Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Ideas and Technical Innovations

Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a technical note

Authors: Yasuo Mikami, Masateru Nagae, Takumi Ikeda, Hitoshi Tonomura, Hiroyoshi Fujiwara, Toshikazu Kubo

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We devised a tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach to the spinal canal to preserve the bilateral facet joints and the paravertebral muscles when treating lumbar spinal canal stenosis. We report details of this operative procedure.

Methods

A 2-cm incision is made in the skin in the midline of the intervertebral level to be decompressed. The spinous process on the cranial side is partially excised, and incisions along the ligament fiber are made in the midline of the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments to expose the ligamentum flavum. After the lamina and the inferior parts of the bilateral facet joints are adequately excised, the microendoscopic discectomy system is inserted. With this procedure, no muscular tissue is seen in the surgical site. The portal approach is small, but if full advantage is taken of the spinal microendoscope’s merits, the bilateral facet joints are preserved and wide decompression of deep parts is possible. The microendoscope is positioned above the spinal canal to provide a good symmetrical field of view to enable easy anatomical orientation.

Results

Bilateral intervertebral joints were satisfactorily preserved in ten patients who received this surgery. All became ambulatory on the day after surgery and the clinical results remained favorable 3 years after the operation.

Conclusion

Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a midline approach is a minimally invasive surgical procedure with favorable results that enables preservation of paravertebral muscles and bilateral facet joints.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307 Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307
2.
go back to reference Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51:S146–S154PubMed Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51:S146–S154PubMed
3.
go back to reference Yoshida M, Ueyoshi A, Maio K et al (2005) Surgical procedures and clinical results of endoscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis. In: Dazawa A, Chen PQ, Chung JY (eds) State of the art for minimally invasive spine surgery. Springer, Tokyo, pp 15–24 Yoshida M, Ueyoshi A, Maio K et al (2005) Surgical procedures and clinical results of endoscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis. In: Dazawa A, Chen PQ, Chung JY (eds) State of the art for minimally invasive spine surgery. Springer, Tokyo, pp 15–24
4.
go back to reference Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T et al (2005) Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2:624–633PubMedCrossRef Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T et al (2005) Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2:624–633PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Castro-Menéndez M, Bravo-Ricoy JA, Casal-Moro R et al (2009) Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study. Neurosurgery 65:100–110PubMedCrossRef Castro-Menéndez M, Bravo-Ricoy JA, Casal-Moro R et al (2009) Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study. Neurosurgery 65:100–110PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1986) Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 60:909–911 Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1986) Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 60:909–911
7.
go back to reference Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Sakamoto A et al (2009) Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 34:e276–e280PubMedCrossRef Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Sakamoto A et al (2009) Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 34:e276–e280PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP et al (2008) Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome—an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:84PubMedCrossRef Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP et al (2008) Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome—an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:84PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hartmann F, Janssen C, Böhm S et al (2012) Biomechanical effect of graded minimal-invasive decompression procedures on lumbar spinal stability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1233–1239PubMedCrossRef Hartmann F, Janssen C, Böhm S et al (2012) Biomechanical effect of graded minimal-invasive decompression procedures on lumbar spinal stability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1233–1239PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a technical note
Authors
Yasuo Mikami
Masateru Nagae
Takumi Ikeda
Hitoshi Tonomura
Hiroyoshi Fujiwara
Toshikazu Kubo
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2806-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

European Spine Journal 9/2013 Go to the issue