Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2011

01-04-2011 | Original Article

Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study

Author: Kristina Hellén-Halme

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of two different tube voltages on clinicians’ ability to diagnose approximal carious lesions in digital radiographs. One hundred extracted teeth were radiographed twice at two voltage settings, 60 and 70 kV, using a standardized procedure. Seven observers evaluated the radiographs on a standard color monitor pre-calibrated according to DICOM part 14. Evaluations were made at ambient light levels below 50 lx. All observations were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves. A histological examination of the teeth served as the criterion standard. A paired t test compared the effects of the two voltages. The significance level was set to p < 0.05. Weighted kappa statistics estimated intra-observer agreement. No significant difference in accuracy of approximal carious lesion diagnosis was found between the two voltage settings. But five observers rated dentin lesions on radiographs exposed at 70 kV better than on radiographs exposed at 60 kV. Intra-observer agreement differed from fair to moderate. There was no significant difference in accuracy of approximal carious lesion diagnosis between digital radiographs exposed with 60 or 70 kV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hellén-Halme K, Petersson A, Nilsson M (2008) Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:380–384PubMedCrossRef Hellén-Halme K, Petersson A, Nilsson M (2008) Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:380–384PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cederberg RA, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Shulman JD (1998) Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:293–297PubMedCrossRef Cederberg RA, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Shulman JD (1998) Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:293–297PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A (2007) Digital radiography in general dental practice. A field study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:249–255PubMedCrossRef Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A (2007) Digital radiography in general dental practice. A field study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:249–255PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kutcher MJ, Kalathingal S, Ludlow JB, Abreu M Jr, Platin E (2006) The effect of lighting conditions on caries interpretation with a laptop computer in a clinical setting. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102:537–543PubMedCrossRef Kutcher MJ, Kalathingal S, Ludlow JB, Abreu M Jr, Platin E (2006) The effect of lighting conditions on caries interpretation with a laptop computer in a clinical setting. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102:537–543PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A (2009) Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs-standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A (2009) Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs-standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
7.
go back to reference Kullendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M (1996) Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:344–350PubMedCrossRef Kullendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M (1996) Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:344–350PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wenzel A (2006) A review of dentists’ use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:307–314PubMedCrossRef Wenzel A (2006) A review of dentists’ use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:307–314PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berkhout WER (2007) Implementation of digital dental radiography. User aspects, radiation dose and diagnostic effects. Thesis. Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam, the Netherlands Berkhout WER (2007) Implementation of digital dental radiography. User aspects, radiation dose and diagnostic effects. Thesis. Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam, the Netherlands
11.
go back to reference Svenson B, Gröndahl HG, Petersson A, Olving A (1985) Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds. Swed Dent J 9:37–43PubMed Svenson B, Gröndahl HG, Petersson A, Olving A (1985) Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds. Swed Dent J 9:37–43PubMed
12.
go back to reference Svenson B, Petersson A (1991) Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars. Swed Dent J 15:245–250PubMed Svenson B, Petersson A (1991) Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars. Swed Dent J 15:245–250PubMed
14.
go back to reference Poludniowski GG, Evans PM (2007) Calculation of X-ray spectra emerging from an X-ray tube. Part I. Electron penetration characteristics in X-ray targets. Med Phys 34:2164–2174PubMedCrossRef Poludniowski GG, Evans PM (2007) Calculation of X-ray spectra emerging from an X-ray tube. Part I. Electron penetration characteristics in X-ray targets. Med Phys 34:2164–2174PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Poludniowski GG (2007) Calculation of X-ray spectra emerging from an X-ray tube. Part II. X-ray production and filtration in X-ray targets. Med Phys 34:2175–2186PubMedCrossRef Poludniowski GG (2007) Calculation of X-ray spectra emerging from an X-ray tube. Part II. X-ray production and filtration in X-ray targets. Med Phys 34:2175–2186PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Barten PGJ (1999) Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. Knegsel: HV Press. Proefschrift Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1999. ISBN 90-90112613-9. NUGI 832 Barten PGJ (1999) Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. Knegsel: HV Press. Proefschrift Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1999. ISBN 90-90112613-9. NUGI 832
18.
go back to reference Wenzel A, Hintze H (1999) The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28:132–136PubMedCrossRef Wenzel A, Hintze H (1999) The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28:132–136PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hintze H, Wenzel A (2003) Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation. A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemisectioning and serial tooth sectioning. Caries Res 37:115–124PubMedCrossRef Hintze H, Wenzel A (2003) Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation. A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemisectioning and serial tooth sectioning. Caries Res 37:115–124PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London
22.
go back to reference Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kitagawa H, Farman AG (2004) Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:21–24PubMedCrossRef Kitagawa H, Farman AG (2004) Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:21–24PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kaeppler G, Dietz K, Herz K, Reinert S (2007) Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:506–513PubMedCrossRef Kaeppler G, Dietz K, Herz K, Reinert S (2007) Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:506–513PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference de Almeida SM, de Oliveira AE, Ferreira RI, Bóscolo FN (2003) Image quality in digital radiographic systems. Braz Dent J 14:136–141PubMedCrossRef de Almeida SM, de Oliveira AE, Ferreira RI, Bóscolo FN (2003) Image quality in digital radiographic systems. Braz Dent J 14:136–141PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hayakawa Y, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Kuroyanagi K, Rumack PM, Schick DB (1996) Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:71–75PubMed Hayakawa Y, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Kuroyanagi K, Rumack PM, Schick DB (1996) Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:71–75PubMed
28.
go back to reference Grondahl HG (1979) Radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of caries progression and observer performance. Swed Dent J Suppl 3:1–32PubMed Grondahl HG (1979) Radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of caries progression and observer performance. Swed Dent J Suppl 3:1–32PubMed
30.
go back to reference Swets JA, Pickett RM (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. Academic, New York, pp 60–80 Swets JA, Pickett RM (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. Academic, New York, pp 60–80
31.
go back to reference Hintze H, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A (2003) Influence of number of surfaces and observers on statistical power in a multiobserver ROC radiographic caries detection study. Caries Res 37:200–205PubMedCrossRef Hintze H, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A (2003) Influence of number of surfaces and observers on statistical power in a multiobserver ROC radiographic caries detection study. Caries Res 37:200–205PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study
Author
Kristina Hellén-Halme
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0383-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2011 Go to the issue