Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 11/2015

Open Access 01-11-2015 | Clinical Article - Brain Tumors

Contemporary frameless intracranial biopsy techniques: Might variation in safety and efficacy be expected?

Authors: Iris S. C. Verploegh, Victor Volovici, Iain K. Haitsma, Joost W. Schouten, Clemens M. Dirven, Johan M. Kros, Ruben Dammers

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Frameless stereotactic neuronavigation has proven to be a feasible technology to acquire brain biopsies with good accuracy and little morbidity and mortality. New systems are constantly introduced into the neurosurgical armamentarium, although few studies have actually evaluated and compared the diagnostic yield, morbidity, and mortality of various manufacturer’s frameless neuronavigation systems. The present study reports our experience with brain biopsy procedures performed using both the Medtronic Stealth TreonTM Vertek® and BrainLAB® Varioguide frameless stereotactic brain biopsy systems.

Patients and methods

All 247 consecutive biopsies from January 2008 until May 2013 were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred two biopsies each were performed using the Medtronic (2008–2009) and BrainLAB® system (2011–2013), respectively. The year 2010 was considered a transition year, in which 43 biopsies were performed with either system. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and histological diagnosis were reviewed, and a comparison was made between the two brain biopsy systems.

Results

The overall diagnostic yield was 94.6 %, i.e., 11 biopsies were nondiagnostic, 5 (4.9 %) with the Medtronic and 6 (5.9 %) with the BrainLAB® system. No differences besides the operating time (108 vs 120 min) were found between the two biopsy methods. On average, 6.6 tissue samples were taken with either technique. Peri- and postoperative complications were seen in 5.3 % and 12.9 %, consisting of three symptomatic hemorrhages (1.2 %). Biopsy-related mortality occurred in 0.8 % of all biopsies.

Conclusions

Regarding diagnostic yield, complication rate, and biopsy-related mortality, there seems to be no difference between the frameless biopsy technique from Medtronic and BrainLAB®. In contemporary time, the neurosurgeon has many tools to choose from, all with a relatively fast learning curve and ever improving feasibility. Thus, the issue of choice involves not the results, but the familiarity, end-user friendliness, and overall comfort when operating the system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bekelis K, Radwan TA, Desai A, Roberts DW (2012) Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy: feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety. J Neurosurg 116(5):1002–1006CrossRefPubMed Bekelis K, Radwan TA, Desai A, Roberts DW (2012) Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy: feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety. J Neurosurg 116(5):1002–1006CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Burkhardt JK, Neidert MC, Woernle CM, Bozinov O, Bernays RL (2013) Intraoperative low-field MR-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy for intracerebral lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155(4):721–726CrossRef Burkhardt JK, Neidert MC, Woernle CM, Bozinov O, Bernays RL (2013) Intraoperative low-field MR-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy for intracerebral lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155(4):721–726CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJ, Vincent AJ (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150(1):23–29CrossRef Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJ, Vincent AJ (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150(1):23–29CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dammers R, Schouten JW, Haitsma IK, Vincent AJ, Kros JM, Dirven CM (2010) Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(11):1915–1921CrossRef Dammers R, Schouten JW, Haitsma IK, Vincent AJ, Kros JM, Dirven CM (2010) Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(11):1915–1921CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fridley J, Thomas JG, Navarro JC, Yoshor D (2012) Brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy. Neurosurg Focus 32(3):E13CrossRefPubMed Fridley J, Thomas JG, Navarro JC, Yoshor D (2012) Brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy. Neurosurg Focus 32(3):E13CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gempt J, Buchmann N, Ryang YM, Krieg S, Kreutzer J, Meyer B, Ringel F (2012) Frameless image-guided stereotaxy with real-time visual feedback for brain biopsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(9):1663–1667CrossRef Gempt J, Buchmann N, Ryang YM, Krieg S, Kreutzer J, Meyer B, Ringel F (2012) Frameless image-guided stereotaxy with real-time visual feedback for brain biopsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(9):1663–1667CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harrisson SE, Shooman D, Grundy PL (2012) A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of frameless, pinless electromagnetic image-guided biopsy of cerebral lesions. Neurosurgery 70(1 Suppl Operative):29–33, discussion 33PubMed Harrisson SE, Shooman D, Grundy PL (2012) A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of frameless, pinless electromagnetic image-guided biopsy of cerebral lesions. Neurosurgery 70(1 Suppl Operative):29–33, discussion 33PubMed
9.
go back to reference Khatab S, Spliet W, Woerdeman PA (2014) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsies: emphasis on diagnostic yield. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(8):1441–1450CrossRef Khatab S, Spliet W, Woerdeman PA (2014) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsies: emphasis on diagnostic yield. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(8):1441–1450CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lefranc M, Capel C, Pruvot-Occean AS, Fichten A, Desenclos C, Toussaint P, Le Gars D, Peltier J (2015) Frameless robotic stereotactic biopsies: a consecutive series of 100 cases. J Neurosurg 122(2):342–352CrossRefPubMed Lefranc M, Capel C, Pruvot-Occean AS, Fichten A, Desenclos C, Toussaint P, Le Gars D, Peltier J (2015) Frameless robotic stereotactic biopsies: a consecutive series of 100 cases. J Neurosurg 122(2):342–352CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Livermore LJ, Ma R, Bojanic S, Pereira EA (2014) Yield and complications of frame-based and frameless stereotactic brain biopsy--the value of intra-operative histological analysis. Br J Neurosurg 28(5):637–644CrossRefPubMed Livermore LJ, Ma R, Bojanic S, Pereira EA (2014) Yield and complications of frame-based and frameless stereotactic brain biopsy--the value of intra-operative histological analysis. Br J Neurosurg 28(5):637–644CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, Wiemann R, Black PM, Golby AJ (2014) Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques. World Neurosurg 83(3):261-268 Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, Wiemann R, Black PM, Golby AJ (2014) Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques. World Neurosurg 83(3):261-268
13.
go back to reference Misch M, Guggemos A, Driever PH, Koch A, Grosse F, Steffen IG, Plotkin M, Thomale UW (2015) (18)F-FET-PET guided surgical biopsy and resection in children and adolescence with brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 31(2):261–267CrossRefPubMed Misch M, Guggemos A, Driever PH, Koch A, Grosse F, Steffen IG, Plotkin M, Thomale UW (2015) (18)F-FET-PET guided surgical biopsy and resection in children and adolescence with brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 31(2):261–267CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pirotte BJ, Lubansu A, Massager N, Wikler D, Goldman S, Levivier M (2007) Results of positron emission tomography guidance and reassessment of the utility of and indications for stereotactic biopsy in children with infiltrative brainstem tumors. J Neurosurg 107(5 Suppl):392–399PubMed Pirotte BJ, Lubansu A, Massager N, Wikler D, Goldman S, Levivier M (2007) Results of positron emission tomography guidance and reassessment of the utility of and indications for stereotactic biopsy in children with infiltrative brainstem tumors. J Neurosurg 107(5 Suppl):392–399PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ringel F, Ingerl D, Ott S, Meyer B (2009) VarioGuide: a new frameless image-guided stereotactic system—accuracy study and clinical assessment. Neurosurgery 64(5 Suppl 2):365–371, discussion 371–3PubMed Ringel F, Ingerl D, Ott S, Meyer B (2009) VarioGuide: a new frameless image-guided stereotactic system—accuracy study and clinical assessment. Neurosurgery 64(5 Suppl 2):365–371, discussion 371–3PubMed
16.
go back to reference Shooman D, Belli A, Grundy PL (2010) Image-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy without intraoperative neuropathological examination. J Neurosurg 113(2):170–178CrossRefPubMed Shooman D, Belli A, Grundy PL (2010) Image-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy without intraoperative neuropathological examination. J Neurosurg 113(2):170–178CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Widhalm G, Minchev G, Woehrer A, Preusser M, Kiesel B, Furtner J, Mert A, Di Ieva A, Tomanek B, Prayer D, Marosi C, Hainfellner JA, Knosp E, Wolfsberger S (2012) Strong 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence is a novel intraoperative marker for representative tissue samples in stereotactic brain tumor biopsies. Neurosurg Rev 35(3):381–391, discussion 391CrossRefPubMed Widhalm G, Minchev G, Woehrer A, Preusser M, Kiesel B, Furtner J, Mert A, Di Ieva A, Tomanek B, Prayer D, Marosi C, Hainfellner JA, Knosp E, Wolfsberger S (2012) Strong 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence is a novel intraoperative marker for representative tissue samples in stereotactic brain tumor biopsies. Neurosurg Rev 35(3):381–391, discussion 391CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yuen J, Zhu CX, Chan DT, Ng RY, Nia W, Poon WS, Ng HK, Mok VC, Wong LK, Cheung TC, Siu DY (2014) A sequential comparison on the risk of haemorrhage with different sizes of biopsy needles for stereotactic brain biopsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 92(3):160–169PubMed Yuen J, Zhu CX, Chan DT, Ng RY, Nia W, Poon WS, Ng HK, Mok VC, Wong LK, Cheung TC, Siu DY (2014) A sequential comparison on the risk of haemorrhage with different sizes of biopsy needles for stereotactic brain biopsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 92(3):160–169PubMed
19.
go back to reference Zhang JS, Chen XL, Li FY, Li JJ, Zheng G, Zhang T, Hu S, Xu BN (2012) Implementation of VarioGuide in stereotactic brain biopsy: a preliminary experience. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 92(21):1468–1471PubMed Zhang JS, Chen XL, Li FY, Li JJ, Zheng G, Zhang T, Hu S, Xu BN (2012) Implementation of VarioGuide in stereotactic brain biopsy: a preliminary experience. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 92(21):1468–1471PubMed
Metadata
Title
Contemporary frameless intracranial biopsy techniques: Might variation in safety and efficacy be expected?
Authors
Iris S. C. Verploegh
Victor Volovici
Iain K. Haitsma
Joost W. Schouten
Clemens M. Dirven
Johan M. Kros
Ruben Dammers
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2543-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Acta Neurochirurgica 11/2015 Go to the issue