Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2010

01-09-2010 | Original Article

The impact of implantation technique on frontal and sagittal alignment in total lumbar disc replacement: a comparison of anterior versus oblique implantation

Authors: René Schmidt, U. Obertacke, J. Nothwang, C. Ulrich, J. Nowicki, H. Reichel, B. Cakir

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The concept of total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) is gaining acceptance due to good clinical short-term outcome. Standard implantation is strict anterior, which poses especially above the segment L5/S1 sometimes difficulties due to the vessel configuration. Therefore, oblique implantable TDR have been invented. In oblique implantation the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) is only partially resected, with additional partial resection of lateral annulus fibers. This could have an impact on biomechanical properties, which has not been evaluated until now. We therefore compared the standing ap and lateral X-rays pre- and postoperative after anterior and oblique implantation of TDR in segment L4/5. Significant differences between the groups were not found. In both the anterior and oblique group, segmental lordosis showed a significant increase, whereas total lordosis as well as ap balance were unchanged. The absolute segmental lordosis increase was nearly double in the anterior group. In conclusion, both anterior and oblique implanted TDR significantly increase segmental lordosis while retaining total lordosis and ap balance. The segmental increase is lower in the oblique implanted group which is probably due to the remaining ALL. Further studies should evaluate whether this finding has any implication for the long-term outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Kershaw T, Husted DS (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 30:2192–2199CrossRefPubMed Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Kershaw T, Husted DS (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 30:2192–2199CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565–1575CrossRefPubMed Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565–1575CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference David T (2007) Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the Charité artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 32:661–666CrossRefPubMed David T (2007) Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the Charité artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 32:661–666CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zigler J, Delamarter RB, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO III, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zucherman JF, Balderston R, Kitchel SH, Foley KT, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue JJ, Yuan H, Herkowitz HN, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the Prodisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162CrossRefPubMed Zigler J, Delamarter RB, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO III, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zucherman JF, Balderston R, Kitchel SH, Foley KT, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue JJ, Yuan H, Herkowitz HN, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the Prodisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappucino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal S (2009) Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9:374–386CrossRefPubMed Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappucino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal S (2009) Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9:374–386CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Marnay T (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement: seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:490–496CrossRefPubMed Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Marnay T (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement: seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:490–496CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30:1407–1411CrossRefPubMed Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30:1407–1411CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yaszay B, Bendo JA, Goldstein JA, Quirno M, Spivak JM, Errico TJ (2008) Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after Prodisc-L lumbar disc replacement. Spine 33:508–512CrossRefPubMed Yaszay B, Bendo JA, Goldstein JA, Quirno M, Spivak JM, Errico TJ (2008) Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after Prodisc-L lumbar disc replacement. Spine 33:508–512CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lazennec J-Y, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignement in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47–55CrossRefPubMed Lazennec J-Y, Ramaré S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignement in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47–55CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference La Grone MO (1988) Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19:383–393PubMed La Grone MO (1988) Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19:383–393PubMed
11.
go back to reference Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL (1996) Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 21:970–981CrossRefPubMed Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL (1996) Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 21:970–981CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319CrossRefPubMed Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, Mc Gillicuddy JE (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938–1944CrossRefPubMed Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, Mc Gillicuddy JE (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938–1944CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Le Huec JC, Basso Y, Mathews H, Mehbod A, Aunoble S, Friesem T, Zdeblick T (2005) The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 14:480–486CrossRefPubMed Le Huec JC, Basso Y, Mathews H, Mehbod A, Aunoble S, Friesem T, Zdeblick T (2005) The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 14:480–486CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, Lemaire JP, Tropiano P, Lafage V, Skalli W (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16:411–421CrossRefPubMed Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, Lemaire JP, Tropiano P, Lafage V, Skalli W (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16:411–421CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS, Kim SH (2006) The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignement and range of motion of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:307–311CrossRefPubMed Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS, Kim SH (2006) The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignement and range of motion of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:307–311CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cakir B, Richter M, Käfer W, Puhl W, Schmidt R (2005) The impact of total lumbar disc replacement on segmental and total lumbar lordosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20:357–364CrossRef Cakir B, Richter M, Käfer W, Puhl W, Schmidt R (2005) The impact of total lumbar disc replacement on segmental and total lumbar lordosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20:357–364CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cakir B, Schmidt R, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M (2004) Sagittal alignement and segmental range of motion after total disc replacement of the lumbar spine. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:159–165CrossRefPubMed Cakir B, Schmidt R, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M (2004) Sagittal alignement and segmental range of motion after total disc replacement of the lumbar spine. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:159–165CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG (2001) Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26:E122–E129CrossRefPubMed Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG (2001) Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26:E122–E129CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G (2005) Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 30:738–743CrossRefPubMed Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G (2005) Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 30:738–743CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim YS, Minamide A, Su KK, Tomita K, Hutton WC (2003) Adjacent segment motion after simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28:1560–1566CrossRefPubMed Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim YS, Minamide A, Su KK, Tomita K, Hutton WC (2003) Adjacent segment motion after simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28:1560–1566CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369–383PubMed van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369–383PubMed
23.
go back to reference Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87CrossRefPubMed Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A (1985) Towards standards for posture: postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 10:83–87CrossRefPubMed During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A (1985) Towards standards for posture: postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 10:83–87CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Duval-Beaupère G, Legaye J (2004) Composante sagittale de la statique rachidienne. Rev Rhum 71:105–119CrossRef Duval-Beaupère G, Legaye J (2004) Composante sagittale de la statique rachidienne. Rev Rhum 71:105–119CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353CrossRefPubMed Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The impact of implantation technique on frontal and sagittal alignment in total lumbar disc replacement: a comparison of anterior versus oblique implantation
Authors
René Schmidt
U. Obertacke
J. Nothwang
C. Ulrich
J. Nowicki
H. Reichel
B. Cakir
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1432-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

European Spine Journal 9/2010 Go to the issue