Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Grand Rounds

Circumferential fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by distal junctional grade 4 spondylolisthesis in the sub-acute post-operative setting

Authors: Alexander A. Theologis, Deeptee Jain, Christopher P. Ames, Murat Pekmezci

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00586-017-4976-z/MediaObjects/586_2017_4976_Figa_HTML.jpg

Introduction

Surgical management for lumbar stenosis is generally safe and provides significant improvements in pain, disability, and function. Successful lumbar decompression hinges on removing an appropriate amount of lamina and other compressive pathology in the lateral recess. Too little bony decompression can result in persistent pain and disability, while over resection of the pars and/or facets may jeopardize spinal stability.

Case report

In this unique report, we present for the first time an acute iatrogenic grade 4 L5–S1 spondylolisthesis distal to a L3–5 laminectomy and circumferential instrumented fusion due to bilateral iatrogenic L5 pars fractures and its management and clinical outcomes after revision operation. The patient presented with worsening pain, neurologic compromise, and severe sagittal imbalance. The iatrogenic, high-grade spondylolisthesis was urgently addressed with a L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion and extension of posterior instrumentation to the pelvis, which resulted in considerable pain relief, resolution of neurologic deficits, and reconstitution of acceptable sagittal imbalance.

Conclusion

All attempts during a lumbar decompression should be made to prevent iatrogenic pars fractures, as they may result in severe sagittal imbalance, neurologic compromise, and persistent disability. Iatrogenic, high-grade L5–S1 spondylolisthesis can be successfully treated with reduction using circumferential fusion of the lumbosacral junction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1329–1338CrossRef Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1329–1338CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD et al (2007) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 356:2257–2270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD et al (2007) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 356:2257–2270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD et al (2009) Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1295–1304CrossRef Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD et al (2009) Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1295–1304CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rihn J, Hilibrand A, Zhao W et al (2015) Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) data. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:177–185CrossRef Rihn J, Hilibrand A, Zhao W et al (2015) Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) data. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:177–185CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler W et al (2016) Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374:1424–1434CrossRefPubMed Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler W et al (2016) Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 374:1424–1434CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Haher TR, O’Brien M, Dryer JW et al (1994) The role of the lumbar facet joints in spinal stability. Identification of alternative paths of loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2667–2670 (discussion 2671) CrossRef Haher TR, O’Brien M, Dryer JW et al (1994) The role of the lumbar facet joints in spinal stability. Identification of alternative paths of loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2667–2670 (discussion 2671) CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee KK, Teo EC (2004) Effects of laminectomy and facetectomy on the stability of the lumbar motion segment. Med Eng Phys 26:183–192CrossRefPubMed Lee KK, Teo EC (2004) Effects of laminectomy and facetectomy on the stability of the lumbar motion segment. Med Eng Phys 26:183–192CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Weiner BK, Walker M, Wiley W, McCulloch JA (2002) The lateral buttress: an anatomic feature of the lumbar pars interarticularis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:E385–E387CrossRef Weiner BK, Walker M, Wiley W, McCulloch JA (2002) The lateral buttress: an anatomic feature of the lumbar pars interarticularis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:E385–E387CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Hao Y et al (1997) Anatomic considerations of the lumbar isthmus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:941–945CrossRef Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Hao Y et al (1997) Anatomic considerations of the lumbar isthmus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:941–945CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brunet J, Wiley J (1984) Acquired spondylolysis after spinal fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Br 66:720–724 Brunet J, Wiley J (1984) Acquired spondylolysis after spinal fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Br 66:720–724
12.
go back to reference Harroud A, Labelle H, Joncas J, Mac-Thiong JM (2013) Global sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life in lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 22:849–856CrossRefPubMed Harroud A, Labelle H, Joncas J, Mac-Thiong JM (2013) Global sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life in lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 22:849–856CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tanguay F, Labelle H, Wang Z et al (2012) Clinical significance of lumbosacral kyphosis in adolescent spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:304–308CrossRef Tanguay F, Labelle H, Wang Z et al (2012) Clinical significance of lumbosacral kyphosis in adolescent spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:304–308CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tanguay F, Mac-Thiong JM, Wang Z et al (2010) Developmental spondylolisthesis: is slip angle related to quality of life? Stud Health Technol Inform 158:182–185PubMed Tanguay F, Mac-Thiong JM, Wang Z et al (2010) Developmental spondylolisthesis: is slip angle related to quality of life? Stud Health Technol Inform 158:182–185PubMed
15.
go back to reference Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E et al (2005) The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5–S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:S27–S34CrossRef Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E et al (2005) The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5–S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:S27–S34CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hresko MT, Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E (2007) Classification of high-grade spondylolistheses based on pelvic version and spine balance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2208–2213CrossRef Hresko MT, Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E (2007) Classification of high-grade spondylolistheses based on pelvic version and spine balance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2208–2213CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boachie-Adjei O, Do T, Rawlins BA (2002) Partial lumbosacral kyphosis reduction, decompression, and posterior lumbosacral transfixation in high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: clinical and radiographic results in six patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:E161–E168CrossRef Boachie-Adjei O, Do T, Rawlins BA (2002) Partial lumbosacral kyphosis reduction, decompression, and posterior lumbosacral transfixation in high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: clinical and radiographic results in six patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:E161–E168CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O (1990) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by anterior and posterior reduction and stabilization. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:1060–1066CrossRef Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O (1990) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by anterior and posterior reduction and stabilization. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:1060–1066CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T et al (2006) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:583–590 (discussion 591–2) CrossRef Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T et al (2006) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:583–590 (discussion 591–2) CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Smith J, Deviren V, Berven S et al (2001) Clinical outcome of trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for high-grade L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2227–2234CrossRef Smith J, Deviren V, Berven S et al (2001) Clinical outcome of trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for high-grade L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2227–2234CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD et al (2013) Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults. Eur Spine J 22:402–410CrossRefPubMed Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD et al (2013) Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults. Eur Spine J 22:402–410CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Abtahi A, Brodke D, Lawrence B et al (2015) Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores after spine surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:824–828CrossRef Abtahi A, Brodke D, Lawrence B et al (2015) Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores after spine surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:824–828CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN et al (2012) Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis. Spine J 12:179–185CrossRefPubMed Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN et al (2012) Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis. Spine J 12:179–185CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Daubs MD, Norvell DC, McGuire R et al (2011) Fusion versus nonoperative care for chronic low back pain: do psychological factors affect outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:S96–S109CrossRef Daubs MD, Norvell DC, McGuire R et al (2011) Fusion versus nonoperative care for chronic low back pain: do psychological factors affect outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:S96–S109CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Miller JA, Derakhshan A, Lubelski D et al (2015) The impact of preoperative depression on quality of life outcomes after lumbar surgery. Spine J 15:58–64CrossRefPubMed Miller JA, Derakhshan A, Lubelski D et al (2015) The impact of preoperative depression on quality of life outcomes after lumbar surgery. Spine J 15:58–64CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Alvin MD, Miller JA, Sundar S et al (2015) The impact of preoperative depression on quality of life outcomes after posterior cervical fusion. Spine J 15:79–85CrossRefPubMed Alvin MD, Miller JA, Sundar S et al (2015) The impact of preoperative depression on quality of life outcomes after posterior cervical fusion. Spine J 15:79–85CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Anderson JT, Haas AR, Percy R et al (2015) Clinical depression is a strong predictor of poor lumbar fusion outcomes among workers’ compensation subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:748–756CrossRef Anderson JT, Haas AR, Percy R et al (2015) Clinical depression is a strong predictor of poor lumbar fusion outcomes among workers’ compensation subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:748–756CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Vialle E, de Oliveira Pinto BM, Vialle LR, Gomez JDC (2015) Evaluation of psychosomatic distress and its influence in the outcomes of lumbar fusion procedures for degenerative disorders of the spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25 (Suppl 1):S25–S28CrossRefPubMed Vialle E, de Oliveira Pinto BM, Vialle LR, Gomez JDC (2015) Evaluation of psychosomatic distress and its influence in the outcomes of lumbar fusion procedures for degenerative disorders of the spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25 (Suppl 1):S25–S28CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Circumferential fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by distal junctional grade 4 spondylolisthesis in the sub-acute post-operative setting
Authors
Alexander A. Theologis
Deeptee Jain
Christopher P. Ames
Murat Pekmezci
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4976-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

European Spine Journal 12/2017 Go to the issue