Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Brain Tumor | Original Article - Brain Tumors

Safety and accuracy of frameless electromagnetic-navigated (AXIEMTM)-guided brain lesion biopsies: a large single-unit study

Authors: Anastasios Giamouriadis, Duranka Perera, Afshan Safdar, Francesco Vergani, Ranjeev Bhangoo, Richard Gullan, Keyoumars Ashkan

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Brain biopsies are required to establish a definitive histological diagnosis for brain lesions that have been identified on imaging in order to guide further treatment for patients.

Objective

Various navigation systems are in use but little up to date evidence is available regarding the safety and accuracy of a frameless, electromagnetic technique to target brain lesions.

Methods

Data was collected retrospectively on all patients that had brain biopsies at our institution from 01/01/2010 to 31/12/2017. Operation notes, neuropathology reports, and clinical notes on electronic patient record were used to determine whether biopsy of adequate identifiable abnormal tissue was achieved, whether a definitive diagnosis was established, any adverse events occurred, and if a repeat biopsy was carried out.

Results

Three hundred seventy-one AxiEM (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA)-guided brain tumor biopsies were performed in this 8-year period. Three hundred forty-nine (94.07%) procedures provided definitive tissue diagnosis, 22 (5.93%) were non diagnostic; in 6 cases (1.62%), repeat biopsy was performed and adverse events which caused clinical compromise were observed in 4 patients (1.08%).

Conclusions

The AxiEM is a fast, effective, and safe frameless and pinless neuronavigational system. It offers a high degree of accuracy required for the establishment of a definitive diagnosis, permitting optimal further treatment, and thus improving patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amin DV, Lozanne K, Parry PV, Engh JA, Seelman K, Mintz A (2011) Image-guided frameless stereotactic needle biopsy in awake patients without the use of rigid head fixation. J Neurosurg 114:1414–1420CrossRef Amin DV, Lozanne K, Parry PV, Engh JA, Seelman K, Mintz A (2011) Image-guided frameless stereotactic needle biopsy in awake patients without the use of rigid head fixation. J Neurosurg 114:1414–1420CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bekelis K, Radwan TA, Desai A, Roberts DW (2012) Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy: feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety. J Neurosurg 116:1002–1006CrossRef Bekelis K, Radwan TA, Desai A, Roberts DW (2012) Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy: feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety. J Neurosurg 116:1002–1006CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Clark S, Sangra M, Hayhurst C (2008) The use of noninvasive electromagnetic neuronavigation for slit ventricle syndrome and complex hydrocephalus in a pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:430–434CrossRef Clark S, Sangra M, Hayhurst C (2008) The use of noninvasive electromagnetic neuronavigation for slit ventricle syndrome and complex hydrocephalus in a pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:430–434CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJJ, Vincent AJPE (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir 150:23CrossRef Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJJ, Vincent AJPE (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir 150:23CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dorward NL, Paleologos TS, Alberti O, Thomas DG (2002) The advantages of frameless stereotactic biopsy over frame-based biopsy. Br J Neurosurg 16:110–118CrossRef Dorward NL, Paleologos TS, Alberti O, Thomas DG (2002) The advantages of frameless stereotactic biopsy over frame-based biopsy. Br J Neurosurg 16:110–118CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Frati A, Pichierri A, Bastianello S, Raco A, Santoro A, Esposito V et al (2011) Frameless stereotactic cerebral biopsy: our experience in 296 cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 89:234–245CrossRef Frati A, Pichierri A, Bastianello S, Raco A, Santoro A, Esposito V et al (2011) Frameless stereotactic cerebral biopsy: our experience in 296 cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 89:234–245CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Georgiopoulos M, Ellul J, Chroni E, Constantoyannis C (2018) Efficacy, safety, and duration of a frameless fiducial-less brain biopsy versus frame-based stereotactic biopsy: a prospective randomized study. J Neurol Surg 79:31–38 Georgiopoulos M, Ellul J, Chroni E, Constantoyannis C (2018) Efficacy, safety, and duration of a frameless fiducial-less brain biopsy versus frame-based stereotactic biopsy: a prospective randomized study. J Neurol Surg 79:31–38
8.
go back to reference Harrison SE, Shooman D, Grundy PL (2012) A prospective study into the safety and efficacy of frameless, pinless electromagnetic image-guided biopsy of cerebral lesions: electromagnetic image-guided biopsy of cerebral lesions. Neurosurgery 70:29–33 Harrison SE, Shooman D, Grundy PL (2012) A prospective study into the safety and efficacy of frameless, pinless electromagnetic image-guided biopsy of cerebral lesions: electromagnetic image-guided biopsy of cerebral lesions. Neurosurgery 70:29–33
9.
go back to reference Lefranc M, Capel C, Pruvot-Occean A-S, Fichten A, Desenclos C, Toussaint P et al (2015) Frameless robotic stereotactic biopsies: a consecutive series of 100 cases. J Neurosurg 122:342–352CrossRef Lefranc M, Capel C, Pruvot-Occean A-S, Fichten A, Desenclos C, Toussaint P et al (2015) Frameless robotic stereotactic biopsies: a consecutive series of 100 cases. J Neurosurg 122:342–352CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, Wiemann R, Black PM, Golby AJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques. World Neurosurg 83:261–268CrossRef Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, Wiemann R, Black PM, Golby AJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques. World Neurosurg 83:261–268CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mascott CR (2006) In vivo accuracy of image guidance performed using optical tracking and optimized registration. J Neurosurg 105:4CrossRef Mascott CR (2006) In vivo accuracy of image guidance performed using optical tracking and optimized registration. J Neurosurg 105:4CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Reavey-Cantwell JF, Bova FJ, Pincus DW (2006) Frameless, pinless stereotactic neurosurgery in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 104(6):392–395CrossRef Reavey-Cantwell JF, Bova FJ, Pincus DW (2006) Frameless, pinless stereotactic neurosurgery in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 104(6):392–395CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shooman D, Belli A, Grundy PL (2010) Image-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy without intraoperative neuropathological examination. J Neurosurg 113:170–178CrossRef Shooman D, Belli A, Grundy PL (2010) Image-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy without intraoperative neuropathological examination. J Neurosurg 113:170–178CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Spetzger U, Laborde G, Gilsbach JM (1995) Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 38:163–166CrossRef Spetzger U, Laborde G, Gilsbach JM (1995) Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 38:163–166CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Verploegh ISC, Volovici V, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Dirven CM, Kros JM et al (2015) Contemporary frameless intracranial biopsy techniques: might variation in safety and efficacy be expected. Acta Neurochir 157:2011–2016CrossRef Verploegh ISC, Volovici V, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Dirven CM, Kros JM et al (2015) Contemporary frameless intracranial biopsy techniques: might variation in safety and efficacy be expected. Acta Neurochir 157:2011–2016CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Watanabe E, Watanabe T, Manaka S, Mayanagi Y, Takakura K (1987) Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): new equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery. Surg Neurol 27:543–547CrossRef Watanabe E, Watanabe T, Manaka S, Mayanagi Y, Takakura K (1987) Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): new equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery. Surg Neurol 27:543–547CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2006) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 104:233–237CrossRef Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2006) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 104:233–237CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zhang QJ, Wang WH, Wei XP, Yu YG (2013) Safety and efficacy of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy techniques. Chin Med Sci J 28:113–116CrossRef Zhang QJ, Wang WH, Wei XP, Yu YG (2013) Safety and efficacy of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy techniques. Chin Med Sci J 28:113–116CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Safety and accuracy of frameless electromagnetic-navigated (AXIEMTM)-guided brain lesion biopsies: a large single-unit study
Authors
Anastasios Giamouriadis
Duranka Perera
Afshan Safdar
Francesco Vergani
Ranjeev Bhangoo
Richard Gullan
Keyoumars Ashkan
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Keyword
Brain Tumor
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04093-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2019 Go to the issue

Letter to the editor - Brain Tumors

Spheno-orbital meningiomas