Top

Published in:

01-03-2011 | Original Article

Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study

Authors: Axel Schäfer, Toby Hall, Gerd Müller, Kathryn Briffa

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2011

Abstract

The objective is to determine if pain and disability outcomes of patients treated with neural mobilisation differ for sub-classifications of low back and leg pain (LB&LP). Radiating leg pain is a poor prognostic factor for recovery in patients with LBP. To improve outcome, a new pathomechanism-based classification system was proposed: neuropathic sensitization (NS), denervation (D), peripheral nerve sensitization (PNS) and musculoskeletal (M). Seventy-seven patients with unilateral LB&LP were recruited. Following classification, all subjects were treated seven times with neural mobilisation techniques. A successful outcome was defined as achieving a minimal clinically important change in pain intensity (11-point numerical rating scale), physical function (Roland Morris disability questionnaire) and global perceived change (7-point Likert scale: from 1 = “completely recovered” to 7 = “worse than ever”). The proportion of responders was significantly greater in PNS (55.6%) than the other three groups (NS 10%; D 14.3% and M10%). After adjusting for baseline differences, mean magnitude of improvement of the outcome measures were significantly greater in PNS compared to the other groups. Patients classified as PNS have a more favourable prognosis following neural mobilisation compared to the other groups.

Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tölle TR (2006) Screening of neuropathic pain components in patients with chronic back pain associated with nerve compression: a prospective observational study (MIPORT). Curr Med Res Opin 22:529–537PubMedCrossRef

Grotle M, Brox JI, Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Vollestad NK (2007) Prognostic factors in first-time care seekers due to acute low back pain. Eur J Pain 11:290–298PubMedCrossRef

Ren XS, Selim AJ, Fincke G, Deyo RA, Linzer M, Lee A et al (1999) Assessment of functional status, low back disability, and use of diagnostic imaging in patients with low back pain and radiating leg pain. J Clin Epidemiol 52:1063–1071PubMedCrossRef

Luijsterburg PA, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, van Os TA, Peul WC, Koes BW (2007) Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 16:881–899PubMedCrossRef

Kent P, Mjosund HL, Petersen DH (2010) Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review. BMC Med 8:22PubMedCrossRef

Billis EV, McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA (2007) Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison. Eur Spine J 16:865–879PubMedCrossRef

Delitto A, Erhard RE, Bowling RW (1995) A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment. Phys Ther 75:470–485 (discussion 485–489)PubMed

McKenzie RA (1981) The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Spinal Publications, Waikanae, N.Z

Brennan GP, Fritz JM, Hunter SJ, Thackeray A, Delitto A, Erhard RE (2006) Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute “nonspecific” low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 31:623–631PubMedCrossRef

10.

Long A, Donelson R, Fung T (2004) Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine 29:2593–2602PubMedCrossRef

11.

Woolf CJ, Bennett GJ, Doherty M, Dubner R, Kidd B, Koltzenburg M et al (1998) Towards a mechanism-based classification of pain? Pain 77:227–229PubMedCrossRef

12.

Schäfer A, Hall T, Briffa K (2009) Classification of low back-related leg pain—a proposed patho-mechanism-based approach. Man Ther 14:222–230PubMedCrossRef

13.

Schäfer A, Hall T, Lüdtke K, Mallwitz J, Briffa K (2009) Interrater reliability of a new classification system for patients with low back related leg pain. J Man Manip Ther 17:109–117PubMedCrossRef

14.

Bennett M (2001) The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain 92:147–157PubMedCrossRef

15.

Hall TM, Elvey RL (2004) Management of mechanosensitivity of the nervous system in spinal pain syndromes. In: Boyling JD, Jull G (eds) Grieves modern manual therapy, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 413–433

16.

Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel VK (1983) Kinematics of lumbar intervertebral foramen. Spine 8:348–357PubMedCrossRef

17.

Breig A, Troup JDG (1979) Biomechanical considerations in the straight-leg-raising test cadaveric and clinical studies of the effects of medial hip rotation. Spine 4:242–250PubMedCrossRef

18.

Coppieters MW, Butler DS (2008) Do ‘sliders’ slide and ‘tensioners’ tension? An analysis of neurodynamic techniques and considerations regarding their application. Man Ther 13:213–221PubMedCrossRef

19.

Pham T, van der Heijde D, Altman RD, Anderson JJ, Bellamy N, Hochberg M et al (2004) OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited. Osteoarthr Cartil 12:389–399PubMedCrossRef

20.

Ostelo RW, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607PubMedCrossRef

21.

Cibulka MT, Aslin K (2001) How to use evidence-based practice to distinguish between three different patients with low back pain. J Orth Sports Phys Ther 31:678–688 (discussion 689–695)

22.

Kitteringham C (1996) The effect of straight leg raise exercises after decompression surgery—a pilot study. Physiotherapy 82:115–123CrossRef

23.

Kwan MK, Wall EJ, Massie J, Garfin SR (1992) Strain, stress and stretch of peripheral nerve. Rabbit experiments in vitro and in vivo. Acta Orthop Scand 63:267–272PubMedCrossRef

24.

Yoshizawa H, Kobayashi S, Morita T (1995) Chronic nerve root compression. Pathophysiologic mechanism of nerve root dysfunction. Spine 20:397–407PubMedCrossRef

25.

Fritz JM, Lindsay W, Matheson JW, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ, Moffit SD et al (2007) Is there a subgroup of patients with low back pain likely to benefit from mechanical traction? Results of a randomized clinical trial and subgrouping analysis. Spine 32:E793–E800PubMedCrossRef

26.

Dickenson AH, Bee LA (2008) Neurobiological mechanisms of neuropathic pain and its treatment. In: Castro-Lopes J, Raja S, Schmelz M (eds) Pain 2008: an updated review. IASP press, Seattle, pp 277–286

27.

Cleland JA, Childs JD, Palmer JA, Eberhart S (2006) Slump stretching in the management of non-radicular low back pain: a pilot clinical trial. Man Ther 11:279–286PubMedCrossRef

28.

Cleland JA, Hunt GC, Palmer JA (2004) Effectiveness of neural mobilization in the treatment of a patient with lower extremity neurogenic pain: a single case design. J Manual Manipul Ther 12:143–152CrossRef

29.

George SZ (2002) Characteristics of patients with lower extremity symptoms treated with slump stretching: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 32:391–398PubMed

30.

Allison GT, Nagy BM, Hall T (2002) A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for cervico-brachial pain syndrome—a pilot study. Man Ther 7:95–102PubMedCrossRef

31.

Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Wouters LL, Janssens K (2003) The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment technique in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33:369–378PubMed

32.

Cowell IM, Phillips DR (2002) Effectiveness of manipulative physiotherapy for the treatment of a neurogenic cervicobrachial pain syndrome: a single case study—experimental design. Man Ther 7:31–38PubMedCrossRef

33.

Hall T, Elvey R, Davies N, Dutton L, Moog M (1997) Efficacy of manipulative physiotherapy for the treatment of cervicobrachial pain. In: 10th Manipulative physiotherapists association of Australia conference, Melbourne, pp 73–74

34.

Ellis RF (2008) Neural mobilization: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. J Man Manip Ther 16:8PubMedCrossRef

35.

Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Childs JD (2007) Subgrouping patients with low back pain: evolution of a classification approach to physical therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:290–302PubMed

Title: Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study
Authors: Axel Schäfer
Toby Hall
Gerd Müller
Kathryn Briffa
Publication date: 01-03-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1632-2

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Closing–Opening Wedge Osteotomy for Severe, Rigid Thoraco-Lumbar Post-tubercular Kyphosis” (by S. Rajasekaran, P. Rishimugesh Kanna and Ajoy Prasad Shetty)

Low grade lytic spondylolisthesis L4/L5 treated with PLIF

Center of pressure excursion as a measure of balance performance in patients with non-specific low back pain compared to healthy controls: a systematic review of the literature

Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord

360° release and in situ bending correction for sagittal imbalance of the spine

Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms