Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

Delorme surgery for colonic mucosal prolapse after intersphincteric resection

Authors: Satoshi Narihiro, Naoko Miura, Yuji Nishizawa, Hiro Hasegawa, Koji Ikeda, Koichi Teramura, Yuichiro Tsukada, Takeshi Sasaki, Masaaki Ito

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Mucosal prolapse at the site of anastomosis is a long-term complication unique to ISR. It reduces the QOL of patients due to a worsened anal function and local symptoms around the anus. We herein sought to assess the surgical outcomes after Delorme surgery for these patients.

Methods

ISR was performed in 720 patients with low rectal cancer between January 2001 and March 2019 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Among these patients, the 33 (4.5%) who underwent initial Delorme surgery for postoperative colonic mucosal prolapse were identified from the medical records and then were analyzed retrospectively. We estimated the anal function using Wexner’s incontinence score and assessed whether local anal symptoms due to the prolapse improved postoperatively.

Results

Stoma closure was performed before Delorme surgery in 15 (45.5%) patients, and we compared the preoperative and postoperative anal function in these patients. The average Wexner’s incontinence score changed from 15.1 before to 12.9 after Delorme surgery. Local symptoms around the anus improved in all 33 (100%) patients. Recurrence of colonic mucosal prolapse occurred in 5 patients (15%), and Delorme surgery was reperformed in these cases.

Conclusion

Delorme surgery for colonic mucosal prolapse following ISR has clinical benefits for both improving anal local symptoms and slightly improving the anal function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Huang YJ, Lin YK, Chen CC, Tong YS, et al. Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;11:4466–71.CrossRef Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Huang YJ, Lin YK, Chen CC, Tong YS, et al. Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;11:4466–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ito M, Saito N, Nishizawa Y, Sasaki T, Tukada Y. Anal function after ISR. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2016;69:294–6. Ito M, Saito N, Nishizawa Y, Sasaki T, Tukada Y. Anal function after ISR. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2016;69:294–6.
3.
go back to reference Chau A, Frasson M, Debove C, Maggiori L, Panis Y. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:701–5.CrossRef Chau A, Frasson M, Debove C, Maggiori L, Panis Y. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:701–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tobin SA, Scott IH. Delorme operation for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1681–4.CrossRef Tobin SA, Scott IH. Delorme operation for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1681–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRef Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Harata K, Haruki N, Mizoguchi K, Kato T, Denda Y, Fuzita K. A case of mucosal prolapse performed by delorme procedure after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2019;80:1352–9.CrossRef Harata K, Haruki N, Mizoguchi K, Kato T, Denda Y, Fuzita K. A case of mucosal prolapse performed by delorme procedure after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2019;80:1352–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kamino T, Kobayashi S, Kurume Y. A case of Delorme surgery for intestinal prolapse after ISR. Operation. 2018;72:1805–8. Kamino T, Kobayashi S, Kurume Y. A case of Delorme surgery for intestinal prolapse after ISR. Operation. 2018;72:1805–8.
8.
go back to reference Sumikoshi Y, Takano M. Current status of anal disease treatment. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1970;23:36–40. Sumikoshi Y, Takano M. Current status of anal disease treatment. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1970;23:36–40.
9.
go back to reference Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.CrossRef Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):603–12.CrossRef Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(5):603–12.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martellucci J. Low anterior resection syndrome: a treatment algorithm. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:79–82.CrossRef Martellucci J. Low anterior resection syndrome: a treatment algorithm. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:79–82.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim G, et al. The effect of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function after the reversal of temporary stoma when administered during the temporary stoma period in rectal cancer patients with sphincter saving surgery. Medicine. 2016;95:3611.CrossRef Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim G, et al. The effect of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function after the reversal of temporary stoma when administered during the temporary stoma period in rectal cancer patients with sphincter saving surgery. Medicine. 2016;95:3611.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thomas GP, Bradshaw E, Vaizey CJ. A review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following rectal surgery and radiotherapy. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:939–42.CrossRef Thomas GP, Bradshaw E, Vaizey CJ. A review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following rectal surgery and radiotherapy. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:939–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(6):832–8.CrossRef Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(6):832–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Barisic G, Markovic V, Popovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Gavrilovic P, Krivokapic Z. Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:638–43.CrossRef Barisic G, Markovic V, Popovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Gavrilovic P, Krivokapic Z. Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:638–43.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kuo LJ, Hung CS, Wu CH, Wang W, Tam KW, Liang HH, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;170:93–8.CrossRef Kuo LJ, Hung CS, Wu CH, Wang W, Tam KW, Liang HH, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;170:93–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yoshioka K, Hata Y, Matsuura S. Problems of long-term management after ISR and its countermeasures. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2014;69:326–31. Yoshioka K, Hata Y, Matsuura S. Problems of long-term management after ISR and its countermeasures. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2014;69:326–31.
18.
go back to reference Konn M, Nakata I, Ono K. Rectal prolapse. Classification and causation. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1982;35:454–8. Konn M, Nakata I, Ono K. Rectal prolapse. Classification and causation. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1982;35:454–8.
19.
go back to reference Hoore DA, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1500–5.CrossRef Hoore DA, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1500–5.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Iwadare J, Sumikoshi Y, Ono R, Kouda M, Yamamoto K, Azuma M, et al. Etiology and treatment of rectal prolapse. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1989;42:981–6. Iwadare J, Sumikoshi Y, Ono R, Kouda M, Yamamoto K, Azuma M, et al. Etiology and treatment of rectal prolapse. J Anus Rectum Colon. 1989;42:981–6.
21.
go back to reference Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Alexander JW. One-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse: twelve years experience. Arch Surg. 1964;89:6–16.CrossRef Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Alexander JW. One-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse: twelve years experience. Arch Surg. 1964;89:6–16.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yoon SG. Rectal prolapse: review according to the personal experience. J Koran Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:107–13.CrossRef Yoon SG. Rectal prolapse: review according to the personal experience. J Koran Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:107–13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1339–46.CrossRef Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1339–46.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Russell MM, Read TE, Roberts PL, Hall JF, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, et al. Complication after rectal prolapse surgery: does approach matter? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:450–8.CrossRef Russell MM, Read TE, Roberts PL, Hall JF, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, et al. Complication after rectal prolapse surgery: does approach matter? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:450–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Gunzler D, Messing S, Monson JR, Speranza JR. It’s the procedure not the patient: the operative approach is independently associated with an increasing risk of complications after rectal prolapse repair. Colorect Dis. 2012;14:362–8.CrossRef Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Gunzler D, Messing S, Monson JR, Speranza JR. It’s the procedure not the patient: the operative approach is independently associated with an increasing risk of complications after rectal prolapse repair. Colorect Dis. 2012;14:362–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lindsey I. Commentary: best practice in rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:512–4.CrossRef Lindsey I. Commentary: best practice in rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:512–4.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1260–5.CrossRef Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1260–5.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3608–15.CrossRef Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3608–15.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Delorme surgery for colonic mucosal prolapse after intersphincteric resection
Authors
Satoshi Narihiro
Naoko Miura
Yuji Nishizawa
Hiro Hasegawa
Koji Ikeda
Koichi Teramura
Yuichiro Tsukada
Takeshi Sasaki
Masaaki Ito
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02167-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Surgery Today 6/2021 Go to the issue