Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2011

01-04-2011 | Original Article

Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings

Authors: Kathrin Lampe Bless, Beatrice Sener, Jürg Dual, Thomas Attin, Patrick R. Schmidlin

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Some laboratory studies have evaluated the oscillation mode of ultrasonic scalers. None of them recorded its influence on calculus removal and quantified dental hard tissue loss. This study aimed to compare the performance of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings in vitro in relation to the tip oscillation activity. The oscillation activity of the straight Slimline® insert in the Cavitron® ultrasonic scaling device was analyzed at five different power settings with the help of two laser vibrometers. The performance of this instrument was tested on 60 roots of human single-rooted teeth. Twelve roots each were randomly assigned to be instrumented at a given power setting. Every root was instrumented for 120 s at a standardized instrumentation force of 0.1 ± 0.05 N. In addition, another 30 periodontally involved roots with subgingival calculus were instrumented accordingly to assess the calculus removal potential. The surface characteristics after instrumentation were analyzed under scanning electron microscope. The instrumentation at minimum power setting resulted in an mean increase of the root surface roughness of 0.18 ± 0.28 compared to 0.51 ± 0.48 at maximum power setting (P = 0.0327). The loss of dental hard tissue amounted to 11.37 ± 3.64 at minimum compared to 23.37 ± 15.76 at maximum power (P = 0.0010). The higher the power setting, the more calculus was removed. The values of the latter ranged between 4.04 ± 1.87 and 11.26 ± 4.66 mm2 of cleaned dentin surface area (P = 0.0065). At lower power settings, a more favorable relation between cleaning ability, loss of dentine, and surface roughness was found.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walmsley A, Laird W, Williams A (1984) A model system to demonstrate the role of cavitational activity in ultrasonic scaling. J Dent Res 63:1162–1165PubMedCrossRef Walmsley A, Laird W, Williams A (1984) A model system to demonstrate the role of cavitational activity in ultrasonic scaling. J Dent Res 63:1162–1165PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Khambay B, Walmsley A (1999) Acoustic microstreaming: detection and measurement around ultrasonic scalers. J Periodontol 70:626–631PubMedCrossRef Khambay B, Walmsley A (1999) Acoustic microstreaming: detection and measurement around ultrasonic scalers. J Periodontol 70:626–631PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Walmsley A, Laird W, Williams A (1986) Displacement amplitude as a measure of the acoustic output of ultrasonic scalers. Dent Mater 2:97–100PubMedCrossRef Walmsley A, Laird W, Williams A (1986) Displacement amplitude as a measure of the acoustic output of ultrasonic scalers. Dent Mater 2:97–100PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Walmsley A, Laird W, Walsh TF (1986) Inherent variability of the performance of the ultrasonic descaler. J Dent 14:121–125PubMedCrossRef Walmsley A, Laird W, Walsh TF (1986) Inherent variability of the performance of the ultrasonic descaler. J Dent 14:121–125PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A (2002) Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry. J Dent 30:147–151PubMedCrossRef Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A (2002) Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry. J Dent 30:147–151PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lea S, Felver B, Landini G, Walmsley A (2009) Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations. J Clin Periodontol 36:44–50PubMedCrossRef Lea S, Felver B, Landini G, Walmsley A (2009) Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations. J Clin Periodontol 36:44–50PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lea S, Felver B, Landini G, Walmsley A (2009) Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects. J Dent Res 88:229–234PubMed Lea S, Felver B, Landini G, Walmsley A (2009) Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects. J Dent Res 88:229–234PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A (2006) The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude. J Clin Periodontol 33:37–41PubMedCrossRef Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A (2006) The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude. J Clin Periodontol 33:37–41PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Walmsley A, Lea S, Landini G, Moses A (2008) Advances in power driven pocket/root instrumentation. J Clin Periodontol 25:22–28CrossRef Walmsley A, Lea S, Landini G, Moses A (2008) Advances in power driven pocket/root instrumentation. J Clin Periodontol 25:22–28CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tunkel J, Heinecke A, Flemmig T (2002) A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):72–81, discussion 90–91PubMedCrossRef Tunkel J, Heinecke A, Flemmig T (2002) A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):72–81, discussion 90–91PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Drisko C (1993) Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers. Curr Opin Periodontol 1:78–88 Drisko C (1993) Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers. Curr Opin Periodontol 1:78–88
12.
go back to reference Dragoo MR (1992) A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 12:310–323 Dragoo MR (1992) A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 12:310–323
13.
go back to reference Flemmig TF, Petersilka G, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B (1998) The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 25:158–163PubMedCrossRef Flemmig TF, Petersilka G, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B (1998) The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 25:158–163PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Flemmig TF, Petersilka G, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B (1998) Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. J Periodontol 69:547–553PubMed Flemmig TF, Petersilka G, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B (1998) Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. J Periodontol 69:547–553PubMed
15.
go back to reference Buddecke E (1981) Biochemische grundlagen der zahnmedizin. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 5–17 Buddecke E (1981) Biochemische grundlagen der zahnmedizin. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 5–17
16.
go back to reference Gutjahr EM (1997) Vergleich handelsüblicher Zahnbürsten bezüglich Borstenendmorphologie, Gingivaverletzungspotential, Zahnflächenkontaktvermögen und Abrasivität in-vitro. Dissertation, University of Zurich Gutjahr EM (1997) Vergleich handelsüblicher Zahnbürsten bezüglich Borstenendmorphologie, Gingivaverletzungspotential, Zahnflächenkontaktvermögen und Abrasivität in-vitro. Dissertation, University of Zurich
17.
go back to reference Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A (2003) Ultrasonic scaler tip performance under various load conditions. J Clin Periodontol 30:876–881PubMedCrossRef Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A (2003) Ultrasonic scaler tip performance under various load conditions. J Clin Periodontol 30:876–881PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Imfeld T, Lutz F (1995) The subjective evaluation of oral health in 40- to 69-year-old subjects. A representative survey of 600 persons in German- and French-speaking Switzerland. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 105:1272–1283PubMed Imfeld T, Lutz F (1995) The subjective evaluation of oral health in 40- to 69-year-old subjects. A representative survey of 600 persons in German- and French-speaking Switzerland. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 105:1272–1283PubMed
19.
go back to reference Nakib N, Bissada NF, Simmelink J, Goldstine S (1982) Endotoxin penetration into root cementum of periodontally healthy and diseased human teeth. J Periodontol 53:368–378PubMed Nakib N, Bissada NF, Simmelink J, Goldstine S (1982) Endotoxin penetration into root cementum of periodontally healthy and diseased human teeth. J Periodontol 53:368–378PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nyman S, Sarhed G, Ericsson I, Gottlow J, Karring T (1986) Role of “diseased” root cementum in healing following treatment of periodontal disease. An experimental study in the dog. J Periodontal Res 21:496–503PubMedCrossRef Nyman S, Sarhed G, Ericsson I, Gottlow J, Karring T (1986) Role of “diseased” root cementum in healing following treatment of periodontal disease. An experimental study in the dog. J Periodontal Res 21:496–503PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ritz L, Hefti A, Rateitschak K (1991) An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. J Clin Periodontol 18:643–647PubMedCrossRef Ritz L, Hefti A, Rateitschak K (1991) An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. J Clin Periodontol 18:643–647PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hirschfeld L (1952) Subgingival curettage in periodontal treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 44:301–314PubMed Hirschfeld L (1952) Subgingival curettage in periodontal treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 44:301–314PubMed
23.
go back to reference Oberholzer R, Rateitschak K (1996) Root cleaning or root smoothing. An in vivo study. J Clin Periodontol 23:326–330PubMedCrossRef Oberholzer R, Rateitschak K (1996) Root cleaning or root smoothing. An in vivo study. J Clin Periodontol 23:326–330PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Leknes KN, Lie T, Wikesjo U, Bogle G, Selvig KA (1994) Influence of tooth instrumentation roughness on subgingival microbial colonization. J Periodontol 65:303–308PubMed Leknes KN, Lie T, Wikesjo U, Bogle G, Selvig KA (1994) Influence of tooth instrumentation roughness on subgingival microbial colonization. J Periodontol 65:303–308PubMed
25.
go back to reference Schmidlin PR, Beuchat M, Busslinger A, Lehmann B, Lutz F (2001) Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation. J Clin Periodontol 28:1058–1066PubMedCrossRef Schmidlin PR, Beuchat M, Busslinger A, Lehmann B, Lutz F (2001) Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation. J Clin Periodontol 28:1058–1066PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Leal PC, Gimenes-Sakima PP, Marcantonio E Jr (2998) Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo. Clin Oral Investig 12:143–150CrossRef Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Leal PC, Gimenes-Sakima PP, Marcantonio E Jr (2998) Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo. Clin Oral Investig 12:143–150CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Busslinger A, Lampe K, Beuchat M, Lehmann B (2001) A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. J Clin Periodontol 28:642–649PubMedCrossRef Busslinger A, Lampe K, Beuchat M, Lehmann B (2001) A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. J Clin Periodontol 28:642–649PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings
Authors
Kathrin Lampe Bless
Beatrice Sener
Jürg Dual
Thomas Attin
Patrick R. Schmidlin
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0379-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2011 Go to the issue