advisory Committee (2000) Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child 82:177–182 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health: Ethics Advisory Committee (2000) Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child 82:177–182
42.
go back to reference Morrow V, Richards MPM (1996) The ethics of social research with children: an overview. Child Soc 10:90–105CrossRef Morrow V, Richards MPM (1996) The ethics of social research with children: an overview. Child Soc 10:90–105CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Ford CA, English A (2002) Limiting confidentiality of adolescent health services. What are the risk? JAMA 288(6):752–753PubMedCrossRef Ford CA, English A (2002) Limiting confidentiality of adolescent health services. What are the risk? JAMA 288(6):752–753PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kemper A, Kölch M, Fangerau H, Fegert JM (2010) Ärztliche Schweigephlicht bei Kindeswohlgefärdung. Mehr Handlungssicherheit durch die neuen Kinderschutzgesetze? Ethik in der Medizin 22(1):33–47CrossRef Kemper A, Kölch M, Fangerau H, Fegert JM (2010) Ärztliche Schweigephlicht bei Kindeswohlgefärdung. Mehr Handlungssicherheit durch die neuen Kinderschutzgesetze? Ethik in der Medizin 22(1):33–47CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Kobocow B, McGuire JM, Blau BI (1983) The influence of confidentiality conditions on self-disclosure of early adolescents. Prof Psychol Res Pract 14(4):435–443CrossRef Kobocow B, McGuire JM, Blau BI (1983) The influence of confidentiality conditions on self-disclosure of early adolescents. Prof Psychol Res Pract 14(4):435–443CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Shaw C, Brady L-M, Davey C (2011) Guideline for research with children and young people. National Children’s Bureau Research Centre, London Shaw C, Brady L-M, Davey C (2011) Guideline for research with children and young people. National Children’s Bureau Research Centre, London
47.
go back to reference Stiles GP, Petrila J (2011) Research and confidentiality: legal issues and risk management strategies. Psychol Public Policy Law 17(3):333–356CrossRef Stiles GP, Petrila J (2011) Research and confidentiality: legal issues and risk management strategies. Psychol Public Policy Law 17(3):333–356CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A right to confidentiality or a duty to disclose? Ethical guidance for conducting prevention research with children and adolescents
Authors
Ioana E. Hiriscau
Nicola Stingelin-Giles
Christina Stadler
Klaus Schmeck
Stella Reiter-Theil
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1018-8827
Electronic ISSN: 1435-165X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-014-0526-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 6/2014 Go to the issue