Top

European Spine Journal

Published in:

01-09-2017 | Original Article

Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location

Authors: William J. Anderst, Tyler West, William F. Donaldson III, Joon Y. Lee

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2017

Abstract

Purpose

Bone mineral density (BMD) measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has been shown to correlate with bone mechanical properties. Knowledge of BMD within specific anatomic regions of the spine is valuable to surgeons who must secure instrumentation to the vertebrae, to medical device developers who design screws and disc replacements, and to researchers who assign mechanical properties to computational models. The objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize BMD in the cervical spine of young healthy adults.

Methods

QCT was used to determine BMD in the cervical spines of 31 healthy adults (age 20–35). Subject-specific 3D models of each vertebra were created from CT scans, and anatomic regions of interest were identified in each bone (C1: 3 regions; C2: 9 regions, C3–C7: 13 regions). Statistical tests were performed to identify differences in BMD according to vertebral level, anatomic regions within vertebrae, and sex.

Results

BMD varied significantly among vertebral levels and among anatomic regions within each vertebra. Females had higher BMD than males (p = .041) primarily due to higher BMD in the posterior regions of each vertebra.

Conclusions

These data can serve as a baseline to identify BMD changes in older and symptomatic patients. This data set is also the first report of volumetric bone density within different anatomic regions of the atlas and axis of the cervical spine. The finding of higher BMD in females is in agreement with the previous QCT results but contradicts DEXA results that are known to be dependent upon bone size.

Liu F, Cheng J, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Sharma A (2007) In vivo evaluation of dynamic characteristics of the normal, fused, and disc replacement cervical spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(23):2578–2584. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cdf8 CrossRef

Pospiech J, Stolke D, Wilke HJ, Claes LE (1999) Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 44(2):379–384 (discussion 384–375) CrossRefPubMed

Goel VK, Clausen JD (1998) Prediction of load sharing among spinal components of a C5–C6 motion segment using the finite element approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(6):684–691CrossRef

Wolff J (1986) The law of bone remodeling (trans: Maquet P, Furlong R). Springer, BerlinCrossRef

Curylo LJ, Lindsey RW, Doherty BJ, LeBlanc A (1996) Segmental variations of bone mineral density in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(3):319–322CrossRef

Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Wilson CR, Sances A Jr (1990) In vitro biomechanical study of female geriatric cervical vertebral bodies. J Biomed Eng 12(2):97–101CrossRefPubMed

Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Stemper BD, Baisden JL, Aktay R, Shender BS, Paskoff G, Laud P (2006) Trabecular bone density of male human cervical and lumbar vertebrae. Bone 39(2):336–344. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.01.160 CrossRefPubMed

Anderst WJ, Thorhauer ED, Lee JY, Donaldson WF, Kang JD (2011) Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 11(7):659–667. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.05.007 CrossRef

Zhuang XM, Yu BS, Zheng ZM, Zhang JF, Lu WW (2010) Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(19):E925–E931. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c5fb21 CrossRef

10.

Thiele OC, Eckhardt C, Linke B, Schneider E, Lill CA (2007) Factors affecting the stability of screws in human cortical osteoporotic bone: a cadaver study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(5):701–705. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18504 CrossRef

11.

Ryken TC, Clausen JD, Traynelis VC, Goel VK (1995) Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws. J Neurosurg 83(2):325–329CrossRefPubMed

12.

Zhang X, Ordway NR, Tan R, Rim BC, Fayyazi AH (2008) Correlation of ProDisc-C failure strength with cervical bone mineral content and endplate strength. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(6):400–405. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318157d382 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Jiang Y, Zhao J, Augat P, Ouyang X, Lu Y, Majumdar S, Genant HK (1998) Trabecular bone mineral and calculated structure of human bone specimens scanned by peripheral quantitative computed tomography: relation to biomechanical properties. J Bone Miner Res 13(11):1783–1790. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.11.1783 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ordway NR, Lu YM, Zhang X, Cheng CC, Fang H, Fayyazi AH (2007) Correlation of cervical endplate strength with CT measured subchondral bone density. Eur Spine J 16(12):2104–2109. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0482-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Goldstein SA (1987) The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech 20(11–12):1055–1061 (pii:0021-9290(87)90023-6) CrossRefPubMed

16.

Oxland TR, Lund T, Jost B, Cripton P, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Nolte LP (1996) The relative importance of vertebral bone density and disc degeneration in spinal flexibility and interbody implant performance. An in vitro study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(22):2558–2569CrossRef

17.

Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Lucke M, Schroder R, Mittlmeier T (2001) Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(9):1028–1037CrossRef

18.

Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Stemper BD, Baisden JL, Aktay R, Shender BS, Paskoff G (2006) Bone mineral density of human female cervical and lumbar spines from quantitative computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(1):73–76 (pii:00007632-200601010-00017) CrossRef

19.

Genant HK, Cann CE, Ettinger B, Gordan GS (1982) Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Ann Intern Med 97(5):699–705CrossRefPubMed

20.

Laval-Jeantet AM, Cann CE, Roger B, Dallant P (1984) A postprocessing dual energy technique for vertebral CT densitometry. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(6):1164–1167CrossRefPubMed

21.

Pitzen T, Schmitz B, Georg T, Barbier D, Beuter T, Steudel WI, Reith W (2004) Variation of endplate thickness in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 13(3):235–240. doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0648-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Ritzel H, Amling M, Posl M, Hahn M, Delling G (1997) The thickness of human vertebral cortical bone and its changes in aging and osteoporosis: a histomorphometric analysis of the complete spinal column from thirty-seven autopsy specimens. J Bone Miner Res 12(1):89–95. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.89 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Tubbs RS, Hallock JD, Radcliff V, Naftel RP, Mortazavi M, Shoja MM, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol AA (2011) Ligaments of the craniocervical junction. J Neurosurg Spine 14(6):697–709. doi:10.3171/2011.1.SPINE10612 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K (1993) Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 18(15):2167–2173CrossRefPubMed

25.

Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Jt Surg 75(9):1298–1307CrossRef

26.

Friedenberg ZB, Miller WT (1963) Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. J Bone Jt Surg 45:1171–1178CrossRef

27.

Iatridis JC, MacLean JJ, Roughley PJ, Alini M (2006) Effects of mechanical loading on intervertebral disc metabolism in vivo. J Bone Jt Surg 88(Suppl 2):41–46. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.01407

28.

Stokes IA, Iatridis JC (2004) Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(23):2724–2732CrossRef

29.

Ellman R, Spatz J, Cloutier A, Palme R, Christiansen BA, Bouxsein ML (2013) Partial reductions in mechanical loading yield proportional changes in bone density, bone architecture, and muscle mass. J Bone Miner Res 28(4):875–885. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1814 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Smith EL, Gilligan C (1996) Dose-response relationship between physical loading and mechanical competence of bone. Bone 18(1 Suppl):455–505PubMed

31.

Michalek AJ, Buckley MR, Bonassar LJ, Cohen I, Iatridis JC (2009) Measurement of local strains in intervertebral disc anulus fibrosus tissue under dynamic shear: contributions of matrix fiber orientation and elastin content. J Biomech 42(14):2279–2285. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.047 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Jarvinen TL, Kannus P, Sievanen H (2003) Estrogen and bone—a reproductive and locomotive perspective. J Bone Miner Res 18(11):1921–1931. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1921 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Havill LM, Mahaney MC, Binkley T, Specker BL (2007) Effects of genes, sex, age, and activity on BMC, bone size, and areal and volumetric BMD. J Bone Miner Res 22(5):737–746. doi:10.1359/jbmr.070213 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7(2):137–145. doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650070204 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Bonnick S (1998) Bone densitometry in clinical practice: application and interpretation. Humana, Totowa

36.

Anderst WJ, Donaldson WF 3rd, Lee JY, Kang JD (2015) Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading. J Biomech. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.049

37.

Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T (2012) Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 21(8):1492–1498. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2167-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Ammann P, Rizzoli R (2003) Bone strength and its determinants. Osteoporos Int 14(Suppl 3):S13–S18. doi:10.1007/s00198-002-1345-4 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Thaler M, Hartmann S, Gstottner M, Lechner R, Gabl M, Bach C (2013) Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 22(4):759–765. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2594-3 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Gluer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M (1997) Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. J Bone Miner Res 12(5):697–711. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.5.697 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Budoff MJ, Hamirani YS, Gao YL, Ismaeel H, Flores FR, Child J, Carson S, Nee JN, Mao S (2010) Measurement of thoracic bone mineral density with quantitative CT. Radiology 257(2):434–440. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100132 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Budoff MJ, Khairallah W, Li D, Gao YL, Ismaeel H, Flores F, Child J, Carson S, Mao SS (2012) Trabecular bone mineral density measurement using thoracic and lumbar quantitative computed tomography. Acad Radiol 19(2):179–183. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.006 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Zink PM (1996) Performance of ventral spondylodesis screws in cervical vertebrae of varying bone mineral density. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(1):45–52CrossRef

44.

Eysel P, Schwitalle M, Oberstein A, Rompe JD, Hopf C, Kullmer K (1998) Preoperative estimation of screw fixation strength in vertebral bodies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(2):174–180CrossRef

45.

Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D (1996) Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 118(3):391–398CrossRefPubMed

46.

Ryken TC, Goel VK, Clausen JD, Traynelis VC (1995) Assessment of unicortical and bicortical fixation in a quasistatic cadaveric model. Role of bone mineral density and screw torque. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(17):1861–1867CrossRef

47.

Heller JG, Estes BT, Zaouali M, Diop A (1996) Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78(9):1315–1321CrossRef

Title: Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location
Authors: William J. Anderst
Tyler West
William F. Donaldson III
Joon Y. Lee
Publication date: 01-09-2017
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5119-2

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Atypical presentation of a cervical synovial cyst

Trends analysis of surgical procedures for cervical degenerative disc disease and myelopathy in patients with tobacco use disorder

Classification and regression tree model for predicting tracheostomy in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury

Occipitocervical inclination: new radiographic parameter of neutral occipitocervical position

Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study

Announcement (Issue 9), September 2017