Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 1/2019

Open Access 01-01-2019 | Original Article - Neurosurgery general

Social media for dissemination and public engagement in neurosurgery—the example of Brainbook

Authors: A. Alamri, P. Rogers, C. Kearns, T. Doke, A. Al-Habib, F. Servadei, P. J. Hutchinson, A. G. Kolias, Chris Uff

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Public engagement has become one of the most effective tools in gaining feedback and perspectives from members of the public, involving patients with decisions, and inspiring young people to carry the medical profession forwards. Brainbook is a multi-platform, social media-based resource that was created specifically to enhance public engagement in neurosurgery and results from one of its case discussions will be reported in this paper.

Methods

A Brainbook case was created in collaboration with the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma and presented over 3 days (23–25 February 2018). YouTube videos were created depicting the management of an acute subdural haematoma using patient interviews, medical illustration, consultant-led discussion and operative footage. Content was shared across all Brainbook social media platforms and analytics were gathered through social media applications.

Results

Over a 72-hour time period, and across multiple social media accounts, 101,418 impressions were achieved (defined as penetrance onto individual media feeds and total views of the content), with active discussion on social media.

Conclusions

Neurosurgical content published across multiple social media outlets represents an encouraging and exciting potential for global engagement across multiple audiences. Social media can be an effective method of not only disseminating neurosurgical knowledge, but activating and engaging the public, allied healthcare professionals, medical students and neurosurgeons.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bruni RA, Laupacis A, Martin DK, University of Toronto Priority Setting in Health Care Research Group (2008) Public engagement in setting priorities in health care. CMAJ 179(1):15–18CrossRef Bruni RA, Laupacis A, Martin DK, University of Toronto Priority Setting in Health Care Research Group (2008) Public engagement in setting priorities in health care. CMAJ 179(1):15–18CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Flynn D, Knoedler MA, Hess EP, Murad MH, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, Thomson RG (2012) Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 19(8):959–967CrossRefPubMed Flynn D, Knoedler MA, Hess EP, Murad MH, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, Thomson RG (2012) Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 19(8):959–967CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference General Medical Council (GMC) (2013) Good medical practice (2013). GMC Website 36 General Medical Council (GMC) (2013) Good medical practice (2013). GMC Website 36
5.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Greene J (2013) What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff 32(2):207–214CrossRef Hibbard JH, Greene J (2013) What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff 32(2):207–214CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A, Stobbart L, Tomson D, Macphail S, Dodd C, Brain K, Elwyn G, Thomson R (2017) Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme. BMJ 357:j1744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A, Stobbart L, Tomson D, Macphail S, Dodd C, Brain K, Elwyn G, Thomson R (2017) Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme. BMJ 357:j1744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Riesch H, Potter C, Davies L (2016) What is public engagement, and what is it for? A study of scientists’ and science communicators’ views. Bull Sci Technol Soc 36(3):179–189CrossRef Riesch H, Potter C, Davies L (2016) What is public engagement, and what is it for? A study of scientists’ and science communicators’ views. Bull Sci Technol Soc 36(3):179–189CrossRef
9.
13.
go back to reference Traulsen JM, Almarsdóttir AB (2005) Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public. Pharm World Sci 27(4):273–277CrossRefPubMed Traulsen JM, Almarsdóttir AB (2005) Pharmaceutical policy and the lay public. Pharm World Sci 27(4):273–277CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Social media for dissemination and public engagement in neurosurgery—the example of Brainbook
Authors
A. Alamri
P. Rogers
C. Kearns
T. Doke
A. Al-Habib
F. Servadei
P. J. Hutchinson
A. G. Kolias
Chris Uff
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3757-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Acta Neurochirurgica 1/2019 Go to the issue