Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Original Article - Peripheral Nerves

Comparative study of single and dual nerve transfers for repairing shoulder abduction

Authors: Feng Xiao, Xin Zhao, Jie Lao

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of single and dual nerve transfer for the repair of shoulder abduction in patients with upper or upper and middle trunk root avulsion.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective analysis of 20 patients with C5-C6 or C5-C7 root avulsion treated by nerve transfer in our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to the different operation methods. In group A, ten patients had transferred the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve. Ten patients in group B underwent dual nerve transfer to reconstruct shoulder abduction, including the spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve and two intercostal nerves or the long head of triceps nerve branch transfer to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. There was no difference in age, preoperative interval, follow-up time, and injury type between the two groups. We used shoulder abduction strength, shoulder abduction angle, and Samardzic’s shoulder joint evaluation standard as the postoperative evaluation index. Shoulder abductor muscle strength equals or above M3 was considered to be an effective recovery.

Results

Of the 20 cases, 15 obtained equals or more M3 of shoulder abduction strength, and the overall effective rate was 75%. The effective rate of shoulder abduction power in group A was 60% (6/10) while group B was 90% (9/10); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The average shoulder abduction angle was 55° (SD = 19.29) in group A and 77° (SD = 20.44) in group B; the angle was significantly better in group B than that in group A (p < 0.05). Based on Samardzic’s standard, the excellent and good rate of group A was 90% and in group B was 50%. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with nerve root avulsion of C5-C6 or C5-C7, repairing suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve at the same time is more effective than repairing suprascapular nerve alone in terms of shoulder abduction angle and excellent rate of functional recovery of the shoulder joint. Therefore, we recommend the repair of the suprascapular nerve and the axillary nerve simultaneously if conditions permit.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baltzer HL, Wagner ER, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2017) Evaluation of infraspinatus reinnervation and function following spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer in adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Microsurgery 37:365–370CrossRefPubMed Baltzer HL, Wagner ER, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2017) Evaluation of infraspinatus reinnervation and function following spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer in adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Microsurgery 37:365–370CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Winkelmann DE, Ghizoni MF, Duarte H (2011) Transfer of axillary nerve branches to reconstruct elbow extension in tetraplegics: a laboratory investigation of surgical feasibility. Microsurgery 31:376–381CrossRefPubMed Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Winkelmann DE, Ghizoni MF, Duarte H (2011) Transfer of axillary nerve branches to reconstruct elbow extension in tetraplegics: a laboratory investigation of surgical feasibility. Microsurgery 31:376–381CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cardenas-Mejia A, O’Boyle CP, Chen KT, Chuang DC (2008) Evaluation of single-, double-, and triple-nerve transfers for shoulder abduction in 90 patients with supraclavicular brachial plexus injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1470–1478CrossRefPubMed Cardenas-Mejia A, O’Boyle CP, Chen KT, Chuang DC (2008) Evaluation of single-, double-, and triple-nerve transfers for shoulder abduction in 90 patients with supraclavicular brachial plexus injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1470–1478CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chu B, Wang H, Chen L, Gu Y, Hu S (2016) Dual nerve transfers for restoration of shoulder function after brachial plexus avulsion injury. Ann Plast Surg 76:668–673CrossRefPubMed Chu B, Wang H, Chen L, Gu Y, Hu S (2016) Dual nerve transfers for restoration of shoulder function after brachial plexus avulsion injury. Ann Plast Surg 76:668–673CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chuang DC (2009) Adult brachial plexus reconstruction with the level of injury: review and personal experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:e359–e369CrossRefPubMed Chuang DC (2009) Adult brachial plexus reconstruction with the level of injury: review and personal experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:e359–e369CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Emamhadi M, Alijani B, Andalib S (2016) Long-term clinical outcomes of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve in patients with brachial plexus palsy. Acta Neurochir 158:1801–1806CrossRefPubMed Emamhadi M, Alijani B, Andalib S (2016) Long-term clinical outcomes of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve in patients with brachial plexus palsy. Acta Neurochir 158:1801–1806CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gao KM, Hu JJ, Lao J, Zhao X (2018) Evaluation of nerve transfer options for treating total brachial plexus avulsion injury: a retrospective study of 73 participants. Neural Regen Res 13:470–476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gao KM, Hu JJ, Lao J, Zhao X (2018) Evaluation of nerve transfer options for treating total brachial plexus avulsion injury: a retrospective study of 73 participants. Neural Regen Res 13:470–476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Gillis JA, Khouri JS, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2018) Outcomes of shoulder abduction after nerve surgery in patients over 50 years following traumatic brachial plexus injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Gillis JA, Khouri JS, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2018) Outcomes of shoulder abduction after nerve surgery in patients over 50 years following traumatic brachial plexus injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
9.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected] The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608CrossRefPubMed Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected] The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Leechavengvongs S, Malungpaishorpe K, Uerpairojkit C, Ng CY, Witoonchart K (2016) Nerve transfers to restore shoulder function. Hand Clin 32:153–164CrossRefPubMed Leechavengvongs S, Malungpaishorpe K, Uerpairojkit C, Ng CY, Witoonchart K (2016) Nerve transfers to restore shoulder function. Hand Clin 32:153–164CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Leechavengvongs S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Thuvasethakul P (2003) Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part II: a report of 7 cases. J Hand Surg Am 28:633–638CrossRefPubMed Leechavengvongs S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Thuvasethakul P (2003) Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part II: a report of 7 cases. J Hand Surg Am 28:633–638CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Malungpaishrope K, Leechavengvongs S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Boonyalapa A, Janesaksrisakul D (2012) Simultaneous intercostal nerve transfers to deltoid and triceps muscle through the posterior approach. J Hand Surg Am 37:677–682CrossRefPubMed Malungpaishrope K, Leechavengvongs S, Witoonchart K, Uerpairojkit C, Boonyalapa A, Janesaksrisakul D (2012) Simultaneous intercostal nerve transfers to deltoid and triceps muscle through the posterior approach. J Hand Surg Am 37:677–682CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Merrell GA, Barrie KA, Katz DL, Wolfe SW (2001) Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature. J Hand Surg Am 26:303–314CrossRefPubMed Merrell GA, Barrie KA, Katz DL, Wolfe SW (2001) Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature. J Hand Surg Am 26:303–314CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Samardzic M, Grujicic D, Rasulic L, Bacetic D (2002) Transfer of the medial pectoral nerve: myth or reality? Neurosurgery 50:1277–1282PubMed Samardzic M, Grujicic D, Rasulic L, Bacetic D (2002) Transfer of the medial pectoral nerve: myth or reality? Neurosurgery 50:1277–1282PubMed
15.
go back to reference Schreiber JJ, Byun DJ, Khair MM, Rosenblatt L, Lee SK, Wolfe SW (2015) Optimal axon counts for brachial plexus nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:135e–141eCrossRefPubMed Schreiber JJ, Byun DJ, Khair MM, Rosenblatt L, Lee SK, Wolfe SW (2015) Optimal axon counts for brachial plexus nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:135e–141eCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Terzis JK, Barmpitsioti A (2010) Axillary nerve reconstruction in 176 posttraumatic plexopathy patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:233–247CrossRefPubMed Terzis JK, Barmpitsioti A (2010) Axillary nerve reconstruction in 176 posttraumatic plexopathy patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:233–247CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vanaclocha V, Herrera JM, Rivera-Paz M, Martinez-Gomez D, Vanaclocha L (2018) Radial to axillary nerve transfer. Neurosurg Focus 44:V1CrossRefPubMed Vanaclocha V, Herrera JM, Rivera-Paz M, Martinez-Gomez D, Vanaclocha L (2018) Radial to axillary nerve transfer. Neurosurg Focus 44:V1CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative study of single and dual nerve transfers for repairing shoulder abduction
Authors
Feng Xiao
Xin Zhao
Jie Lao
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03847-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Acta Neurochirurgica 4/2019 Go to the issue

Editorial (by Invitation) - Neurosurgery general

Randomized controlled trials in surgery and the glass ceiling effect