Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5

Authors: Fan Zhang, Haocheng Xu, Bo Yin, Hongyue Tao, Shuo Yang, Chi Sun, Yitao Wang, Jun Yin, Minghao Shao, Hongli Wang, Xinlei Xia, Xiaosheng Ma, Feizhou Lu, Jianyuan Jiang

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if the retroperitoneal oblique corridor will be affected by right lateral decubitus position.

Methods

Forty volunteers were randomly enrolled and MRI scan was performed from L1 to L5 in supine and right lateral decubitus positions, respectively. In images across the center of each disc, O was defined as the center of a disc and A (supine) or A′ (right lateral decubitus) was located in left lateral border of the aorta or the iliac artery; B (supine) or B′ (right lateral decubitus) was on the anterior medial border of the psoas. The distance of AB and A′B′ (Recorded as A-Ps and A-Pr, respectively) at each level was recorded and compared to each other. The relationships between A-Pr, sex, BMI and relative psoas cross-sectional area (PCSA) at each level were also evaluated.

Results

A-Pr was significantly smaller than A-Ps at L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4 (All p < 0.05); there was no significantly difference of A-Pr between all levels (p = 0.105), but L1/2 seemed to be larger than L3/4, followed by L2/3 and L4/5; A-Pr at each level was not affected by sex (All p > 0.05); linear relationships were found between A-Pr, BMI and PCSA at L1/2 and L3/4.

Conclusions

ROC at L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4 will significantly decrease from supine to right lateral decubitus position and the reason may be due to the relaxed psoas deformation. Using MRI images in supine position for pre-operatively ROC evaluation is not accurate. Spine surgeon should also be more cautious when OLIF is performed at L4/5 where ROC is the smallest. Patients from Asia and those with strong psoas major at L1/2 and L3/4 are also associated with relatively narrow ROC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA et al (2014) Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study. J Neurosurg Spine 21(5):785–793CrossRefPubMed Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA et al (2014) Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study. J Neurosurg Spine 21(5):785–793CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B et al (2015) Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(3):E175–E182CrossRef Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B et al (2015) Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(3):E175–E182CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE (2004) Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1(1):24–30CrossRefPubMed Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE (2004) Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1(1):24–30CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC (2007) Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:321–329CrossRefPubMed Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC (2007) Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:321–329CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shen FH, Samartzis D, Khanna AJ et al (2007) Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions. Orthop Clin North Am 38:373–386CrossRefPubMed Shen FH, Samartzis D, Khanna AJ et al (2007) Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions. Orthop Clin North Am 38:373–386CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hu WK, He SS, Zhang SC et al (2011) An MRI study of psoas major and abdominal large vessels with respect to the X/DLIF approach. Eur Spine J 20(4):557–562CrossRefPubMed Hu WK, He SS, Zhang SC et al (2011) An MRI study of psoas major and abdominal large vessels with respect to the X/DLIF approach. Eur Spine J 20(4):557–562CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr et al (2011) Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E4CrossRefPubMed Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr et al (2011) Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E4CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26 Suppl):S302–S311CrossRef Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(26 Suppl):S302–S311CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L et al (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar inter-body fusion. Spine J 6:435–443CrossRefPubMed Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L et al (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar inter-body fusion. Spine J 6:435–443CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S, et al (2015) Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4170-0 Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S, et al (2015) Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-015-4170-0
11.
go back to reference Hussain NS, Perez-Cruet MJ (2011) Complication management with minimally invasive spine procedures. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E2CrossRefPubMed Hussain NS, Perez-Cruet MJ (2011) Complication management with minimally invasive spine procedures. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E2CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr et al (2011) Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E4CrossRefPubMed Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr et al (2011) Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E4CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mayer HM (1997) A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:691–699CrossRef Mayer HM (1997) A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:691–699CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R et al (2012) Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 6(2):89–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R et al (2012) Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 6(2):89–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Katzell J (2014) Endoscopic foraminal decompression preceding oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion to decrease the incidence of postoperative dysaesthesia. Int J Spine Surg 1:8 Katzell J (2014) Endoscopic foraminal decompression preceding oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion to decrease the incidence of postoperative dysaesthesia. Int J Spine Surg 1:8
17.
go back to reference Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K et al (2015) Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal degeneration disease. Yonsei Med J 56(4):1051–1059CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K et al (2015) Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal degeneration disease. Yonsei Med J 56(4):1051–1059CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ohtori S, Mannoji C, Orita S et al (2015) Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spinal Kyphoscoliosis. Asian Spine J 9(4):565–572CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ohtori S, Mannoji C, Orita S et al (2015) Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spinal Kyphoscoliosis. Asian Spine J 9(4):565–572CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR et al (2002) Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 51(1):97–103CrossRefPubMed Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR et al (2002) Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 51(1):97–103CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Molinares DM, Davis TT, Fung DA (2015) Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study. J Neurosurg Spine 9:1–8 Molinares DM, Davis TT, Fung DA (2015) Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study. J Neurosurg Spine 9:1–8
21.
go back to reference He L, Kang Z, Tang WJ et al (2015) A MRI study of lumbar plexus with respect to the lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 24(11):2538–2545CrossRefPubMed He L, Kang Z, Tang WJ et al (2015) A MRI study of lumbar plexus with respect to the lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 24(11):2538–2545CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bulcke JA, Termote JL, Palmers Y et al (1979) Computed tomography of the human skeletal muscular system. Neuroradiology 17(3):127–136PubMed Bulcke JA, Termote JL, Palmers Y et al (1979) Computed tomography of the human skeletal muscular system. Neuroradiology 17(3):127–136PubMed
24.
go back to reference Yusof MI, Nadarajan E, Abdullah MS (2014) The morphometric study of L3-L4 and L4-L5 lumbar spine in Asian population using magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility analysis for transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(14):E811–E816CrossRef Yusof MI, Nadarajan E, Abdullah MS (2014) The morphometric study of L3-L4 and L4-L5 lumbar spine in Asian population using magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility analysis for transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(14):E811–E816CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kanno K, Ohtori S, Orita S et al (2014) Miniopen oblique lateral L5-S1 interbody fusion: a report of 2 cases. Case Rep Orthop 2014:603531PubMedPubMedCentral Kanno K, Ohtori S, Orita S et al (2014) Miniopen oblique lateral L5-S1 interbody fusion: a report of 2 cases. Case Rep Orthop 2014:603531PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5
Authors
Fan Zhang
Haocheng Xu
Bo Yin
Hongyue Tao
Shuo Yang
Chi Sun
Yitao Wang
Jun Yin
Minghao Shao
Hongli Wang
Xinlei Xia
Xiaosheng Ma
Feizhou Lu
Jianyuan Jiang
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4645-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Spine Journal 3/2017 Go to the issue