Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Scoliosis | Original Article

Radiation-free measurement tools to evaluate sagittal parameters in AIS patients: a reliability and validity study

Authors: Anne Tabard-Fougère, Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure, Amira Dhouib, Raimonda Valaikaite, Stéphane Armand, Romain Dayer

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the intra-rater reliability and validity in comparison with the two-dimensional radiography (XR) of inclinometer (INCL) and rasterstereography (RAST) for assessing spinal sagittal angles of AIS patients.

Methods

Fifty-one AIS patients (13.5 (2.0) years, girls = 32 (63%), Cobb angle = 23.0 (17.4)°) were included in this study. Three repeated measurements of thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were evaluated using the INCL and RAST by the same operator on the same day of the XR examination. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate the reliability of the INCL and RAST systems. Additionally, Pearson coefficients were computed between the XR and INCL systems and between the XR and RAST systems.

Results

Reliability of each radiation-free system was excellent (ICC > 0.75 for INCL and RAST) for both the TK and LL parameters. The Pearson coefficients between each of the radiation-free systems and the XR were high to moderate for the TK (0.50 < RTK < 0.75 for INCL and RAST), high to moderate for the LL as measured with the RAST (0.50 < RLL < 0.75 for RAST) and low for the LL as measured with the INCL (RLL < 0.50 for INCL).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that for the RAST and INCL in AIS patients, there was (1) an excellent reliability for the TK and LL, (2) a high-to-moderate validity for measuring the TK and (3) a moderate and low validity for measuring the LL, respectively. These radiation-free systems could be used for the clinical follow-up of AIS patients for the evaluation of the TK.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yawn BP (2000) Reassessing scoliosis screening: new definitions, new criteria. Adm Radiol J 19:14–17PubMed Yawn BP (2000) Reassessing scoliosis screening: new definitions, new criteria. Adm Radiol J 19:14–17PubMed
2.
go back to reference Knott P, Sturm P, Lonner B et al (2016) Multicenter comparison of 3D spinal measurements using surface topography with those from conventional radiography. Spine Deform 4:98–103CrossRefPubMed Knott P, Sturm P, Lonner B et al (2016) Multicenter comparison of 3D spinal measurements using surface topography with those from conventional radiography. Spine Deform 4:98–103CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL et al (1998) Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 18:222–226PubMed Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL et al (1998) Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 18:222–226PubMed
4.
go back to reference Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS et al (2010) Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders. Radiat Res 174:83–90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS et al (2010) Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders. Radiat Res 174:83–90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Simony A, Hansen EJ, Christensen SB et al (2016) Incidence of cancer in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated 25 years previously. Eur Spine J 25:3366–3370CrossRefPubMed Simony A, Hansen EJ, Christensen SB et al (2016) Incidence of cancer in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated 25 years previously. Eur Spine J 25:3366–3370CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Barrett E, McCreesh K, Lewis J (2014) Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: a systematic review. Man Ther 19:10–17CrossRefPubMed Barrett E, McCreesh K, Lewis J (2014) Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: a systematic review. Man Ther 19:10–17CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Van Blommestein AS (2012) Reliability of measuring thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle and straight leg raise with an inclinometer. Open Spine J 4:10–15CrossRef Van Blommestein AS (2012) Reliability of measuring thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle and straight leg raise with an inclinometer. Open Spine J 4:10–15CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lewis JS, Valentine RE (2010) Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in subjects with and without shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lewis JS, Valentine RE (2010) Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in subjects with and without shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Mohokum M, Mendoza S, Udo W et al (2010) Reproducibility of rasterstereography for kyphotic and lordotic angles, trunk length, and trunk inclination: a reliability study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1353–1358CrossRef Mohokum M, Mendoza S, Udo W et al (2010) Reproducibility of rasterstereography for kyphotic and lordotic angles, trunk length, and trunk inclination: a reliability study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1353–1358CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tabard-Fougère A, Bonnefoy-Mazure A, Hanquinet S et al (2017) Validity and reliability of spine rasterstereography in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:98–105CrossRef Tabard-Fougère A, Bonnefoy-Mazure A, Hanquinet S et al (2017) Validity and reliability of spine rasterstereography in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:98–105CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J, Newton PO (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2284–2289CrossRef Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J, Newton PO (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2284–2289CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Poichotte E (2005) Mesure des amplitudes articulaires. L’inclinomètre dans la pratique courante [Book in French]. ISOMEM, Paris Poichotte E (2005) Mesure des amplitudes articulaires. L’inclinomètre dans la pratique courante [Book in French]. ISOMEM, Paris
15.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed
16.
18.
go back to reference Zaina F, Donzelli S, Lusini M, Negrini S (2012) How to measure kyphosis in everyday clinical practice: a reliability study on different methods. Stud Health Technol Inform 176:264–267PubMed Zaina F, Donzelli S, Lusini M, Negrini S (2012) How to measure kyphosis in everyday clinical practice: a reliability study on different methods. Stud Health Technol Inform 176:264–267PubMed
19.
go back to reference Fortin C, Feldman DE, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2010) Validity of a quantitative clinical measurement tool of trunk posture in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E988–E994CrossRef Fortin C, Feldman DE, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2010) Validity of a quantitative clinical measurement tool of trunk posture in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E988–E994CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frerich JM, Hertzler K, Knott P, Mardjetko S (2012) Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop J 6:261–265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frerich JM, Hertzler K, Knott P, Mardjetko S (2012) Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop J 6:261–265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Drerup B, Hierholzer E (1985) Objective determination of anatomical landmarks on the body surface: measurement of the vertebra prominens from surface curvature. J Biomech 18:467–474CrossRefPubMed Drerup B, Hierholzer E (1985) Objective determination of anatomical landmarks on the body surface: measurement of the vertebra prominens from surface curvature. J Biomech 18:467–474CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Degenhardt B, Starks Z, Bhatia S, Franklin GA (2017) Appraisal of the DIERS method for calculating postural measurements: an observational study. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:1–11CrossRef Degenhardt B, Starks Z, Bhatia S, Franklin GA (2017) Appraisal of the DIERS method for calculating postural measurements: an observational study. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:1–11CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Evcik D, Yücel A (2003) Lumbar lordosis in acute and chronic low back pain patients. Rheumatol Int 23:163–165CrossRefPubMed Evcik D, Yücel A (2003) Lumbar lordosis in acute and chronic low back pain patients. Rheumatol Int 23:163–165CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Polly DW, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA et al (1996) Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1530–1535 (discussion 1535-6) CrossRef Polly DW, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA et al (1996) Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1530–1535 (discussion 1535-6) CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zheng R, Hill D, Hedden D, Moreau M, LE Southon S (2018) Assessment of curve progression on children with idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasound imaging method. Eur Spine J 27:2114–2119CrossRefPubMed Zheng R, Hill D, Hedden D, Moreau M, LE Southon S (2018) Assessment of curve progression on children with idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasound imaging method. Eur Spine J 27:2114–2119CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Zheng R, Hill D, Hedden D, Mahood J, Moreau M, LE Southon S (2018) Factors influencing spinal curvature measurements on ultrasound images for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PLoS ONE 13:e0198792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zheng R, Hill D, Hedden D, Mahood J, Moreau M, LE Southon S (2018) Factors influencing spinal curvature measurements on ultrasound images for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PLoS ONE 13:e0198792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Zheng Y-P, Lee TT-Y, Lai KK-L et al (2016) A reliability and validity study for scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zheng Y-P, Lee TT-Y, Lai KK-L et al (2016) A reliability and validity study for scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Komeili A, Westover L, Parent EC, El-Rich MAS (2015) Monitoring for idiopathic scoliosis curve progression using surface topography asymmetry analysis of the torso in adolescents. Spine J 15:743–751CrossRefPubMed Komeili A, Westover L, Parent EC, El-Rich MAS (2015) Monitoring for idiopathic scoliosis curve progression using surface topography asymmetry analysis of the torso in adolescents. Spine J 15:743–751CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Radiation-free measurement tools to evaluate sagittal parameters in AIS patients: a reliability and validity study
Authors
Anne Tabard-Fougère
Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure
Amira Dhouib
Raimonda Valaikaite
Stéphane Armand
Romain Dayer
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-05875-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

European Spine Journal 3/2019 Go to the issue