Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 3/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Article • HIP - FRACTURES

Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Authors: Ahmet İmerci, Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan, Kursad Tosun

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and AO classification systems, and to investigate whether or not the experience of the surgeon had any effect on the classification.

Patients and methods

All the radiographs of 35 patients with subtrochanteric femur fracture were classified by 16 observers using the Russell Taylor, Seinsheimer and 31-AO classifications. Two groups of observers were formed of eight orthopedic surgeons, each with at least five-year experience and eight orthopedic assistants, from six different hospitals, who were invited to participate in the study. All the observers reviewed all the X-rays at this first evaluation. At 6 weeks after the first evaluation, the same radiographs were presented to each observer again in a random order and all the observers were requested to classify the fractures again. To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability, the Fleiss kappa and Cohen’s kappa values were used.

Results

In the inter-observer reliability, the mean values of the two evaluations for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.724 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.722 (substantial) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the mean values were κ:0.691 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.629 (substantial) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the mean values were κ:0.279 (fair) for the specialists and κ:0.291 (fair) for the assistants. In the intra-observer reliability, the median values for the Russell Taylor classification were determined to be κ:0.955 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.855 (almost perfect) for the assistants. Using the Seinsheimer classification, the median values were κ:0.915 (almost perfect) for the specialists and κ:0.900 (almost perfect) for the assistants, and for the AO classification, the median values were κ:0.665 (substantial) for the specialists and κ:0.695 (substantial) for the assistants.

Conclusions

As both the Russell Taylor and Seinsheimer classifications were found to be more reliable and reproducible than the AO classification for subtrochanteric femoral fractures, they can be considered to be more valuable in clinical practice and communication. The experience of the surgeons was not found to have any significance in the evaluation of these three classification systems in these types of fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burstein AH (1993) Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(12):1743–1744CrossRefPubMed Burstein AH (1993) Fracture classification systems: do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(12):1743–1744CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Roberts CS, Nawab A, Wang M, Voor MJ, Seligson D (2002) Second generation intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a biomechanical study of fracture site motion. J Orthop Trauma 16(4):231–238CrossRefPubMed Roberts CS, Nawab A, Wang M, Voor MJ, Seligson D (2002) Second generation intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a biomechanical study of fracture site motion. J Orthop Trauma 16(4):231–238CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Russell TA, Taylor JC (1992) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG (eds) Skeletal trauma. Fractures, dislocations, ligamentous injuries, 1st edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1485–1524 Russell TA, Taylor JC (1992) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG (eds) Skeletal trauma. Fractures, dislocations, ligamentous injuries, 1st edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1485–1524
4.
5.
go back to reference Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The AO classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The AO classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gehrchen PM, Nielsen JO, Olesen B, Andresen BK (1997) Seinsheimer’s classification of subtrochanteric fractures. Poor reproducibility of 4 observers’ evaluation of 50 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 68(6):524–526CrossRefPubMed Gehrchen PM, Nielsen JO, Olesen B, Andresen BK (1997) Seinsheimer’s classification of subtrochanteric fractures. Poor reproducibility of 4 observers’ evaluation of 50 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 68(6):524–526CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ (2010) Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 41(7):739–745CrossRefPubMed Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ (2010) Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 41(7):739–745CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Urrutia J, Zamora T, Besa P, Zamora M, Schweitzer D, Klaber I (2015) Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area. Injury 46(6):1054–1058CrossRefPubMed Urrutia J, Zamora T, Besa P, Zamora M, Schweitzer D, Klaber I (2015) Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area. Injury 46(6):1054–1058CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jin WJ, Dai LY, Cui YM, Zhou Q, Jiang LS, Lu H (2005) Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons. Injury 36(7):858–861CrossRefPubMed Jin WJ, Dai LY, Cui YM, Zhou Q, Jiang LS, Lu H (2005) Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons. Injury 36(7):858–861CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Lutchman L, Chirodian N (2002) Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems. Injury 33(8):713–715CrossRefPubMed Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Lutchman L, Chirodian N (2002) Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems. Injury 33(8):713–715CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van Vugt AB (2001) Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72(1):36–41CrossRefPubMed Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van Vugt AB (2001) Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72(1):36–41CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA, Roukema GR (2010) The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury 41(4):377–381CrossRefPubMed van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA, Roukema GR (2010) The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury 41(4):377–381CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Guyver PM, McCarthy MJ, Jain NP, Poulter RJ, McAllen CJ, Keenan J (2014) Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(4):513–518CrossRefPubMed Guyver PM, McCarthy MJ, Jain NP, Poulter RJ, McAllen CJ, Keenan J (2014) Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(4):513–518CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educat Psychol Measurement 33:613–619CrossRef Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educat Psychol Measurement 33:613–619CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Houshian S, Khan LA (2005) Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2217–2226PubMed Robinson CM, Houshian S, Khan LA (2005) Trochanteric-entry long cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2217–2226PubMed
18.
go back to reference Mun˜oz-Mahamud E, Garcıa-Oltra J, Ferna´ndez-Valencia A, Zumbado JA, Rıos J, Suso S, Bori G (2011) Subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a comparative study of the long proximal femoral nail and the long trochanteric fixation nail. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 21:511–516CrossRef Mun˜oz-Mahamud E, Garcıa-Oltra J, Ferna´ndez-Valencia A, Zumbado JA, Rıos J, Suso S, Bori G (2011) Subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a comparative study of the long proximal femoral nail and the long trochanteric fixation nail. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 21:511–516CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kristek D, Lovrić I, Kristek J, Biljan M, Kristek G, Sakić K (2010) The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol 34(3):937–940PubMed Kristek D, Lovrić I, Kristek J, Biljan M, Kristek G, Sakić K (2010) The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol 34(3):937–940PubMed
20.
go back to reference Johnstone DJ, Radford WJ, Parnell EJ (1993) Interobserver variation using the AO/ASIF classification of long bone fractures. Injury 24(3):163–165CrossRefPubMed Johnstone DJ, Radford WJ, Parnell EJ (1993) Interobserver variation using the AO/ASIF classification of long bone fractures. Injury 24(3):163–165CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures
Authors
Ahmet İmerci
Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan
Kursad Tosun
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2065-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 3/2018 Go to the issue