Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 4/2017

01-10-2017 | Ideas and Technical Innovations

Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study

Authors: Andrea Luca, Claudia Ottardi, Alessio Lovi, Marco Brayda-Bruno, Tomaso Villa, Fabio Galbusera

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Study design

The investigation was based on finite-element simulations.

Objective

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is an effective but technical demanding surgical technique, associated with a high risk of rod failure. The present study aims at investigating the role of the anterior support in combination with PSO, with a numerical comparative analysis.

Methods

An osteotomy was simulated at the L3 level of a lumbosacral spine. An implantation of various combinations of devices for the anterior (1 or 2 cages of different material) and posterior stabilization (1 or 2 rods) was then performed. ROM, loads, and stresses acting on the rods were calculated.

Results

A 4–8% reduction of the ROM was obtained introducing one or two cages in the instrumented model. However, the anterior support had only a minor influence on the ROM. The load on the posterior instrumentation decreased up to 8% using one cage and about 15% with two anterior devices. A 20–30% reduction of the stresses on the rods was calculated inserting one cage and up to 50% using two cages. Following the introduction of the anterior support, the greatest stress reduction was observed in the model having two cages and spinal fixators with two rods.

Conclusions

The use of cages is crucial to ensure anterior support and decrease loads and stresses on the posterior instrumentation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berjano P, Aebi M (2015) Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities. Eur Spine J 24(1S):49–57CrossRef Berjano P, Aebi M (2015) Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities. Eur Spine J 24(1S):49–57CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Luca A, Lovi A, Galbusera F, Brayda-Bruno M (2014) Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques. Eur Spine J 23(6S):610–615CrossRefPubMed Luca A, Lovi A, Galbusera F, Brayda-Bruno M (2014) Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques. Eur Spine J 23(6S):610–615CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Enercan M, Ozturk C, Kahraman S, Sarer M, Hamzaoglu A, Alanay A (2013) Osteotomies/spinal column resections in adult deformity. Eur Spine J 22(2S):254–264CrossRef Enercan M, Ozturk C, Kahraman S, Sarer M, Hamzaoglu A, Alanay A (2013) Osteotomies/spinal column resections in adult deformity. Eur Spine J 22(2S):254–264CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(3):454–463CrossRefPubMed Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(3):454–463CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim YC, Lenke LG, Hyun SJ, Lee JH, Koester LA, Blanke KM (2014) Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision. Spine 39(21):1817–1828CrossRefPubMed Kim YC, Lenke LG, Hyun SJ, Lee JH, Koester LA, Blanke KM (2014) Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision. Spine 39(21):1817–1828CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Deviren V, Tang JA, Scheer JK et al (2012) Construct rigidity after fatigue loading in pedicle subtraction osteotomy with or without adjacent interbody structural cages. Glob spine J 2(4):213–220CrossRef Deviren V, Tang JA, Scheer JK et al (2012) Construct rigidity after fatigue loading in pedicle subtraction osteotomy with or without adjacent interbody structural cages. Glob spine J 2(4):213–220CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ottardi C, Galbusera F, Luca A et al (2016) Finite element analysis of the lumbar destabilization following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Med Eng Phys 38:506–509CrossRefPubMed Ottardi C, Galbusera F, Luca A et al (2016) Finite element analysis of the lumbar destabilization following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Med Eng Phys 38:506–509CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M, Prosdocimo L, La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F, Villa T (2017) Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J 26(3):764–770. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4859-8 CrossRefPubMed Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M, Prosdocimo L, La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F, Villa T (2017) Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J 26(3):764–770. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-016-4859-8 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Charosky S, Moreno P, Maxy P (2014) Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 23(11):2340–2349CrossRefPubMed Charosky S, Moreno P, Maxy P (2014) Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 23(11):2340–2349CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study
Authors
Andrea Luca
Claudia Ottardi
Alessio Lovi
Marco Brayda-Bruno
Tomaso Villa
Fabio Galbusera
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5084-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 4/2017

European Spine Journal 4/2017 Go to the issue