Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgery Today 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Septicemia | Review Article

Clinical- and surgery-specific risk factors for post-operative sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 30 million patients

Authors: Philip Plaeke, Joris G. De Man, Samuel Coenen, Philippe G. Jorens, Benedicte Y. De Winter, Guy Hubens

Published in: Surgery Today | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Post-operative sepsis is a severe complication of surgery, which often worsens the clinical outcomes. While several risk factors have been identified, the importance of others remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine patient and surgery-related risk factors for post-operative sepsis. We reviewed Medline, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane library, systematically, for articles describing risk factors for sepsis. The role of eligible risk factors was investigated using a random-effects model, while analyzing univariate and multivariate data separately. Among 193 pro- and retrospective articles, comprising over 30 million patients, 38 eligible risk factors were selected for this meta-analysis. The patient-related risk factors associated with post-operative sepsis included male gender (odds ratio, OR 1.41), pre-existing heart failure (OR 2.53), diabetes (OR 1.41), and chronic kidney disease (OR 1.26). The surgery-related risk factors identified included emergency surgery (OR 3.38), peri-operative blood transfusion (OR 1.90), inpatient hospital stay (OR 2.31), and open surgery (OR 1.80). The adjusted overall incidence of surgical sepsis was 1.84%. In conclusion, multiple-patient and surgery-related risk factors are associated with the development of post-operative sepsis. Recognizing these risk factors could assist in the pre-operative identification of patients at risk of post-operative sepsis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801–10.CrossRef Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801–10.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Carson JL, Graham AM, Lowry SF. Postoperative sepsis in the United States. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):1065–71.CrossRef Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Carson JL, Graham AM, Lowry SF. Postoperative sepsis in the United States. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):1065–71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lorente L, Henry C, Martín MM, Jiménez A, Mora ML. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R631.CrossRef Lorente L, Henry C, Martín MM, Jiménez A, Mora ML. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R631.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Alruwaily AF, Eisner BH, Bierlein MJ, Ghani KR, Wolf JS, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Statin use and risk of sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2015;29(10):1126–30.CrossRef Alruwaily AF, Eisner BH, Bierlein MJ, Ghani KR, Wolf JS, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Statin use and risk of sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2015;29(10):1126–30.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Watanabe T, Miyata H, Konno H, Kawai K, Ishihara S, Sunami E, et al. Prediction model for complications after low anterior resection based on data from 33,411 Japanese patients included in the National Clinical Database. Surgery. 2017;161(6):1597–608.CrossRef Watanabe T, Miyata H, Konno H, Kawai K, Ishihara S, Sunami E, et al. Prediction model for complications after low anterior resection based on data from 33,411 Japanese patients included in the National Clinical Database. Surgery. 2017;161(6):1597–608.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wald HL, Ma A, Bratzler DW, Kramer AM. Indwelling urinary catheter use in the postoperative period: analysis of the national surgical infection prevention project data. Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):551–7.CrossRef Wald HL, Ma A, Bratzler DW, Kramer AM. Indwelling urinary catheter use in the postoperative period: analysis of the national surgical infection prevention project data. Arch Surg. 2008;143(6):551–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Raghavendran K, Nemzek J, Napolitano LM, Knight PR. Aspiration-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(4):818–26.CrossRef Raghavendran K, Nemzek J, Napolitano LM, Knight PR. Aspiration-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(4):818–26.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55.
9.
go back to reference Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(4):530–8.CrossRef Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(4):530–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ Clinl Res Ed. 2003;327(7414):557–60.CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ Clinl Res Ed. 2003;327(7414):557–60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41.CrossRef
203.
go back to reference Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77.CrossRef Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77.CrossRef
204.
go back to reference Bailly S, Meyfroidt G, Timsit JF. What's new in ICU in 2050: big data and machine learning. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:1524.CrossRef Bailly S, Meyfroidt G, Timsit JF. What's new in ICU in 2050: big data and machine learning. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:1524.CrossRef
205.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–42.e833.CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–42.e833.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical- and surgery-specific risk factors for post-operative sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 30 million patients
Authors
Philip Plaeke
Joris G. De Man
Samuel Coenen
Philippe G. Jorens
Benedicte Y. De Winter
Guy Hubens
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Surgery Today / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01827-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Surgery Today 5/2020 Go to the issue