Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Preoperative calculation of the necessary correction in sagittal imbalance surgery: validation of three predictive methods

Authors: P. Berjano, R. Cecchinato, M. Damilano, C. Morselli, V. Sansone, C. Lamartina

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Surgery for correction of sagittal imbalance has frequent adverse events and complications. The most frequent cause of failure is inadequate correction of imbalance. The aim of this study is to verify the accuracy of three published methods (exact method by Ondra, FBI method by Le Huec and spinofemoral angle method by Lamartina) to preoperatively calculate the needed correction.

Design

This is a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Fifteen patients treated for correction of sagittal imbalance, with preoperative and postoperative lateral standing whole spine radiographs, were identified. Preoperative calculation of the amount of needed correction has been done using these methods. In postoperative X-rays, the amount of correction obtained with and the degree of correction of sagittal imbalance have been measured.

Results and discussion

The FBI and SFA methods obtain equivalent calculations of the amount of needed correction. The estimated correction angle with both methods is higher than that calculated with the exact trigonometric method. The difference between the latter and the former methods is equivalent to the observed excess of pelvic tilt.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87PubMedCrossRef Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Lee JH, Jeong BO (2012) Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies. A retrospective review of 140 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(19):1667–1675CrossRef Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Lee JH, Jeong BO (2012) Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies. A retrospective review of 140 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(19):1667–1675CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lamartina C, Berjano P, Petruzzi M, Sinigaglia A, Casero G, Cecchinato R, Damilano M, Bassani R (2012) Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 1):S27–S31PubMedCrossRef Lamartina C, Berjano P, Petruzzi M, Sinigaglia A, Casero G, Cecchinato R, Damilano M, Bassani R (2012) Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 1):S27–S31PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yang BP, Ondra SL (2006) A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: comparison with the trigonometric method. Operative Neurosurgery 4(59):458–463 Yang BP, Ondra SL (2006) A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: comparison with the trigonometric method. Operative Neurosurgery 4(59):458–463
5.
go back to reference Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S (2011) Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):S669–S680CrossRef Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S (2011) Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):S669–S680CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cronen GA, Mulconrey DS, Buchowski JM, Kim YJ (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(8):785–791CrossRef Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cronen GA, Mulconrey DS, Buchowski JM, Kim YJ (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(8):785–791CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ondra SL, Marzouk S, Koski T, Silva F, Salehi S (2006) Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E973–E979CrossRef Ondra SL, Marzouk S, Koski T, Silva F, Salehi S (2006) Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E973–E979CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103PubMedCrossRef Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hyun SJ, Rhim SC (2010) Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients: a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:95–101PubMedCrossRef Hyun SJ, Rhim SC (2010) Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients: a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:95–101PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative calculation of the necessary correction in sagittal imbalance surgery: validation of three predictive methods
Authors
P. Berjano
R. Cecchinato
M. Damilano
C. Morselli
V. Sansone
C. Lamartina
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3025-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 6/2013

European Spine Journal 6/2013 Go to the issue