Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Techniques

Intraoperative low-field MR-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy for intracerebral lesions

Authors: Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Marian C. Neidert, Christoph M. Woernle, Oliver Bozinov, René-Ludwig Bernays

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To present our intraoperative low-field magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) technique for stereotactic brain biopsy in various intracerebral lesions.

Method

Seventy-eight consecutive patients underwent stereotactic biopsies with the PoleStar N-20/N-30 ioMRI system and data were evaluated retrospectively. Biopsy technique included ioMRI before surgery, followed by insertion of the biopsy cannula in the lesion, and ioMRI before and after biopsy. Statistical analysis was performed to compare subgroups using Excel and SPSS statistic software.

Results

In all patients, stereotactic biopsy was possible, with a mean intraoperative surgery time of 86.2 ± 28.6 min and a mean hospital stay of 11.6 ± 4.6 days. In 97.4 % (n = 76), histology was conclusive, representing 58 brain tumors and 18 other pathologies. Five patients were biopsied previously without conclusive diagnosis, and all biopsies were conclusive this time. Mean cross-sectional lesion size in MRI T1 with contrast (n = 64) was 6.9 ± 5.7 cm2, and in lesions without T1 contrast enhancement (n = 14), T2 mean cross-sectional lesion size was 5.5 ± 3.9 cm2. Mean distance from the cortex surface to the lesion was 3.4 ± 1.2 cm. One patient suffered from a postoperative wound dehiscence; neither clinically or radiologically significant hemorrhage after surgery, nor intraoperative complications occurred.

Conclusions

Low-field ioMR-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy accurately diagnosed different intracerebral lesions without major complications for the patients, and within an acceptable surgery time and hospital stay. In repeated non-conclusive biopsies in particular, low-field ioMRI offers a technique for arriving at a diagnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Air EL, Warnick RE, McPherson CM (2012) Management strategies after nondiagnostic results with frameless stereotactic needle biopsy: Retrospective review of 28 patients. Surg Neurol Int 3:S315–319PubMedCrossRef Air EL, Warnick RE, McPherson CM (2012) Management strategies after nondiagnostic results with frameless stereotactic needle biopsy: Retrospective review of 28 patients. Surg Neurol Int 3:S315–319PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bernays RL, Kollias SS, Khan N, Brandner S, Meier S, Yonekawa Y (2002) Histological yield, complications, and technological considerations in 114 consecutive frameless stereotactic biopsy procedures aided by open intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 97:354–362PubMedCrossRef Bernays RL, Kollias SS, Khan N, Brandner S, Meier S, Yonekawa Y (2002) Histological yield, complications, and technological considerations in 114 consecutive frameless stereotactic biopsy procedures aided by open intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 97:354–362PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bernstein M, Al-Anazi AR, Kucharczyk W, Manninen P, Bronskill M, Henkelman M (2000) Brain tumor surgery with the Toronto open magnetic resonance imaging system: preliminary results for 36 patients and analysis of advantages, disadvantages, and future prospects. Neurosurgery 46:900–907, discussion 907–909PubMed Bernstein M, Al-Anazi AR, Kucharczyk W, Manninen P, Bronskill M, Henkelman M (2000) Brain tumor surgery with the Toronto open magnetic resonance imaging system: preliminary results for 36 patients and analysis of advantages, disadvantages, and future prospects. Neurosurgery 46:900–907, discussion 907–909PubMed
4.
go back to reference Czyz M, Tabakow P, Lechowicz-Glogowska B, Jarmundowicz W (2011) Prospective study on the efficacy of low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgical operations. Neurol Neurochir Pol 45:226–234PubMed Czyz M, Tabakow P, Lechowicz-Glogowska B, Jarmundowicz W (2011) Prospective study on the efficacy of low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgical operations. Neurol Neurochir Pol 45:226–234PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJ, Vincent AJ (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:23–29CrossRef Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJ, Vincent AJ (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:23–29CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Nimsky C (2000) Intraoperative imaging with open magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation. Childs Nerv Syst 16:829–831PubMedCrossRef Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Nimsky C (2000) Intraoperative imaging with open magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation. Childs Nerv Syst 16:829–831PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gempt J, Buchmann N, Ryang YM, Krieg S, Kreutzer J, Meyer B, Ringel F (2012) Frameless image-guided stereotaxy with real-time visual feedback for brain biopsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:1663–1667CrossRef Gempt J, Buchmann N, Ryang YM, Krieg S, Kreutzer J, Meyer B, Ringel F (2012) Frameless image-guided stereotaxy with real-time visual feedback for brain biopsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:1663–1667CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hall WA (1998) The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 82:1749–1755PubMedCrossRef Hall WA (1998) The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 82:1749–1755PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hall WA, Martin AJ, Liu H, Nussbaum ES, Maxwell RE, Truwit CL (1999) Brain biopsy using high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 44:807–813, discussion 813–804PubMedCrossRef Hall WA, Martin AJ, Liu H, Nussbaum ES, Maxwell RE, Truwit CL (1999) Brain biopsy using high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 44:807–813, discussion 813–804PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kanner AA, Vogelbaum MA, Mayberg MR, Weisenberger JP, Barnett GH (2002) Intracranial navigation by using low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. J Neurosurg 97:1115–1124PubMedCrossRef Kanner AA, Vogelbaum MA, Mayberg MR, Weisenberger JP, Barnett GH (2002) Intracranial navigation by using low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. J Neurosurg 97:1115–1124PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kollias SS, Bernays R, Marugg RA, Romanowski B, Yonekawa Y, Valavanis A (1998) Target definition and trajectory optimization for interactive MR-guided biopsies of brain tumors in an open configuration MRI system. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:143–159PubMedCrossRef Kollias SS, Bernays R, Marugg RA, Romanowski B, Yonekawa Y, Valavanis A (1998) Target definition and trajectory optimization for interactive MR-guided biopsies of brain tumors in an open configuration MRI system. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:143–159PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Quinn J, Spiro D, Schulder M (2011) Stereotactic brain biopsy with a low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imager. Neurosurgery 68:217–224, discussion 224PubMedCrossRef Quinn J, Spiro D, Schulder M (2011) Stereotactic brain biopsy with a low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imager. Neurosurgery 68:217–224, discussion 224PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schulder M, Catrambone J, Carmel PW (2005) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging at 0.12 T: is it enough? Neurosurg Clin N Am 16:143–154PubMedCrossRef Schulder M, Catrambone J, Carmel PW (2005) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging at 0.12 T: is it enough? Neurosurg Clin N Am 16:143–154PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schulder M, Spiro D (2011) Intraoperative MRI for stereotactic biopsy. Acta Neurochir Suppl 109:81–87PubMedCrossRef Schulder M, Spiro D (2011) Intraoperative MRI for stereotactic biopsy. Acta Neurochir Suppl 109:81–87PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tronnier VM, Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Lenz G, Pastyr O, Bonsanto MM, Albert FK, Kuth R, Staubert A, Schlegel W, Sartor K, Kunze S (1997) Intraoperative diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 40:891–900, discussion 900–892PubMedCrossRef Tronnier VM, Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Lenz G, Pastyr O, Bonsanto MM, Albert FK, Kuth R, Staubert A, Schlegel W, Sartor K, Kunze S (1997) Intraoperative diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 40:891–900, discussion 900–892PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tsermoulas G, Mukerji N, Borah AJ, Mitchell P, Ross N (2012) Factors affecting diagnostic yield in needle biopsy for brain lesions. Br J Neurosurg Tsermoulas G, Mukerji N, Borah AJ, Mitchell P, Ross N (2012) Factors affecting diagnostic yield in needle biopsy for brain lesions. Br J Neurosurg
17.
go back to reference van Velthoven V, Auer LM (1990) Practical application of intraoperative ultrasound imaging. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 105:5–13CrossRef van Velthoven V, Auer LM (1990) Practical application of intraoperative ultrasound imaging. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 105:5–13CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wen DY, Hall WA, Miller DA, Seljeskog EL, Maxwell RE (1993) Targeted brain biopsy: a comparison of freehand computed tomography-guided and stereotactic techniques. Neurosurgery 32:407–412, discussion 412–403PubMedCrossRef Wen DY, Hall WA, Miller DA, Seljeskog EL, Maxwell RE (1993) Targeted brain biopsy: a comparison of freehand computed tomography-guided and stereotactic techniques. Neurosurgery 32:407–412, discussion 412–403PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intraoperative low-field MR-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy for intracerebral lesions
Authors
Jan-Karl Burkhardt
Marian C. Neidert
Christoph M. Woernle
Oliver Bozinov
René-Ludwig Bernays
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1639-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Acta Neurochirurgica 4/2013 Go to the issue