Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Assessment of curve progression on children with idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasound imaging method

Authors: Rui Zheng, Doug Hill, Douglas Hedden, Marc Moreau, Sarah Southon, Edmond Lou

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the threshold of the curve difference on ultrasound measurement relative to the previous radiographic measurements to detect curves progression in children who have idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

Methods

Two hundred children with IS (F:170, M:30; mean age: 14.6 ± 1.9) were recruited from a single center. A retrospective study on comparing the current ultrasound measurements with the previous radiographic measurements with threshold values from 3° to 8° to detect curve progression was conducted. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, accuracy (ACC), and odd ratio (OR) were calculated to determine the optimal threshold value of the curve differences between ultrasound and previous radiographic measurement.

Results

Both thresholds of 4° and 5° for curve difference from ultrasound scans presented the sensitivities ≥ 0.90 and specificities ≥ 0.85, and can reduce by 73 and 79% of radiographs on the studied subjects, respectively. Especially, for 4° threshold, the negative likelihood ratio (LR−) was only 0.08, which indicated that there is only 8% probability that the subject has progressed if the US measurement detected non-progression.

Conclusions

The ultrasound imaging method can be applied to identify curve progression in children with IS. Four degree is the preferred threshold value to detect the curve which had progressed, since it also had the lower rate of undetected progressed cases (false negatives).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bunnell WP (1988) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 229:20–25 Bunnell WP (1988) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 229:20–25
3.
go back to reference Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 5:261–275 Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 5:261–275
4.
go back to reference Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:320–327CrossRefPubMed Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:320–327CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1061–1071CrossRefPubMed Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1061–1071CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bunnell WP (1986) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine 11:773–776CrossRefPubMed Bunnell WP (1986) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine 11:773–776CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Soucacos PN, Zacharis K, Gelalis J, Soultanis K, Kalos N, Beris A et al (1998) Assessment of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7:270–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Soucacos PN, Zacharis K, Gelalis J, Soultanis K, Kalos N, Beris A et al (1998) Assessment of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7:270–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS, Boice JD (1989) Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X-rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1307–1312CrossRefPubMed Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS, Boice JD (1989) Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X-rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1307–1312CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Morin Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE et al (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the US scoliosis cohort study. Spine 25:2052–2063CrossRef Morin Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE et al (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the US scoliosis cohort study. Spine 25:2052–2063CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dougls G Altman, David Machin, Trevor N Bryant, Martin J Gardner (2000) Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 2nd ed. BMJ Dougls G Altman, David Machin, Trevor N Bryant, Martin J Gardner (2000) Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 2nd ed. BMJ
23.
go back to reference Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1381–1387CrossRefPubMed Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1381–1387CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV (1996) Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer. Spine 21:1661–1666CrossRefPubMed Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV (1996) Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer. Spine 21:1661–1666CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine 26:E55–E63CrossRefPubMed Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine 26:E55–E63CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Lee DH, Cho JH (2017) Progression of trunk imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a thoracolumbar/lumbar curve: is it predictable at the initial visit? J Neurosurg Pediatr 20(5):450–455CrossRefPubMed Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Lee DH, Cho JH (2017) Progression of trunk imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a thoracolumbar/lumbar curve: is it predictable at the initial visit? J Neurosurg Pediatr 20(5):450–455CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Guo J, Liu Z, Lv F, Zhu Z, Qian B, Zhang X, Lin X, Sun X, Qiu X (2012) Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21(10):2050–2058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guo J, Liu Z, Lv F, Zhu Z, Qian B, Zhang X, Lin X, Sun X, Qiu X (2012) Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21(10):2050–2058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Assessment of curve progression on children with idiopathic scoliosis using ultrasound imaging method
Authors
Rui Zheng
Doug Hill
Douglas Hedden
Marc Moreau
Sarah Southon
Edmond Lou
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5457-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

European Spine Journal 9/2018 Go to the issue