Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2004

01-05-2004 | Original Article

Variation of endplate thickness in the cervical spine

Authors: T. Pitzen, B. Schmitz, T. Georg, D. Barbier, T. Beuter, W. I. Steudel, W. Reith

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate possible variation of thickness of the cervical spine endplate with respect to endplate orientation (superior or inferior endplate) and level distribution (C4–C7). Six human cervical spine segments C4–C7 were used to create six specimen of C4, C5, C6, and C7, respectively. The bony endplates of each vertebra were cleaned carefully from disc tissue without damaging the endplates. Six endplates with severe degenerative changes were excluded from the study. The posterior elements were removed, and a midaxial cut using a bone saw was performed through each vertebral body, thus producing a superior and inferior half. Each half-vertebra was then glued onto a piece of wood with the endplate oriented upwards and horizontally. For each specimen, four computed tomography scans were taken and thickness of the endplate was measured at five points on each scan perpendicular to the midaxial cut. Factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffe-test were used to detect significant differences. All peripheral regions were significantly thicker than the central point of the endplate if all measuring points were considered for statistical analysis, regardless of scan, endplate orientation or level (Scheffe-test, P<0.001). In both superior and inferior endplates, peripheral areas were thicker than the central region (Scheffe-test, P<0.001). For all levels, the endplate within the peripheral regions was thicker than within the central region and the difference reached significance for the superior and inferior endplate of C4, C5, and C6 and the inferior endplate of C7 (Scheffe-test, P<0.05). The peripheral regions of the cervical spine endplate are usually thicker than its central region, regardless of endplate orientation and level (C4, C5, C6, C7) distribution.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Böhler J, Gaudernack T (1980) Anterior plate stabilization for fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma 20:203–205PubMed Böhler J, Gaudernack T (1980) Anterior plate stabilization for fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma 20:203–205PubMed
2.
go back to reference Caspar W (1984) Die ventrale interkorporale Stabilisierung mit der HWS—Trapez-Osteosyntheseplatte. Indikationen, Technik, Ergebnisse. Orthop Praxis 12:981–988 Caspar W (1984) Die ventrale interkorporale Stabilisierung mit der HWS—Trapez-Osteosyntheseplatte. Indikationen, Technik, Ergebnisse. Orthop Praxis 12:981–988
3.
go back to reference Caspar W, Barbier D, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25:491–502PubMed Caspar W, Barbier D, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25:491–502PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured discs. J Neurosurg 15:602–617 Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured discs. J Neurosurg 15:602–617
5.
go back to reference De Olivera JC (1987) Anterior plate fixation of traumatic lesions of the lower cervical spine. Spine 12:324–331PubMed De Olivera JC (1987) Anterior plate fixation of traumatic lesions of the lower cervical spine. Spine 12:324–331PubMed
6.
go back to reference Fernyhough FC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM (1992) Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 17:1474–1480PubMed Fernyhough FC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM (1992) Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 17:1474–1480PubMed
7.
go back to reference Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF (2001) Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26:889–896PubMed Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF (2001) Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26:889–896PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hollowell JP, Vollmer DG, Wilson CR, Pintar FA, Yoganandan N (1996) Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate? Spine 21:1032–1036CrossRefPubMed Hollowell JP, Vollmer DG, Wilson CR, Pintar FA, Yoganandan N (1996) Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate? Spine 21:1032–1036CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kuhn DA, Moreland MS (1986) Complications following iliac crest bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 209:224–226 Kuhn DA, Moreland MS (1986) Complications following iliac crest bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 209:224–226
10.
go back to reference Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Booth RE (1984) Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts: a review of complications and techniques. Spine 14:1324–1331 Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Booth RE (1984) Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts: a review of complications and techniques. Spine 14:1324–1331
11.
go back to reference Lim TH, Kwon H, Jeon CH, Kim JG, Sokolowski M, Natarajan R, An HS, Andersson GB (2001) Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine 26:951–956CrossRefPubMed Lim TH, Kwon H, Jeon CH, Kim JG, Sokolowski M, Natarajan R, An HS, Andersson GB (2001) Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine 26:951–956CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Oxland TR, Grant JP, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG (2003) Effects of endplate removal on the structural properties of the lower lumbar vertebral bodies. Spine 28:771–777CrossRefPubMed Oxland TR, Grant JP, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG (2003) Effects of endplate removal on the structural properties of the lower lumbar vertebral bodies. Spine 28:771–777CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Panjabi MM, Chen NC, Shin EK, Wang JL (2001) The cortical shell architecture of human cervical vertebral bodies. Spine 26:2478–2484CrossRefPubMed Panjabi MM, Chen NC, Shin EK, Wang JL (2001) The cortical shell architecture of human cervical vertebral bodies. Spine 26:2478–2484CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pitzen TR, Matthis D, Barbier DD, Steudel WI (2002) Initial stability of cervical spine fixation: prediction of a finite element model. J Neurosurg 97 (Suppl 1):128–134PubMed Pitzen TR, Matthis D, Barbier DD, Steudel WI (2002) Initial stability of cervical spine fixation: prediction of a finite element model. J Neurosurg 97 (Suppl 1):128–134PubMed
15.
go back to reference Silva MJ, Wang C, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC (1994) Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human lumbar vertebral shell and endplate. Bone 15:409–414PubMed Silva MJ, Wang C, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC (1994) Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human lumbar vertebral shell and endplate. Bone 15:409–414PubMed
16.
go back to reference Smith GW, Robinson RA (1985) The treatment of cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40:607–624 Smith GW, Robinson RA (1985) The treatment of cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40:607–624
17.
go back to reference Steffen T, Tsantrizos A, Aebi M (2000) Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs. Spine 25:1077–1084CrossRefPubMed Steffen T, Tsantrizos A, Aebi M (2000) Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs. Spine 25:1077–1084CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Summers BN, Eisenstein SM (1989) Donor site pain from the ilium: a complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:677–680PubMed Summers BN, Eisenstein SM (1989) Donor site pain from the ilium: a complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:677–680PubMed
19.
go back to reference Tippits R, Apfelbaum RI (1989) Anterior cervical fusion with the Caspar instrumentation system. Neurosurgery 22:1008–1013 Tippits R, Apfelbaum RI (1989) Anterior cervical fusion with the Caspar instrumentation system. Neurosurgery 22:1008–1013
20.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Claes L (2000) Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement. Eur Spine J 9:410–416CrossRefPubMed Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Claes L (2000) Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement. Eur Spine J 9:410–416CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Goetz C, Claes L (2000) Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation of a new cervical fusion cage. Spine 25:2762–2770CrossRefPubMed Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Goetz C, Claes L (2000) Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation of a new cervical fusion cage. Spine 25:2762–2770CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Variation of endplate thickness in the cervical spine
Authors
T. Pitzen
B. Schmitz
T. Georg
D. Barbier
T. Beuter
W. I. Steudel
W. Reith
Publication date
01-05-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2004
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0648-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2004

European Spine Journal 3/2004 Go to the issue