Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 8/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Original Article

Timing of surgery in traumatic spinal cord injury: a national, multidisciplinary survey

Authors: P. V. ter Wengel, R. E. Feller, A. Stadhouder, D. Verbaan, F. C. Oner, J. C. Goslings, W. P. Vandertop

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The optimal surgical timeframe for neurological recovery in traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) still remains unknown. Recent guidelines have recommended performing surgery within 24 h for all patients with tSCI regardless of initial neurological deficit. It remains unclear whether patients with complete, incomplete tSCI, or traumatic central cord injury (TCCI) will experience the same degree of improvement after urgent surgical intervention. We investigated if the severity of initial neurological injury influenced surgeons on their decision-making of surgical timing in tSCI.

Methods

With a web-based survey, we investigated the current opinion in The Netherlands on timing of surgical decompression and stabilization, depending on the initial degree of neurological injury.

Results

Surgeons prefer to perform more urgent surgery for incomplete tSCI compared to complete tSCI. In addition, 43% of patients with complete tSCI are not preferably operated within the recommended 24 h. Even though TCCI is the most common form of incomplete tSCI, these patients are preferably managed less urgently than patients with other types of incomplete tSCI.

Conclusion

The severity of initial neurological injury seems to play an important role in the urgency of surgical timing for tSCI. A substantial number of patients with complete tSCI are not preferably treated within the recommended surgical timeframe, while patients with incomplete tSCI are preferably operated far more urgent than recommended in the current guidelines.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Post MWM, van Leeuwen CMC (2012) Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord 50(5):382–389CrossRefPubMed Post MWM, van Leeuwen CMC (2012) Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord 50(5):382–389CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Fehlings MG et al (2012) Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the surgical timing in acute spinal cord injury study (STASCIS). PLoS One 7(2):e32037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fehlings MG et al (2012) Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the surgical timing in acute spinal cord injury study (STASCIS). PLoS One 7(2):e32037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Bourassa-Moreau E et al (2016) Do patients with complete spinal cord injury benefit from early surgical decompression? Analysis of neurological improvement in a prospective cohort study. J Neurotrauma 33(3):301–306CrossRefPubMed Bourassa-Moreau E et al (2016) Do patients with complete spinal cord injury benefit from early surgical decompression? Analysis of neurological improvement in a prospective cohort study. J Neurotrauma 33(3):301–306CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Burke JF et al (2016) 182 ultra-early (< 12 hours) decompression improves recovery after spinal cord injury compared to early (12–24 hours) decompression. Neurosurgery 63(Suppl 1):172CrossRef Burke JF et al (2016) 182 ultra-early (< 12 hours) decompression improves recovery after spinal cord injury compared to early (12–24 hours) decompression. Neurosurgery 63(Suppl 1):172CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Biglari B et al (2016) Does surgical treatment within 4 hours after trauma have an influence on neurological remission in patients with acute spinal cord injury? Ther Clin Risk Manag 12:1339–1346CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biglari B et al (2016) Does surgical treatment within 4 hours after trauma have an influence on neurological remission in patients with acute spinal cord injury? Ther Clin Risk Manag 12:1339–1346CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Jug M et al (2015) Neurological recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury is superior if surgical decompression and instrumented fusion are performed within 8 hours versus 8 to 24 hours after injury: a single center experience. J Neurotrauma 32(18):1385–1392CrossRefPubMed Jug M et al (2015) Neurological recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury is superior if surgical decompression and instrumented fusion are performed within 8 hours versus 8 to 24 hours after injury: a single center experience. J Neurotrauma 32(18):1385–1392CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Grassner L et al (2016) Early decompression (< 8 h) after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury improves functional outcome as assessed by spinal cord independence measure after one year. J Neurotrauma 33(18):1658–1666CrossRefPubMed Grassner L et al (2016) Early decompression (< 8 h) after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury improves functional outcome as assessed by spinal cord independence measure after one year. J Neurotrauma 33(18):1658–1666CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wilson JR et al (2016) 181 guidelines for the management of patients with spinal cord injury: the optimal timing of decompression. Neurosurgery 63(Suppl 1):172CrossRef Wilson JR et al (2016) 181 guidelines for the management of patients with spinal cord injury: the optimal timing of decompression. Neurosurgery 63(Suppl 1):172CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fehlings MG et al (2017) A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury and central cord syndrome: recommendations on the timing (≤ 24 hours versus > 24 hours) of decompressive surgery. Global Spine J 7(3 suppl):195S–202SCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fehlings MG et al (2017) A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury and central cord syndrome: recommendations on the timing (≤ 24 hours versus > 24 hours) of decompressive surgery. Global Spine J 7(3 suppl):195S–202SCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Maynard FMJ et al (1997) International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 35(5):266–274CrossRefPubMed Maynard FMJ et al (1997) International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 35(5):266–274CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fehlings MG, Rabin D, Sears W, Cadotte DW, Aarabi B (2010) Current practice in the timing of surgical intervention in spinal cord injury. Spine 35(21 Suppl):S166–S173CrossRefPubMed Fehlings MG, Rabin D, Sears W, Cadotte DW, Aarabi B (2010) Current practice in the timing of surgical intervention in spinal cord injury. Spine 35(21 Suppl):S166–S173CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Glennie RA et al (2017) An analysis of ideal and actual time to surgery after traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spinal Cord 55(6):618–623CrossRefPubMed Glennie RA et al (2017) An analysis of ideal and actual time to surgery after traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spinal Cord 55(6):618–623CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Werndle MC et al (2012) Variability in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury in the United Kingdom: results of a national survey. J Neurotrauma 29(5):880–888CrossRefPubMed Werndle MC et al (2012) Variability in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury in the United Kingdom: results of a national survey. J Neurotrauma 29(5):880–888CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Samuel AM et al (2015) Analysis of delays to surgery for cervical spinal cord injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(13):992–1000CrossRef Samuel AM et al (2015) Analysis of delays to surgery for cervical spinal cord injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(13):992–1000CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Anderson KK et al (2015) Optimal timing of surgical decompression for acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurgery 77(Suppl 4):S15–S32CrossRefPubMed Anderson KK et al (2015) Optimal timing of surgical decompression for acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurgery 77(Suppl 4):S15–S32CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lenehan B, Fisher CG, Vaccaro A, Fehlings M, Aarabi B, Dvorak MF (2010) The urgency of surgical decompression in acute central cord injuries with spondylosis and without instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(21 Suppl):S180–S186CrossRef Lenehan B, Fisher CG, Vaccaro A, Fehlings M, Aarabi B, Dvorak MF (2010) The urgency of surgical decompression in acute central cord injuries with spondylosis and without instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(21 Suppl):S180–S186CrossRef
18.
go back to reference van Middendorp JJ, Hosman AJF, Doi SAR (2013) The effects of the timing of spinal surgery after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma 30(21):1781–1794CrossRefPubMed van Middendorp JJ, Hosman AJF, Doi SAR (2013) The effects of the timing of spinal surgery after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma 30(21):1781–1794CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference van Middendorp JJ (2012) Letter to the editor regarding: ‘Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS)’. Spine J 12(6):540CrossRefPubMed van Middendorp JJ (2012) Letter to the editor regarding: ‘Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS)’. Spine J 12(6):540CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Toole JEO (2014) Timing of surgery after cervical spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg 82(7–8):1–2 Toole JEO (2014) Timing of surgery after cervical spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg 82(7–8):1–2
21.
go back to reference Holland CM, Mazur MD, Bisson EF, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT (2017) Trends in patient care for traumatic spinal injuries in the United States: a national inpatient sample study of the correlations with patient outcomes from 2001 to 2012. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(24):1923–1929CrossRef Holland CM, Mazur MD, Bisson EF, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT (2017) Trends in patient care for traumatic spinal injuries in the United States: a national inpatient sample study of the correlations with patient outcomes from 2001 to 2012. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(24):1923–1929CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vaccaro AR et al (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(23):2028–2037CrossRef Vaccaro AR et al (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(23):2028–2037CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kalsi-Ryan S, Wilson J, Yang JM, Fehlings MG (2014) Neurological grading in traumatic spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg 82(3–4):509–518CrossRefPubMed Kalsi-Ryan S, Wilson J, Yang JM, Fehlings MG (2014) Neurological grading in traumatic spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg 82(3–4):509–518CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Rutges JPHJ, Kwon BK, Heran M, Ailon T, Street JT, Dvorak MF (2017) A prospective serial MRI study following acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J 26(9):2324–2332CrossRefPubMed Rutges JPHJ, Kwon BK, Heran M, Ailon T, Street JT, Dvorak MF (2017) A prospective serial MRI study following acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J 26(9):2324–2332CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Timing of surgery in traumatic spinal cord injury: a national, multidisciplinary survey
Authors
P. V. ter Wengel
R. E. Feller
A. Stadhouder
D. Verbaan
F. C. Oner
J. C. Goslings
W. P. Vandertop
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5551-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

European Spine Journal 8/2018 Go to the issue