Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article - Vascular

Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurointerventional procedures

Authors: Luigi Rigante, Walid Moudrous, Joost de Vries, André J. Grotenhuis, Hieronymus D. Boogaarts

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Operating rooms account for 70% of hospital waste, increasing healthcare costs and creating environmental hazards. Endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular pathologies has become prominent, and associated products highly impact the total cost of care. We investigated the costs of endovascular surgical waste at our institution.

Methods

Data from 53 consecutive endovascular procedures at the Radboud UMC Nijmegen from May to December 2016 were collected. “Unused disposable supply” was defined as one-time use items opened but not used during the procedure. Two observers cataloged the unused disposable supply for each case. The cost of each item was determined from the center supply catalog, and these costs were summed to determine the total cost of unused supply per case.

Results

Thirteen diagnostic cerebral digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) (24.5%) and 40 endovascular procedures (75.5%) were analyzed. Total interventional waste was 27,299.53 € (mean 515.09 € per procedure). While total costs of unused disposable supply were almost irrelevant for DSAs, they were consistent for interventional procedures (mean 676.49 € per case). Aneurysm standard coiling had the highest impact on total interventional waste (mean 1061.55 €). Disposable interventional products had a very high impact on the surgical waste costs in the series of the neurointerventional procedures (95% of total waste).

Conclusions

This study shows the impact of neurointerventional waste on the total care costs for cerebrovascular patients. This might reflect the tendency to anticipate needs and emergencies in neurointervention. Responsible use of disposable material can be achieved by educating operators and nurses and creating operator preference cards.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Albert MG, Rothkopf DM (2015) Operating room waste reduction in plastic and hand surgery. Plast Surg (Oakv) 23(4):235–238 Albert MG, Rothkopf DM (2015) Operating room waste reduction in plastic and hand surgery. Plast Surg (Oakv) 23(4):235–238
2.
go back to reference Ast MP, Mayman DJ, Su EP, Gonzalez Della Valle AM, Parks ML, Haas SB (2014) The reduction of implant-related errors and waste in total knee arthroplasty using a novel, computer based, e.Label and compatibility system. J Arthroplast 29(1):132–136CrossRef Ast MP, Mayman DJ, Su EP, Gonzalez Della Valle AM, Parks ML, Haas SB (2014) The reduction of implant-related errors and waste in total knee arthroplasty using a novel, computer based, e.Label and compatibility system. J Arthroplast 29(1):132–136CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Atcheson CL, Spivack J, Williams R, Bryson EO (2016) Preventable drug waste among anesthesia providers: opportunities for efficiency. J Clin Anesth 30:24–32CrossRefPubMed Atcheson CL, Spivack J, Williams R, Bryson EO (2016) Preventable drug waste among anesthesia providers: opportunities for efficiency. J Clin Anesth 30:24–32CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference de Vries J, Boogarts HD (2014) Treatment of patients with ruptured aneurysm by neurosurgeons that perform both open surgical and endovascular techniques is safe and effective: results of a single centre in Europe. Acta Neurochir 156(7):1259–1266 discussion 1266CrossRefPubMed de Vries J, Boogarts HD (2014) Treatment of patients with ruptured aneurysm by neurosurgeons that perform both open surgical and endovascular techniques is safe and effective: results of a single centre in Europe. Acta Neurochir 156(7):1259–1266 discussion 1266CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Payne A, Slover J, Inneh I, Hutzler L, Iorio R, Bosco JA 3rd (2015) Orthopedic implant waste: analysis and quantification. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 44(12):554–560 Payne A, Slover J, Inneh I, Hutzler L, Iorio R, Bosco JA 3rd (2015) Orthopedic implant waste: analysis and quantification. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 44(12):554–560
6.
go back to reference Sorkin GC, Dumont TM, Eller JL et al (2014) Cerebrovascular neurosurgery in evolution: the endovascular paradigm. Neurosurgery 74(Suppl 1):S191–S197CrossRefPubMed Sorkin GC, Dumont TM, Eller JL et al (2014) Cerebrovascular neurosurgery in evolution: the endovascular paradigm. Neurosurgery 74(Suppl 1):S191–S197CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Soroceanu A, Canacari E, Brown E, Robinson A, McGuire KJ (2011) Intraoperative waste in spine surgery: incidence, cost, and effectiveness of an educational program. Spine 36(19):E1270–E1273CrossRefPubMed Soroceanu A, Canacari E, Brown E, Robinson A, McGuire KJ (2011) Intraoperative waste in spine surgery: incidence, cost, and effectiveness of an educational program. Spine 36(19):E1270–E1273CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zygourakis CC, Yoon S, Valencia V, Boscardin C, Moriates C, Gonzales R et al (2017) Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurosurgical procedures. J Neurosurg 126(2):620–625CrossRefPubMed Zygourakis CC, Yoon S, Valencia V, Boscardin C, Moriates C, Gonzales R et al (2017) Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurosurgical procedures. J Neurosurg 126(2):620–625CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurointerventional procedures
Authors
Luigi Rigante
Walid Moudrous
Joost de Vries
André J. Grotenhuis
Hieronymus D. Boogaarts
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3366-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2017 Go to the issue