Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Article

Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes

Authors: Shih-Hao Chen, Chen-Hsiang Lee, Kuo-Chin Huang, Pang-Hsin Hsieh, Shan-Yin Tsai

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII) places patients at risk for pseudarthrosis, correction loss, spondylodiscitis, adverse neurological sequelae, and even death; however, prognostic factors that predict long-term treatment outcomes have not been clearly investigated. In addition, few studies concerning the feasibility of reconstructing the failed spinal events have been published.

Methods

We performed a cohort study of 51 patients who contracted PSII in the posterolateral thoracolumbar region at a single tertiary center between March 1997 and May 2007. Forty-seven patients (92.2 %) had one or more medical problems. Isolated bacterial species, infection severity, treatment timing, and hosts’ defense response were evaluated to assess their relationship with management outcomes. The use of implant salvage, or removal subsequent with a revision strategy depended on the patient’s general conditions, infection control, and implant status for fusion.

Results

The most common infective culprit was Staphylococcus spp. found in 35 of 60 (58.3 %) isolates, including 20 methicillin-resistant species. Gram-negative bacilli and polymicrobial infection were found significantly in patients presenting early-onset, deep-site infection and myonecrosis. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive therapy were responsible for implant preservation in 41 of 51 cases (80.4 %), while implant removal noted in 10 cases (19.6 %) was attributed to delayed treatment and uncontrolled infection with implant loosening, correction loss, or late infection with spondylodesis. The number of employed debridements alone was not significantly correlated with successful implant preservation. Delayed treatment for infection >3 months significantly led to implant removal (p < 0.05) and a higher number of failed spinal events. Patients with significant comorbidities, malnutrition, severe trauma, neurological deficits, long-level instrumentation, and delayed treatment had poor outcomes. Sixteen patients (31.4 %) exhibited probable nonunion or pseudarthrosis, and eight symptomatic patients among them underwent successful revision surgery.

Conclusions

Retention of the mechanically sound implants in early-onset infection permits fusion to occur, while delayed treatment, severe malnutrition and multiple comorbidities will most likely result in a lack of effectiveness in eradicating the infecting pathogens. Restoring optimal physiological conditions is imperative in high-risk patients to allow for further healing. When loosened screws cause peridiscal erosion and incapacitating motion pain, premature implant removal possibly results in failed fusion and correction loss. Reconstruction for a failed spinal event is feasible following infection control.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Heller JG, Garfin SR (1990) Postoperative infection of the spine. Semin Spine Surg 2:268–282 Heller JG, Garfin SR (1990) Postoperative infection of the spine. Semin Spine Surg 2:268–282
4.
go back to reference Rimoldi RL, Haye W (1996) The use of antibiotics for wound prophylaxis in spinal surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 27:47–52PubMed Rimoldi RL, Haye W (1996) The use of antibiotics for wound prophylaxis in spinal surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 27:47–52PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schuster JM, Rechtine G, Nirvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The influence of perioperative risk factors and therapeutic interventions on infection rates after spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35(9S):125–137. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8342c CrossRef Schuster JM, Rechtine G, Nirvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The influence of perioperative risk factors and therapeutic interventions on infection rates after spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35(9S):125–137. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181d8342c​ CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dan X, Jian XM, Xin LM, Dong HS, Jie W, Yang C, Yang Y, Shao WZ, Bao YM, Rui F (2013) A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 22:605–615. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2514-6 CrossRef Dan X, Jian XM, Xin LM, Dong HS, Jie W, Yang C, Yang Y, Shao WZ, Bao YM, Rui F (2013) A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 22:605–615. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-012-2514-6 CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Picada R, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Perra JH (2000) Postoperative deep wound infection in adult after posterior lumbosacral spine fusion with instrumentation: incidence and management. J Spinal Disord 13:42–45. doi:10.1097/00002517-200002000-00009 CrossRefPubMed Picada R, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Perra JH (2000) Postoperative deep wound infection in adult after posterior lumbosacral spine fusion with instrumentation: incidence and management. J Spinal Disord 13:42–45. doi:10.​1097/​00002517-200002000-00009 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426CrossRefPubMed Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kowalski TJ, Berbari EF, Huddleston PM, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2007) The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 44:913–920. doi:10.1086/512194 CrossRefPubMed Kowalski TJ, Berbari EF, Huddleston PM, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2007) The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 44:913–920. doi:10.​1086/​512194 CrossRefPubMed
19.
24.
go back to reference Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Fu KM, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR, Hart RA, Donaldson WF, Polly DW, Perra JH, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 36:556. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eadd41 CrossRefPubMed Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Fu KM, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR, Hart RA, Donaldson WF, Polly DW, Perra JH, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 36:556. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181eadd41​ CrossRefPubMed
25.
27.
go back to reference Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen SW, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2006) Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis 42:471–478. doi:10.1086/499234 CrossRefPubMed Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen SW, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2006) Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis 42:471–478. doi:10.​1086/​499234 CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J et al (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus aureus infection in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1770CrossRefPubMed Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J et al (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus aureus infection in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1770CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Abdul-Jabbar A, Takemoto S, Weber MH, Hu SS, Mummaneni PV, Deviren V, Ames CP, Chou D, Weinstein PR, Burch S, Berven SH (2012) Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: description of surgical and patient-based risk factors for postoperative infection using administrative claims data. Spine 37:1340–1345. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318246a53a CrossRefPubMed Abdul-Jabbar A, Takemoto S, Weber MH, Hu SS, Mummaneni PV, Deviren V, Ames CP, Chou D, Weinstein PR, Burch S, Berven SH (2012) Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: description of surgical and patient-based risk factors for postoperative infection using administrative claims data. Spine 37:1340–1345. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318246a53a​ CrossRefPubMed
36.
38.
Metadata
Title
Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes
Authors
Shih-Hao Chen
Chen-Hsiang Lee
Kuo-Chin Huang
Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Shan-Yin Tsai
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3636-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

European Spine Journal 3/2015 Go to the issue