Top

European Spine Journal

Published in:

01-11-2011 | Original Article

Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments

Authors: Kyung-Jin Song, Byung-Wan Choi, Taek-Soo Jeon, Kwang-Bok Lee, Han Chang

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 11/2011

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to determine whether fusion causes adjacent segment degeneration or whether degeneration is due to disease progression.

Materials and methods

Eighty-seven patients that had undergone single level anterior cervical decompression and fusions with at least 5 years of follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. Segments adjacent to fusion levels (above or below) were allocated to group A, and all others were allocated to group B. Radiographic evaluations of adjacent level changes included assessments of; disc degenerative changes, anterior ossification formation, and segmental instability. The developments of new clinical symptoms were also evaluated.

Results

In group A, adjacent segment degenerative change developed in 28 segments (16%) and two cases (2%) developed new clinical symptoms. In group B, adjacent segment degenerative change developed in 10 segments (3%), and two cases (0.7%) also developed new clinical symptoms. Additional operations were performed in one patient in each group.

Conclusion

Although, fusion per se can accelerate the severity of adjacent level degeneration, no significant difference was observed between adjacent and non-adjacent segments in terms of the incidence of symptomatic disease. The authors conclude that adjacent segment disease is more a result of the natural history of cervical spondylosis than the presence of fusion.

Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K (1993) Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 18:2167–2173PubMedCrossRef

Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F et al (2005) Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403–410PubMedCrossRef

Caspar W, Geisler FH, Pitzen T, Johnson TA (1998) Anterior cervical plate stabilization in one- and two-level degenerative disease: overtreatment or benefit? J Spinal Disord 11:1–11PubMedCrossRef

Dvorak J, Froehlich D, Penning L, Baumgartner H, Panjabi MM (1988) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension. Spine 13:748–755PubMedCrossRef

Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431–2434PubMedCrossRef

Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:79–85PubMedCrossRef

Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J et al (2003) Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28:2673–2678PubMedCrossRef

Goffin J, Van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Plets C (1995) Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 8:500–508PubMedCrossRef

Gore DR (2001) Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons. A ten year follow-up. Spine 26:2463–2466PubMedCrossRef

10.

Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R et al (2004) Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture 19:288–297PubMedCrossRef

11.

Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP (1990) Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation: a comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 15:1026–1030PubMedCrossRef

12.

Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519–528PubMed

13.

Kalfas IH (2002) Role of corpectomy in cervical spondylosis. Neurosurg Focus 12:E11PubMedCrossRef

14.

McGrory BJ, Klassen RA (1994) Arthrodesis of the cervical spine for fractures and dislocations in children and adolescents. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1606–1616PubMed

15.

Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD (2005) Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:558–563PubMedCrossRef

16.

Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Bellera FP, Link HD (2004) Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine J 4:315S–321SPubMedCrossRef

17.

Sekhon LH (2004) Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy: 18-month results. Neurosurg Focus 17:E8PubMedCrossRef

18.

Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40:607–624PubMed

19.

Song KJ, Lee SK, Song JH, Choi BY (2009) The comparison of multi-level fusion versus one-level fusion to the development of adjacent level degeneration in anterior cervical arthrodesis with PEEK cage and plate augmentation for the degenerative cervical spinal disorders. J Korean Orthop Assoc 44(6):613–618CrossRef

20.

Teramoto T, Ohmori K, Takatsu T et al (1994) Long-term results of the anterior cervical spondylosis. Neurosurgery 35:64–68PubMedCrossRef

Title: Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments
Authors: Kyung-Jin Song
Byung-Wan Choi
Taek-Soo Jeon
Kwang-Bok Lee
Han Chang
Publication date: 01-11-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1864-9

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

Etanercept attenuates pain-related behavior following compression of the dorsal root ganglion in the rat

Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis

The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc

Computed tomographic evaluation of odontoid process: implications for anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures in an adult population

Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the complete porcine spine in comparison with data of the human spine

In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study