Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2011

01-05-2011 | Grand Rounds

L5–S1 disc replacement after two previous fusion surgeries for scoliosis

Authors: Shah Jehan, Sherief Elsayed, John Webb, Bronek Boszczyk

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Following scoliosis surgery, lumbar motion segment degeneration below the level of fusion is not uncommon. Especially long fusions extending to the mid and lower lumbar spine increase the likelihood of degeneration of the remaining motion segments. The management for these patients is controversial and depends on the clinical presentation and level of degeneration. The increasing confidence in motion-preserving technology leads to a dilemma on whether to fuse the remaining lumbar levels or risk utilising disc arthroplasty to preserve the remaining motion segments and facilitate coronal balance in patients with previous long fusion for scoliosis. We present an interesting case of a 44-year-old lady, who underwent two-stage corrective surgery for progressive idiopathic scoliosis at the age of 22 years. In the first stage, she had T11–L3 anterior fusion, whilst in the second stage posterior fusion was done from T5 to L3. At 22 years after the initial surgery, she presented with worsening low back pain and bilateral L4 radicular symptoms. MRI scan confirmed severe disc degeneration at L3–4 and L5–S1 levels with preserved L4–5 disc. She initially underwent L3–L4 decompression and posterolateral fusion at that level, which relieved her radicular symptoms. However, she had persistent pain at the lumbosacral junction with Modic I changes. The options of an anterior L5–S1 fusion or disc replacement were considered and discussed with the patient. The disc replacement option was decided upon with the patient, as anterior fusion was judged to increase the risk of coronal imbalance. At the 1-year follow-up, she reported significant improvement in the back pain. The radiographs at 1 year showed satisfactory position and function of the artificial disc replacement. The disc was flexed laterally, accommodating the coronal balance of the spine. We conclude that L5–S1 motion segment can be preserved with artificial disc replacement in patients with previous long fusion for scoliosis surgery. The real difficulty arises when choosing between disc replacement and extension of fusion. In our patient, the disc replacement has worked well so far. However, the disc is clearly at a mechanical disadvantage, and loss of function in the mid- or long term would not be surprising.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, Olerud C, Tropp H (2009) Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:1512–1519PubMedCrossRef Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, Olerud C, Tropp H (2009) Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:1512–1519PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC (2003) Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 12:108–116PubMed de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC (2003) Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 12:108–116PubMed
4.
go back to reference Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, Riew KD, Lapp MA, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (2001) Complications and results of long adult deformity fusions down to L4, L5, and the sacrum. Spine 26:E182–E192PubMedCrossRef Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, Riew KD, Lapp MA, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (2001) Complications and results of long adult deformity fusions down to L4, L5, and the sacrum. Spine 26:E182–E192PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: Luque–Galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 27:776–786PubMedCrossRef Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: Luque–Galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 27:776–786PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Freeman BJ, Davenport J (2006) Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15:S439–S447PubMedCrossRef Freeman BJ, Davenport J (2006) Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15:S439–S447PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Guyer RD, Tromanhauser SG, Regan JJ (2007) An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion. Spine J 7:558–562PubMedCrossRef Guyer RD, Tromanhauser SG, Regan JJ (2007) An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion. Spine J 7:558–562PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kostuik JP, Hall BB (1983) Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine 8:489–500PubMedCrossRef Kostuik JP, Hall BB (1983) Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine 8:489–500PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Amor C, Lehman RA, Buchowski JM, Edwards C II, Christine B (2007) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5: fate of the L5–S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 32:2771–2776PubMedCrossRef Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Amor C, Lehman RA, Buchowski JM, Edwards C II, Christine B (2007) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5: fate of the L5–S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 32:2771–2776PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG (2007) Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. Spine 32:E240–E245PubMedCrossRef Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG (2007) Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. Spine 32:E240–E245PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lenke LG, Eiserman L, Bilancini ME et al (2004) Biomechanics of disc arthroplasty below a simulated long spinal fusion construct: is it stable and feasible? In: Paper presented at 68th international meeting on advanced spine techniques (IMAST) 11th Annual Meeting, July 1–3, South Hampton, Bermuda Lenke LG, Eiserman L, Bilancini ME et al (2004) Biomechanics of disc arthroplasty below a simulated long spinal fusion construct: is it stable and feasible? In: Paper presented at 68th international meeting on advanced spine techniques (IMAST) 11th Annual Meeting, July 1–3, South Hampton, Bermuda
12.
go back to reference McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, Sidiqi F, Dabbah M, Sefter JC, Hu N, Beatson H (2006) Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 31:S152–S160PubMedCrossRef McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, Sidiqi F, Dabbah M, Sefter JC, Hu N, Beatson H (2006) Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 31:S152–S160PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, Okuyama K, Suzuki T, Sato K (2000) Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 25:1837–1842PubMedCrossRef Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, Okuyama K, Suzuki T, Sato K (2000) Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 25:1837–1842PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moe JH, Valuska JW (1966) Evaluation of treatment of scoliosis by Harrington instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 48:1656–1657 Moe JH, Valuska JW (1966) Evaluation of treatment of scoliosis by Harrington instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 48:1656–1657
15.
go back to reference Moen KY, Nachemson AL (1999) Treatment of scoliosis a historical perspective. Spine 24(24):2570–2575PubMedCrossRef Moen KY, Nachemson AL (1999) Treatment of scoliosis a historical perspective. Spine 24(24):2570–2575PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Quirno M, Kamerlink JR, Valdevit A, Kang M, Yaszay B, Duncan N, Boachie-Adjei O, Lonner BS, Errico TJ (2009) Biomechanical analysis of a disc prosthesis distal to a scoliosis model. Spine 34:1470–1475PubMedCrossRef Quirno M, Kamerlink JR, Valdevit A, Kang M, Yaszay B, Duncan N, Boachie-Adjei O, Lonner BS, Errico TJ (2009) Biomechanical analysis of a disc prosthesis distal to a scoliosis model. Spine 34:1470–1475PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Violas P, Estivalezes E, Briot J, Sales de Gauzy J, Swider P (2007) Quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties below spine fusion, using magnetic resonance imaging, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 32:E405–E412PubMedCrossRef Violas P, Estivalezes E, Briot J, Sales de Gauzy J, Swider P (2007) Quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties below spine fusion, using magnetic resonance imaging, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 32:E405–E412PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhang YH, Zhao CQ, Jiang LS, Chen XD, Dai LY (2008) Modic changes: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 17:1289–1299PubMedCrossRef Zhang YH, Zhao CQ, Jiang LS, Chen XD, Dai LY (2008) Modic changes: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 17:1289–1299PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162 (discussion 1163) Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162 (discussion 1163)
Metadata
Title
L5–S1 disc replacement after two previous fusion surgeries for scoliosis
Authors
Shah Jehan
Sherief Elsayed
John Webb
Bronek Boszczyk
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1529-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

European Spine Journal 5/2011 Go to the issue