Top

Published in:

01-08-2020 | Original Article

Quick bonding using a universal adhesive

Authors: Mohammed H. Ahmed, Kumiko Yoshihara, Benjamin Mercelis, Kirsten Van Landuyt, Marleen Peumans, Bart Van Meerbeek

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 8/2020

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to measure the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a new universal adhesive (UA) bonded to dentin following a quick bonding mode.

Materials and methods

The experimental UA ‘SKB-100,’ now commercialized as Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (‘C-UBq’; Kuraray Noritake), was investigated, with Scotchbond Universal (‘SBU’; 3M Oral Care) and the two-step self-etch (SE) adhesive Clearfil SE Bond 2 (‘C-SE2’; Kuraray Noritake) serving as references. The adhesives were employed separately in etch&rinse (E&R) and SE modes on each tooth half following a split-tooth design and following their respective instructions for use, except for C-UBq that besides the manufacturer’s instructed quick bonding mode was also applied and left untouched for 20 s prior to light curing (‘C-UBq_20s’) and for C-SE2 that was also applied in the E&R mode. μTBS of half of the specimens was measured upon 1 week (1w), with the other half tested after 6-month (6m) storage in distilled water at 37 °C. Data were statistically analyzed using linear mixed-effects modeling and three-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). The adhesive–dentin interfaces were ultrastructurally characterized by TEM.

Results

C-UBq revealed a significantly lower μTBS than C-SE2. The highest μTBS was recorded for C-UBq_20s_1w and C-SE2_1w, both when applied in E&R mode. However, μTBS of C-UBq_20s significantly decreased upon aging in both modes. C-SE2 presented the significantly highest ‘aged’ μTBS.

Conclusion

C-UBq applied in the quick bonding mode did not underperform to the UAs applied for 20 s. Superior bonding effectiveness was achieved by C-SE2 in SE and E&R bonding modes.

Clinical relevance

Extended application time of C-UBq improved solely its immediate but not aged bonding effectiveness.

Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U (2014) Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 42(7):800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012 CrossRefPubMed

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 CrossRefPubMed

Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2011) State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016 CrossRefPubMed

Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel–dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21(10):895–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001 CrossRefPubMed

Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28(26):3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 CrossRefPubMed

Van Meerbeek B, Frankenberger R (2016) Editorial: The “etch-and-rinse” and “self-etch” camps. J Adhes Dent 18(6):463. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37487 CrossRefPubMed

Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J (2012) Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 40(6):475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012 CrossRefPubMed

Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B (2014) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater 30(10):1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007 CrossRefPubMed

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84(2):118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Rueggeberg FA, Agee KA, Carrilho M, Donnelly A, Garcia-Godoy F (2007) From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent 20(1):7–20PubMed

11.

Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2013) Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine cathepsins. Dent Mater 29(1):116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Armstrong S, Breschi L, Ozcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) approach. Dent Mater 33(2):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Bedran-Russo AKB, Pereira PNR, Duarte WR, Drummond JL, Yamauchi M (2007) Application of crosslinkers to dentin collagen enhances the ultimate tensile strength. J Biomed Mater Res B 80b(1):268–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30593 CrossRef

14.

Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2011) Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res 90(8):953–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510391799 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Van Landuyt K, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2008) The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 24(10):1412–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.018 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Matsumoto T, Minagi S, Osaka A, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B (2012) HEMA inhibits interfacial nano-layering of the functional monomer MDP. J Dent Res 91(11):1060–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512460396 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Van Landuyt KL, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Peumans M, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2009) Optimization of the concentration of photo-initiator in a one-step self-etch adhesive. Dent Mater 25(8):982–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.008 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Kuroboshi M, Hayakawa S, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B (2015) Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance. Dent Mater 31(12):1493–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.019 CrossRefPubMed

19.

GC Europe (2018) G-Premio Bond leaflets. https://cdn.gceurope.com/v1/PID/gpremiobond/leaflet/LFL_G-Premio_BOND_en.pdf. Accessed 01 Dec 2018

20.

Huang XQ, Pucci CR, Luo T, Breschi L, Pashley DH, Niu LN, Tay FR (2017) No-waiting dentine self-etch concept-Merit or hype. J Dent 62:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.007 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kuraray Noritake (2018) CLEARFIL Universal Bond quick brochure. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/clearfil-universal-bond-quick-new-cap-brochure-sm.pdf. Accessed 01 Nov 2018

22.

Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater J 26(5):694–699. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.694 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lopes A (1995) Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A 29(9):1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290911 CrossRef

24.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke E, Eick J, Robinson S (1998) A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 77(1):50–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770010501 CrossRefPubMed

25.

De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2012) Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res 91(4):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431251 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2015) Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine—old wine in new bottles? J Dent 43(5):525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol ILS, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2013) Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer—a review. Dent Mater 29(10):999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Montes MA, de Goes MF, da Cunha MR, Soares AB (2001) A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 29(6):435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00037-9 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ahmed MH, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Yoshihara K, Van Meerbeek B (2019) Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer? J Adhes Dent 21(2):117–132. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a42304 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Ermis RB, Ugurlu M, Ahmed MH, Van Meerbeek B (2019) Universal adhesives benefit from an extra hydrophobic adhesive layer when light cured beforehand. J Adhes Dent 21(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a42344 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kuraray Noritake (2014) Clearfil SE Bond 2; instructions for use. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/clearfil_se_bond_2_bottles_ifu.pdf. Accessed 01 April 2014

32.

Minamino T, Mine A, Shintani A, Higashi M, Kawaguchi-Uemura A, Kabetani T, Hagino R, Imai D, Tajiri Y, Matsumoto M, Yatani H (2017) Advanced statistical analyses to reduce inconsistency of bond strength data. J Dent Res 96(12):1400–1405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517725691 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2008) Effect of double-application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one-step self-etch systems in enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 33(5):564–570. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-145 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Taschner M, Kummerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2014) Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 39(4):416–426. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-168-L CrossRefPubMed

35.

Sartori N, Peruchi LD, Guimaraes JC, Silva SB, Monteiro S, Baratieri LN, Belli R (2013) Clinical effectiveness of a hydrophobic coating used in conjunction with a one-step self-etch adhesive: an 18-month evaluation. Oper Dent 38(3):249–257. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-014-C CrossRefPubMed

36.

Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH, Perdigao J (2014) Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. J Dent 42(5):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.013 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 39(5):489–499. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-Lr CrossRefPubMed

38.

Reis A, Albuquerque M, Peyoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JRDO, Grande RHM, Klein-Junior CA, Baumhardt-Neto R, Loguercio AD (2008) Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent 36(5):309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.018 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Perdigao J, Ceballos L, Giraldez I, Baracco B, Fuentes MV (2019) Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x

40.

Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G (1996) The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9(4):167–173PubMed

41.

Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1993) Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72(10):1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720101401 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69(6):1240–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64(6):658–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-J CrossRefPubMed

44.

Wang Y, Spencer P, Yao X, Brenda B (2007) Effect of solvent content on resin hybridization in wet dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res A 82(4):975–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31232 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83(6):454–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Mine A, Nakamura M, Minagi S, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 6(9):3573–3582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.024 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Sai K, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2018) Influence of application time and etching mode of universal adhesives on enamel adhesion. J Adhes Dent 20(1):65–77. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39913 CrossRefPubMed

48.

Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B (2018) Etching efficacy of self-etching functional monomers. J Dent Res 97(9):1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518763606 CrossRefPubMed

49.

Kuraray Noritake (2017) CLEARFIL Universal Bond quick; safety data sheet. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/sds/chairside/usa/clearfil-universal-bond-quick-sds-usa.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2017

Title: Quick bonding using a universal adhesive
Authors: Mohammed H. Ahmed
Kumiko Yoshihara
Benjamin Mercelis
Kirsten Van Landuyt
Marleen Peumans
Bart Van Meerbeek
Publication date: 01-08-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Quick bonding using a universal adhesive

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

MRI of the inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve—anatomical variation and morphometric benchmark values of nerve diameters in healthy subjects

In vitro and in silico evaluations of resin-based dental restorative material toxicity

Minimally invasive removal of tooth-colored restorations: evaluation of a novel handpiece using the fluorescence-aided identification technique (FIT)

Is it safe to drive after oral surgery?

Breaking the rules: tooth whitening by means of a reducing agent

Effects of argon plasma treatment on the osteoconductivity of bone grafting materials