Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 4/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Article • ANKLE - FRACTURES

Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series

Authors: Amarjit Anand, Ran Wei, Akash Patel, Vikas Vedi, Garth Allardice, Bobby Singh Anand

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

No general consensus has yet been established for the gold standard treatment of ankle syndesmotic complex injuries. Recent literature has documented the success of ankle tightrope fixation for heterogeneous ankle fracture patterns, resulting in syndesmotic complex injuries. We present a multicentre case series assessing the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes of patients with Weber C ankle fractures treated with the Arthrex TightRope® fixation system.

Method

We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients with Weber C ankle fractures who were treated with the Arthrex TightRope® fixation system at four centres over a 3-year period. All patients were followed up for a mean of 14 months (range 12–26). Outcomes measures were assessed subjectively using functional scores (AOFAS and Olerud and Molander) and objectively using radiological measurements, complication rates and revision surgery rates.

Results

Thirty-six patients met our eligibility criteria. The mean age at operation was 31 years (range 18–65). There were 20 males and 16 females. No patients were lost to follow-up. The ankle tightrope maintained satisfactory reduction in the ankle mortise in 97% of cases. Of these 35 successfully treated cases, no evidence of re-displacement on follow-up radiographs of the syndesmotic complex was observed at an average of 10.8 months (range 6–12). Post-operative mean medial clear space was 3.1 mm, and mean tibio-fibular overlap was 10.1 mm. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 88.8 (range 67–98) at a mean follow-up of 14 months (range 12–26). The overall complication rate was 6% (one failure requiring revision surgery and one medial sided skin irritation requiring removal of suture button). No infections or wound complications occurred.

Conclusion

Tightrope fixation is a safe alternative to screw fixation for syndesmotic complex injuries in Weber C ankle fractures. We have shown that it has low complication rates and a high patient satisfaction.
Literature
1.
Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G (1998) Adult ankle fractures—An increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):43–47CrossRefPubMed
2.
Lalli TAJ, Matthews LJ, Hanselman AE, Hubbard DF, Bramer MA, Santrock RD (2015) Economic impact of syndesmosis hardware removal. The Foot 25(3):131–133CrossRefPubMed
3.
Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58(3):356–357CrossRef
4.
Wang C, Ma X, Wang X, Huang J, Zhang C, Chen L (2013) Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Orthop 37(9):1755–1763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Teszer C, MacLeod MD (2010) Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):2–6CrossRefPubMed
6.
Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2006) Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27(10):788–792CrossRefPubMed
7.
Van Vlijmen N, Denk K, Van Kampen A, Jaarsma RL (2015) Long-term results after ankle syndesmosis injuries. Orthopaedics 38(11):1001–1006CrossRef
8.
Hakkalamani S, Prasanna VK, Meda K (2007) Syndysmotic screw removal in Weber ‘C’ ankle fractures. Inj Extra 38(1):14CrossRef
9.
Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2008) Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex Tightrope: a report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int 29:773–780CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Coetzee JC, Ebeling P (2009) Treatment of syndesmoses disruptions: a prospective, randomized study comparing conventional screw fixation versus TightRope® fiber wire fixation—medium term results. SA Orthop J 8:32–37
12.
Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkilä T, Lepojärvi S, Nortunen S, Ohtonen P, Katisko J, Pakarinen H (2015) A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury 46(6):1119–1126CrossRefPubMed
13.
Den Daas A, van Zuuren WJ, Pelet S, van Noort A, van den Bekerom MPJ (2012) Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 7(3):123–129CrossRef
14.
Olerud C, Molander H (1984) A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103(3):190–194CrossRefPubMed
15.
Nåsell H, Ottosson C, Törnqvist H, Lindé J, Ponzer S (2011) The impact of smoking on complications after operatively treated ankle fractures—a follow-up study of 906 patients. J Orthop Trauma 25(12):748–755CrossRefPubMed
16.
Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA (2011) Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 32:250–256CrossRefPubMed
17.
Qamar F, Kadakia A, Venkateswaran B (2011) An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 50:762–765CrossRefPubMed
18.
Rigby RB, Cottom JM (2013) Does the Arthrex TightRope® provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(5):563–567CrossRefPubMed
19.
Storey P, Gadd RJ, Blundell C (2012) Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int 33(09):717–721CrossRefPubMed
20.
Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E (2005) Suture-button syndesmosis fixation—accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:207–212CrossRef
21.
Forsythe K, Freedman KB, Stover MD, Patwardhan AG (2008) Comparison of a novel FiberWire-button construct versus metallic screw fixation in a syndesmotic injury model. Foot Ankle Int 29(1):49–54CrossRefPubMed
22.
Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N (2012) Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Inj J Care Inj 43(6):838–842CrossRef
23.
Willmott HJS, Singh B, David LA (2009) Outcome and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Inj J Care Inj 40(11):1204–1206CrossRef
24.
Seyhan M, Donmez F, Mahirogullari M, Cakmak S, Mutlu S, Guler O (2015) Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures. Injury 46(2):19–23CrossRef
25.
Schepers T (2012) Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop 36(6):1199–1206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bédard L, van den Bekerom MP, Glazebrook M, Pelet S (2015) A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. J Orthop Trauma 29(5):216–223CrossRefPubMed
27.
Westermann RW, Rungprai C, Goetz JE, Femino J, Amendola A, Phisitkul P (2014) The effect of suture-button fixation on simulated syndesmotic malreduction: a cadaveric study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(20):1732–1738CrossRef
28.
Metadata
Title
Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series
Authors
Amarjit Anand
Ran Wei
Akash Patel
Vikas Vedi
Garth Allardice
Bobby Singh Anand
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1882-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 4/2017 Go to the issue

General Review • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY

Silver-coated megaprostheses: review of the literature

Technical Note • KNEE - ARTHROSCOPY

A novel suture technique using the FasT-Fix combined with Ultrabraid for pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root tear

Original Article • WRIST - FRACTURE

Carpal scaphoid non-union treatment: a retrospective trial comparing simple retrograde percutaneous screw fixation versus percutaneous screw fixation plus pulsed electromagnetic fields (Physiostim®)

Original Article • SPINE - CERVICAL

Adjacent segment pathology: natural history or effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A 10-year follow-up radiological multicenter study using an evaluation scale of the ageing spine

Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY

Blood metal ion concentrations in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

Letter to the Editor • FRACTURES - TRAUMA

Reply to “Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for closed distal tibial fractures: a consecutive study based on 25 patients” by Bhat R, Wani MM, Rshid S, Akhter N in Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Apr; 25(3): 563–568